| Literature DB >> 32072938 |
Ilona Ruotsalainen1, Tetiana Gorbach2, Jaana Perkola3, Ville Renvall4, Heidi J Syväoja5, Tuija H Tammelin5, Juha Karvanen6, Tiina Parviainen7.
Abstract
Physical activity and exercise beneficially link to brain properties and cognitive functions in older adults, but the findings concerning adolescents remain tentative. During adolescence, the brain undergoes significant changes, which are especially pronounced in white matter. Studies provide contradictory evidence regarding the influence of physical activity or aerobic-exercise on executive functions in youth. Little is also known about the link between both fitness and physical activity with the brain's white matter during puberty. We investigated the connection between aerobic fitness and physical activity with the white matter in 59 adolescents. We further determined whether white matter interacts with the connection of fitness or physical activity with core executive functions. Our results show that only the level of aerobic fitness, but not of physical activity relates to white matter. Furthermore, the white matter of the corpus callosum and the right superior corona radiata moderates the links of aerobic fitness and physical activity with working memory. Our results suggest that aerobic fitness and physical activity have an unequal contribution to the white matter properties in adolescents. We propose that the differences in white matter properties could underlie the variations in the relationship between either physical activity or aerobic fitness with working memory.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion tensor imaging; Executive functions; Fitness; Fractional anisotropy; Physical activity; White matter
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32072938 PMCID: PMC7013351 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100765
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci ISSN: 1878-9293 Impact factor: 6.464
Participant demographics.
| Mean ± SD | Range | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 14.3 ± 0.9 | 12.7–16.2 |
| BMI | 20.6 ± 2.7 | 14.6–31.1 |
| Pubertal stage | 3.5 ± 0.9 | 1.5–5 |
| 20-m shuttle run (min) | 5.7 ± 2.4 | 1.5–11.6 |
| MVPA (min/day) | 49.1 ± 19.2 | 18–105.9 |
| Flanker BI (ms) | 492.8 ± 126.4 | 315.7–900.0 |
| Flanker BC (ms) | 466.7 ± 111.9 | 299.4–801.4 |
| Flanker AI (ms) | 419.7 ± 80.0 | 284.1–682.5 |
| Flanker AC (ms) | 397.5 ± 74.4 | 278.3–629.5 |
| Rapid visual processing | −0.03 ± 1.01 | −3.11–1.96 |
| Spatial working memory | 1.47 ± 1.08 | −2.08–3.57 |
| N = 59 (58 for the Flanker tasks), | ||
BMI: body mass index, MVPA: moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, BI: incompatible incongruent, BC: incompatible congruent, AI: compatible incongruent, AC: compatible congruent.
Fig. 1Associations (p < 0.05, corrected for family-wise error) between aerobic fitness and fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD). The results are overlaid on an MNI152 1-mm template (MNI coordinates of all slices are −12, −24 and 25). The association between aerobic fitness and FA (red) was positive, and the association between aerobic fitness, MD (blue), RD (yellow), and AD (pink) was negative. The significant regions are thickened for illustrative purposes (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Characteristics of clusters that correlated with aerobic fitness.
| Measure | Cluster | Cluster size (voxels) | Anatomica location of clusters (center of mass) | t | p-value | MNI coordinates | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | ||||||
| FA | 1 | 801 | Superior corona radiata L | 2.39 | 0.025 | −25.4 | −12.1 | 26.5 |
| FA | 2 | 563 | Superior corona radiata R | 2.34 | 0.037 | 27.6 | −17.2 | 32.2 |
| FA | 3 | 431 | Body of corpus callosum | 2.36 | 0.039 | −1.5 | 14.9 | 20.4 |
| FA | 4 | 319 | Body of corpus callosum | 2.34 | 0.044 | −4.15 | −24 | 26.7 |
| FA | 5 | 83 | Superior corona radiata R | 2.51 | 0.047 | 24.3 | 11.2 | 30.6 |
| FA | 6 | 25 | Unclassified | 2.09 | 0.05 | 30.5 | 6.84 | 25.6 |
| FA | 7 | 2 | Superior corona radiata R | 3.29 | 0.05 | 22.5 | −14.5 | 35.5 |
| FA | 8 | 1 | Superior corona radiata R | 3.43 | 0.05 | 21 | −13 | 35 |
| MD | 1 | 15494 | Body of corpus callosum | 1.99 | 0.03 | 1.92 | −4.17 | 28.4 |
| RD | 1 | 7674 | Unclassified | 2.02 | 0.032 | 9.33 | −15.6 | 25.6 |
| AD | 1 | 2117 | Anterior limb of internal capsule R | 1.85 | 0.026 | 21.9 | 20.3 | 10.1 |
| 2 | 980 | Body of corpus callosum | 1.85 | 0.031 | −17.8 | 5.9 | 32.5 | |
| 3 | 67 | Unclassified | 3.02 | 0.046 | 33.9 | 21.6 | 19.3 | |
| 4 | 34 | Unclassified | 3.14 | 0.047 | 16.6 | 21.1 | 38.9 | |
The MNI coordinates indicate the anatomical location of the centre of mass for each cluster. The p-values were derived from the clusters and were revealed by the threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) and controlled for the family-wise error rate (FWER). JHU ICBM-DTI-81 atlas does not encompass all the white matter voxels, for this reason, some voxels are labelled as "unclassified".
