Literature DB >> 32071023

Multiparametric MRI of rectal cancer-repeatability of quantitative data: a feasibility study.

Bengi Gürses1, Emre Altınmakas1, Medine Böge1, M Serhat Aygün1, Onur Bayram2, Emre Balık2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to analyze the repeatability of quantitative multiparametric rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters with different measurement techniques.
METHODS: All examinations were performed with 3 T MRI system. In addition to routine sequences for rectal cancer imaging protocol, small field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging and perfusion sequences were acquired in each patient. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was used for diffusion analysis and ktrans was used for perfusion analysis. Three different methods were used in measurement of these parameters; measurements were performed twice by one radiologist for intraobserver and separately by three radiologists for interobserver variability analysis. ADC was measured by the lowest value, the value at maximum wall thickness, and freehand techniques. Ktrans was measured at the slice with maximum wall thickness, by freehand drawn region of interest (ROI), and at the dark red spot with maximum value.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients with biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the study. The mean values of the parameters measured by the first radiologist on the first and second measurements were as follows: mean lowest ADC, 721.31±147.18 mm2/s and 718.96±135.71 mm2/s; mean ADC value on the slice with maximum wall thickness, 829.90±144.24 mm2/s and 829.48±149.23 mm2/s; mean ADC value measured by freehand ROI on the slice with maximum wall thickness, 846.56±136.31 mm2/s and 848.23±144.15 mm2/s; mean ktrans value on the slice with maximum wall thickness, 0.219±0.080 and 0.214±0.074; mean ktrans by freehand ROI technique (including as much tumoral tissue as possible), 0.208±0.074 and 0.207±0.069; mean ktrans measured from the dark red foci, 0.308±0.109 and 0.311±0.105. Intraobserver agreement was very good among diffusion and perfusion parameters obtained with all three measurement techniques. Interobserver agreement was very good, except for one of the measurement techniques. As far as interobserver variability is considered, only ADC value measured on the slice with maximum wall thickness differed significantly.
CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MRI of rectum, using ADC as the diffusion and ktrans as the perfusion parameter is a repeatable technique. This technique may potentially be used in prediction and evaluation of neoadjuvant treatment response. New studies with larger patient groups are needed to validate the role of multiparametric MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32071023      PMCID: PMC7051263          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2019.19127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  24 in total

1.  Quantitative Assessment of Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Three Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for ADC Measurements at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging.

Authors:  Ivana M Blazic; Gordana B Lilic; Milan M Gajic
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the rectum: clinical applications.

Authors:  Truong Luong Francis Nguyen; Philippe Soyer; Paul Fornès; Pascal Rousset; Reza Kianmanesh; Christine Hoeffel
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  A Pattern-Based Approach Combining Tumor Morphology on MRI With Distinct Signal Patterns on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Assess Response of Rectal Tumors After Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Doenja M J Lambregts; Andrea Delli Pizzi; Max J Lahaye; Joost J M van Griethuysen; Monique Maas; Geerard L Beets; Frans C H Bakers; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  MRI of Rectal Cancer: An Overview and Update on Recent Advances.

Authors:  Kartik S Jhaveri; Hooman Hosseini-Nik
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  mMRI at 3.0 T as an Evaluation Tool of Therapeutic Response to Neoadjuvant CRT in Patients with Advanced-stage Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ulrike I Attenberger; Melissa M Ong; Nils Rathmann; Fabian Doyon; Peter Kienle; Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz; Lothar R Pilz; Dietmar J Dinter; Stefan O Schoenberg; Daniel Hausmann
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Conventional and ZOOMit DWI for Evaluation of Testis in Patients With Ipsilateral Varicocele.

Authors:  İsmail Okan Yıldırım; Semih Sağlık; Hüseyin Çelik
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Multiparametric MRI in the assessment of response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A comparison of morphological, volumetric and functional MRI parameters.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Lisa Tarlinton; Yousef Mazaheri; Kaitlin M Woo; Mithat Gönen; Leonard B Saltz; Karyn A Goodman; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T for early assessment of tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Andrea Delli Pizzi; Roberta Cianci; Domenico Genovesi; Gianluigi Esposito; Mauro Timpani; Alessandra Tavoletta; Pierluigi Pulsone; Raffaella Basilico; Daniela Gabrielli; Consuelo Rosa; Luciana Caravatta; Monica Di Tommaso; Massimo Caulo; Antonella Filippone
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-09

Review 9.  Rectal cancer MRI: protocols, signs and future perspectives radiologists should consider in everyday clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrea Delli Pizzi; Raffaella Basilico; Roberta Cianci; Barbara Seccia; Mauro Timpani; Alessandra Tavoletta; Daniele Caposiena; Barbara Faricelli; Daniela Gabrielli; Massimo Caulo
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-04-19

10.  Zoomed EPI-DWI of the pancreas using two-dimensional spatially-selective radiofrequency excitation pulses.

Authors:  Philipp Riffel; Henrik J Michaely; John N Morelli; Josef Pfeuffer; Ulrike I Attenberger; Stefan O Schoenberg; Stefan Haneder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Twenty Years On: RECIST as a Biomarker of Response in Solid Tumours an EORTC Imaging Group - ESOI Joint Paper.

Authors:  Laure Fournier; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Daniele Regge; Daniela-Elena Oprea-Lager; Melvin D'Anastasi; Luc Bidaut; Tobias Bäuerle; Egesta Lopci; Giovanni Cappello; Frederic Lecouvet; Marius Mayerhoefer; Wolfgang G Kunz; Joost J C Verhoeff; Damiano Caruso; Marion Smits; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Regina Beets-Tan; Emanuele Neri; Nandita M deSouza; Christophe M Deroose; Caroline Caramella
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.