Literature DB >> 32066560

Long-term visual outcomes of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis in Canada.

Andrei-Alexandru Szigiato1, Cristina Bostan1, Taylor Nayman1, Mona Harissi-Dagher2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate long-term visual outcomes of Boston type I keratoprosthesis (KPro) surgery and identify risk factors for visual failure.
METHODS: Single surgeon retrospective cohort study including 85 eyes of 74 patients who underwent KPro implantation to treat severe ocular surface disease, including limbal stem cell deficiency, postinfectious keratitis, aniridia and chemical burns. Procedures were performed at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal from October 2008 to May 2012. All patients with at least 5 years of follow-up were included in the analysis, including eyes with repeated KPro. Main outcome measures were visual acuity (VA), visual failure, defined as a sustained worse than preoperative VA, postoperative complications, and device retention.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 7.2±1.3 years (±SD). Mean VA was 2.1±0.7 (logarithm of minimal angle resolution) preoperatively and 1.9±1.2 at last follow-up. There were 2.4% of patients with VA better than 20/200 preoperatively and 36.5% at last follow-up. Maintenance of improved postoperative VA was seen in 61.8% of eyes at 7 years. Preoperative factors associated with visual failure were known history of glaucoma (HR=2.7 (1.2 to 5.9), p=0.02) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (HR=7.3 (2.5 to 21.4) p<0.01). Cumulative 8-year complication rates were 38.8% retroprosthetic membrane formation, 25.9% hypotony, 23.5% new onset glaucoma, 17.6% retinal detachment, 8.2% device extrusion and 5.9% endophthalmitis. The majority (91.8%) of eyes retained the device 8 years after implantation.
CONCLUSION: Almost two-thirds of patients had improved VA 7 years after KPro implantation. Preoperative risk factors for visual failure were known glaucoma and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cornea; infection; ocular surface; prosthesis; treatment surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32066560     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  [Ocular involvement in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis].

Authors:  Argyrios Chronopoulos; Maja Mockenhaupt; Uwe Pleyer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Boston type I keratoprosthesis versus penetrating keratoplasty following a single failed corneal graft.

Authors:  Jonathan El-Khoury; Diana Khair; Roy Daoud; Paul Thompson; Louis Racine; Mona Harissi-Dagher
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  The treatment of end-stage corneal disease: penetrating keratoplasty compared with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Steven Bonneau; C Maya Tong; Yelin Yang; Mona Harissi-Dagher
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Eight-years Egyptian experience of Boston type I keratoprosthesis following failed penetrating keratoplasty or ocular surface disease.

Authors:  Ihab S Othman; Hesham M Gharieb; Hani M G Ibrahim
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.