The footnotes list all the tracts that each cluster overlaps with according to the JHU ICBM-DTI-81 atlas and indicates the proportion of voxels that overlap with that particular tract in each cluster.
JHU ICBM-DTI-81 tracts (% of voxels) FA: Fractional anisotropy, MD: Mean diffusivity, RD: Radial diffusivity, AD: axial diffusivity, L: left, R: right, ACR: Anterior corona radiata, ALIC: Anterior limb of internal capsule, CC: Corpus callosum, PCR: Posterior corona radiata, PLIC: Posterior limb of internal capsule, PTR: Posterior thalamic radiation, RLIC: Retrolenticular part of internal capsule, SCR: Superior corona radiata, SFOF: Superior fronto-occipital fasciculus, SLF: Superior longitudinal fasciculus.
SCR L (76.5), PLIC (12.9), PCR L (5.9), RLIC (4.7).
SCR R (43.2), Unclassified (21.6), PCR R (20.3), SLF R (14.9).
Body of CC (66.0), Genu of CC (34.0).
Body of CC (92.5), Splenium of CC (5.0), Unclassified (2.5).
SCR R (77.8), ACR R (22.2).
SLF R (66.7), SCR R (33.3).
Unclassified (52.5), Body of CC (6.4), Genu of CC (4.6), Splenium of CC (4.5), SCR L (3.8), SCR R (3.7), ACR R (3.4), SLF R (3.2), PLIC L (2.8), ALIC L (1.9), RLIC L (1.8), PLIC R (1.6), RLIC R (1.4), PCR R (1.4), ACR L (1.4), PCR L (1.3), SLF L (1.1), ALIC R (0.9), PTR L (0.8), External capsule L (0.4), SFOF L (0.3), Sagittal stratum R (0.2), External capsule R (0.2).
Unclassified (29.7), Body of CC (13.7), SCR R (9.1), SCR L (9.0), SLF R (6.9), Genu of CC (6.3), RLIC R (4.1), PLIC L (3.8), Splenium of CC (3.1), PCR R (2.9), PLIC R (2.7), RLIC L (2.3), ACR L (2.1), PCR L (0.8), External capsule L (0.6), SLF L (0.6), Sagittal stratum R (0.5), Fornix / Stria terminalis R (0.4), Fornix / Stria terminalis L (0.4), External capsule R (0.3), Cerebral peduncle R (0.2), ACR R (0.2), ALIC L (0.1).
ACR (32.3), Unclassified (25.5), Genu of CC (13.7), ALIC R (11.4), Body of CC (7.2), SCR R (4.2), PLIC R (3.8), External capsule R (1.5), Uncinate fasciculus (0.3).
Unclassified (43.1), Genu of CC (18.5), SCR L (15.4), ACR L (13.1), Body of CC (6.2), PCR L (3.8).
Fig. 2The moderating effect of FA of (High: + 1 SD, Low: −1 SD) (A) the body of corpus callosum (CC), and (B) the right superior corona radiata (SCR) regarding the relationship between working memory and the 20-m shuttle run performance. The moderating effect of FA of (C) the genu and (D) the body of corpus callosum regarding the relationship between working memory and the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).