Literature DB >> 3207330

168 double J (pigtail) ureteric catheter insertions: a retrospective review.

F H Smedley1, J Rimmer, M Taube, L Edwards.   

Abstract

The medical records of 116 patients who had 168 ureteric double J (pigtail) catheters inserted over a 6-year period between 1981 and 1987 were reviewed. Eighty-five patients had pigtails inserted for benign conditions and 31 for malignant disease. The pigtail catheters were inserted cystoscopically in 88 patients, percutaneously in 7 patients and by open surgery in 21 patients. Of 168 pigtail catheters used, 147 were soft (silicone, multilength) and 21 hard (polyurethane). No mortality was attributable to the use of these catheters but certain complications were commonly encountered. Loin discomfort occurred after 32 (19%) insertions; 27 of 147 (18%) soft catheters and 5 of 21 (24%) hard catheters. Trigonal irritation, confirmed cystoscopically was reported in 26 of 147 (18%) insertions of soft catheters and in 6 of the 21 (29%) with hard catheters (chi 2, P = 0.37). Urinary tract infection (confirmed by urine microscopy and culture) occurred after 46 (31%) soft catheter insertions and after 13 of 21 (61%) hard catheter insertions (chi 2 test, P = 0.01). Stent migration occurred in five patients and obstruction in two. Pigtail catheters are safe ureteric stents which are easy to insert and their use is supported by this study. The complications of associated infection, trigonal irritation and loin discomfort are relatively common and still occur even with soft catheters. Careful monitoring of all patients with pigtail catheters in position is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3207330      PMCID: PMC2498628     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  11 in total

1.  Double J stents. A review of 100 patients.

Authors:  R D Pocock; M J Stower; M A Ferro; P J Smith; J C Gingell
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1986-12

2.  Druy ureteral stent set: clinical experience in 25 patients.

Authors:  G Rozenblit; E Tarasov; M F Srur; C D Neithamer; E H Sumers; T A Sos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A new technique for transurethral insertion of a silicone rubber tube into an obstructed ureter.

Authors:  S Orikasa; I Tsuji; T Siba; N Oashi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The management of ureteral obstruction with silicone rubber splint catheters.

Authors:  J L Marmar
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Indwelling ureteral stents: percutaneous management of complications.

Authors:  A J LeRoy; H J Williams; J W Segura; D E Patterson; R C Benson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A dilating introducer-sheath for the antegrade insertion of ureteral stents.

Authors:  E M Druy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Percutaneous nephrostomy.

Authors:  R H Reznek; L B Talner
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Self-retained internal ureteral stents: a new approach.

Authors:  T W Hepperlen; H K Mardis; H Kammandel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically.

Authors:  P D Zimskind; T R Fetter; J L Wilkerson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent.

Authors:  R P Finney
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  A scoping review of important urinary catheter induced complications.

Authors:  K H Dellimore; A R Helyer; S E Franklin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  A comparison of adverse pregnancy events between ureteral stents and percutaneous nephrostomy tubes in the treatment of nephrolithiasis during pregnancy: A propensity score-matched analysis of a large multi-institutional research network.

Authors:  Matthew M Mason; Sirpi Nackeeran; Soum Lokeshwar; Marisa R Carino Mason; Taylor Kohn; Hemendra N Shah; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Fluoroscopy-free double-J stent placement through ureteroscope working channel postuncomplicated ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: A novel technique.

Authors:  Hamdy A Aboutaleb; Tamer A Ali; Maher Gawish; Mohamed Kamal Omar
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

4.  Are Technology-Driven Mobile Phone Applications (Apps) the New Currency for Digital Stent Registries and Patient Communication: Prospective Outcomes Using Urostentz App.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Milap J Shah; Nithesh Naik; Mohan Amaresh; Padmaraj Hegde; Rahil Hussein Beary; Suraj Jayadeva; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2021-01-06

5.  Ureteral stent complications - experience on 50,000 procedures.

Authors:  Petrișor Geavlete; Dragos Georgescu; Razvan Mulțescu; Florin Stanescu; Cosmin Cozma; Bogdan Geavlete
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec

6.  Ureteral stent discomfort: Etiology and management.

Authors:  Ricardo Miyaoka; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

7.  Double J stents in the treatment of gynaecological injury to the ureter.

Authors:  W H Turner; D W Cranston; A H Davies; G J Fellows; J C Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 18.000

8.  Sudden, Painless Incontinence following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Case Report.

Authors:  Fatih Akbulut; Alpaslan Akbas; Dilek Sahin
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2013-09-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.