Manjesh K Singh1, Chengjun Kang1, Patrick Ilg2, Rowena Crockett3, Martin Kröger4, Nicholas D Spencer1. 1. Laboratory for Surface Science and Technology, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland. 2. School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AX, United Kingdom. 3. Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA), CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland. 4. Polymer Physics, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
We have studied the effect of cross-linking on the tribological behavior of polymer brushes using a combined experimental and theoretical approach. Tribological and indentation measurements on poly(glycidyl methacrylate) brushes and gels in the presence of dimethylformamide solvent were obtained by means of atomic force microscopy. To complement experiments, we have performed corresponding molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a generic bead-spring model in the presence of explicit solvent and cross-linkers. Our study shows that cross-linking leads to an increase in friction between polymer brushes and a counter-surface. The coefficient of friction increases with increasing degree of cross-linking and decreases with increasing length of the cross-linker chains. We find that the brush-forming polymer chains in the outer layer play a significant role in reducing friction at the interface.
We have studied the effect of cross-linking on the tribological behavior of polymer brushes using a combined experimental and theoretical approach. Tribological and indentation measurements on poly(glycidyl methacrylate) brushes and gels in the presence of dimethylformamide solvent were obtained by means of atomic force microscopy. To complement experiments, we have performed corresponding molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a generic bead-spring model in the presence of explicit solvent and cross-linkers. Our study shows that cross-linking leads to an increase in friction between polymer brushes and a counter-surface. The coefficient of friction increases with increasing degree of cross-linking and decreases with increasing length of the cross-linker chains. We find that the brush-forming polymer chains in the outer layer play a significant role in reducing friction at the interface.
Cross-linked
polymer brushes are often termed polymer brush gels
or simply gels. These polymer gels can swell in either water (hydrogels)
or oil (lipogels),[1] making them highly
suitable candidates for applications in the fields of drug delivery,
pharmaceuticals, tissue engineering, and other biomedical applications.[2−5] Surface-grafted polymer gels can be prepared using two different
methods: (i) in situ and (ii) ex situ. In the in situ method, the
polymer gels are prepared by cross-linking the chains while growing
them from the grafting surface, whereas in the ex situ method, polymer
gels are prepared by cross-linking the chains in a subsequent step.Polymer brushes have long been studied using experimental,[6−9] theoretical,[10−14] and modeling[15−21] approaches. Polymer-brush-bearing surfaces exhibit very low friction
in a good solvent.[8,22,23] Strong repulsive forces of entropic origin largely prevent the interpenetration
of polymer chains grafted on opposing surfaces. Such forces lead to
the formation of a thin fluid film between opposing brushes that assists
in reducing friction.[7] Studies have been
performed to study the effect of different design parameters, such
as molecular weight or chain length,[24−27] grafting density,[21,28−31] chain stiffness,[29] and solvent quality[8,32−34] on the tribological behavior of polymer brushes.There has also been interest in studying the effect of cross-linking
on the shear response of polymer brushes.[4,35−42] Lin et al.[43] investigated the effect
of cross-linking density and stiffness on the macroscopic behavior
of a type 1 collagen gel. It was found that an increase in the cross-linking
density and stiffness (of cross-linkers) leads to an increase in the
stiffness of the gel, but the cross-linking density plays the dominant
role. The grafted poly[styrene-b-(ethylene-co-butylene)-b-styrene] (SEBS) gel layer
showed improved tribological properties (less wear and lower friction
coefficient) in comparison to the dry grafted SEBS layer and an n-octadecyltricholorosilane self-assembled monolayer.[44] Recently, the effect of cross-linking was studied
using pentaerythritol tetraacrylate as a cross-linking agent for poly(ethylene
oxide) gels.[45] It was found that an increase
in cross-linker concentration lowers the swelling ratio and increases
tensile stress. Cross-linking is known to improve the wear behavior
of polymer brushes.[35,46,47] Kobayashi et al.[48] recently showed that
the macroscopic friction properties of a diamond-like carbon–silicon
(DLC-Si) specimen can be significantly improved by fabrication of
an oleophilic cross-linked copolymer brush layer on its surface. Pan
et al.[38] studied the friction properties
of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels against titanium alloys for biotribological
applications under varying loads and shear speeds. They concluded
that the effect of load on friction was more significant than that
of the speed. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogels
have been of particular interest to researchers for their potential
biotribological applications, and studies have been performed for
different combinations of substrate and counter-surface.[4,37,49,50] Li et al.[35] studied the effect of degree
of cross-linking on the mechanical and tribological behavior of poly(acrylamide)
(PAAM) brushes and hydrogels. They found that covalently cross-linked
hydrogels display higher Young’s moduli and coefficients of
friction in comparison with surface-grafted polymer brushes, and the
effect was found to increase with the degree of cross-linking. In
contrast, Ishikawa et al.[51] compared the
effect of mechanical properties and of chemical characteristics (polymer
hydration) on tribological behavior of hydrogels via pin-on disk experiments
and concluded that the chemical characteristics (e.g., hydration)
were the dominant factors. Ohsedo et al.[50] studied the effect of the presence of well-defined polymer brushes
on gel surfaces. Their study showed that longer poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate)
(PNaSS) brushes on PHEMA gels exhibit lower friction at low sliding
speeds. Dunn et al.[3] explored the distinction
between a self-mated “gemini” hydrogel interface and
hydrogels sliding against hard, impermeable counter-surfaces and demonstrated
that Gemini interfaces have very low friction coefficients, which
are independent of sliding speed. On the other hand, hydrogels sliding
against rigid impermeable surfaces exhibit higher friction, which
is strongly dependent on sliding speed or time in contact. Thus, experimental
studies have mainly focused on the role of solvent and effect of degree
of cross-linking on the tribological behavior of gels, but to the
best of our knowledge the role of the length of cross-linkers has
not yet been studied in detail.We performed complementary experimental
and simulation studies
to understand the tribological behavior of polymer brushes and gels.
