Literature DB >> 22989512

Mandibular second molar periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction in young adults.

Ana Inocêncio Faria1, Mercedes Gallas-Torreira, Mónica López-Ratón.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of preoperative periodontal defects and analyze 12-month spontaneous healing on the distal aspect of the mandibular second molar (M2) after impacted mandibular third molar (M3) extraction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective clinical study was conducted in 25 healthy young patients (21.03 ± 4.38 yr old) with 40 extractions of higher-risk periodontal impacted M3s. Plaque and gingival indexes, recession, bleeding on probing, probing depth (PD), and attachment level were recorded before surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery at 5 sites on the distal aspect of the M2.
RESULTS: The initial mean PD was 5.70 ± 3.80 mm, with the deepest mean PD at the lingual side. At 12 months, a mean PD average of 3.77 ± 2.86 mm was recorded, with a total average recovery of 1.93 ± 2.46 mm (P < .001), that was higher at 3 months (-1.62 mm, P < .001). The PD and attachment level improvements were statistically significant (P < .001) and nearly clinically significant from baseline to 12-month follow-up and from the buccal to the lingual side of the distal aspect of the M2.
CONCLUSIONS: Impacted M3s adjacent to M2s lead to periodontal defects that are deepest at the lingual side and almost recover at 12 months after extraction. The first 3 months is considered the cutoff for periodontal healing. Young adults with high-risk periodontal M3 impactions may benefit from early extraction, which increases spontaneous periodontal healing.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22989512     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

1.  [Application of β-TCP for bone defect restore after the mandibular third molars extraction: A splitmouth clinical trial].

Authors:  C Cao; F Wang; E B Wang; Y Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

2.  Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Juliet Hounsome; Gerlinde Pilkington; James Mahon; Angela Boland; Sophie Beale; Eleanor Kotas; Tara Renton; Rumona Dickson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Effectiveness of a personalized device in the evaluation of mandibular second molar periodontal healing after surgical extraction of adjacent third molar.

Authors:  Roberto Pippi
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-02-04

4.  Spontaneous bone regeneration after surgical extraction of a horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: a retrospective panoramic radiograph analysis.

Authors:  Eugene Kim; Mi Young Eo; Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen; Hoon Joo Yang; Hoon Myoung; Soung Min Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-01-30

Review 5.  Effects of Impacted Lower Third Molar Extraction on Periodontal Tissue of the Adjacent Second Molar.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Xiaohang Chen; Zilan Zhou; Yujia Hao; Huifei Li; Yongfeng Cheng; Xiuyun Ren; Xing Wang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Computer-aided three-dimensional assessment of periodontal healing distal to the mandibular second molar after coronectomy of the mandibular third molar: a prospective study.

Authors:  Z Y Yan; Y Tan; X Y Xie; W He; C B Guo; N H Cui
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.