We characterized the tribological behavior of poly(glycidyl methacrylate)
(PGMA) brushes and gel systems using a colloidal-probe-based lateral
force microscopy (LFM) technique. Friction measurements were performed
at various applied loads, while maintaining the sliding speed constant.
Polymer brushes and gels were modeled using a multibead–spring,
coarse-grained molecular-dynamics (MD) simulation technique. We compare
the experimental outcome with modeling results to rationalize the
effect of cross-linker chains on the frictional behavior of polymer
brush gels.
Methodology
Experiment
Materials
Friction experiments
were performed on PGMA brushes and gels in dimethylformamide
(DMF). The polymers were synthesized using the surface-initiated atom-transfer
radical polymerization[52] (SI-ATRP) method
on a silicon surface. They are characterized by their mean molecular
weight Mn = 281.7 × 103 g/mol and a polydispersity index PDI = 1.4. The grafting density
of the polymer brushes and gels is ρexpt ≈
0.16/nm2, i.e., 50 times the critical grafting density,[21] ρ* = (πRg2)−1. For details about the estimation
of these characteristics for our polymer brushes and gels, see the Supporting Information.The typical procedures
for SI-ATRP of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) were as follows: 0.141
g (0.9 mmol) of bipyridine (bpy) was dissolved in a mixture of 5 mL
of GMA (0.037 mol), 1 mL of H2O, and 4 mL of methanol.
The mixture underwent four freeze–pump–thaw circles
(15 min each) to remove dissolved oxygen. In the next step the mixture
was transferred to another flask containing 52.8 mg of CuBr (0.37
mmol) and 4.5 mg of CuBr2 (0.02 mmol). After stirring for
10 min at room temperature, the mixture was immediately transferred
to freshly prepared, initiator-modified silicon substrates. Polymerization
was performed at room temperature for various lengths of time without
stirring, after which the silicon substrates were removed from the
polymerization solution and sonicated in DMF to remove weakly adsorbed
polymer. PGMA brushes were cross-linked by ethane-1,2-diamine or ethane-1,6-diamine
in a postmodification manner. Amines can, in principle, react with
the epoxypropyl groups in the PGMA in several different ways, since
an amine can react with one, two, or even three epoxypropyl groups,
and each end of the cross-linker could react with a different number.
However, after a series of experiments (detailed in the Supporting Information), it was determined that,
under the conditions used, each end of each cross-linker reacted with
a single epoxypropyl group.Details of polymer brushes and gels
used in the tribological experiments
are presented in Table . Dry thicknesses of PGMA brushes and gels were measured with a variable-angle
spectroscopic ellipsometer (VASE, M-2000F, LOT Oriel GmbH, Darmstadt,
Germany) at an incident angle of 70°, using a three-layer model
(software WVASE32, LOT Oriel GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), each sample
being measured at three different spots. Cross-linkers of two different
lengths were used to prepare PGMA gels with different degrees of cross-linking
to facilitate the study of the effect of length and degree of cross-linking
on the tribological behavior of the gels. By degree of cross-linking
(p) we mean
Table 1
Table Summarizing
Experimental Brushes
and Gels under Study and in Particular the Cross-Linkers Used in Preparing
PGMA Gels
Methods
Frictional and normal forces
between a silica microsphere and PGMA brushes/gels were measured in
the presence of DMF solvent by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM).
All the measurements were performed using the MFP 3D Instrument (Asylum
Inc., Santa Barbara, CA). Asymmetric contact (i.e., brush/gel against
bare microsphere) was used to obtain a measurable friction value because
friction in symmetric contact (brush-against-brush contact system)
is so low as to be at the limit of the resolution of LFM measurements.The AFM was operated in contact mode, the lateral and normal movements
of the cantilever being monitored with a laser beam, reflected off
the rear of the cantilever, and detected with a four-quadrant photodiode.
These normal and lateral movements of the cantilever can be quantitatively
related to the normal and lateral forces acting between the cantilever
tip and sample surface if the stiffness of the cantilever and sensitivity
of the photodetector with respect to the cantilever position in the
respective direction are known.A nondestructive calibration
procedure, the thermal noise method,[53] was
used to estimate the normal stiffness of
the NSC36 (MicrosMasch, Tallinn, Estonia) cantilever. Sader’s
method[54] was used to calibrate the torsional
spring constant of the cantilever. A home-built micromanipulator (attached
to a BX 41, Olympus optical microscope, Japan) was used to attach
the colloid particles to a tipless cantilever. In this study, silica
microspheres (Kromasil, EKA Chemicals, Sweden) with a diameter, d = 14 μm (for the friction experiment) or d = 10 μm (for the indentation experiment) were attached
to different tipless cantilevers using a UV-curable glue (NOA 61,
Norland optical adhesive, Cranbury, NJ) and were cured overnight using
a UV lamp (9 W, Panacol-Elosol, Steinbach, Germany). The lateral sensitivity, SL, of the AFM cantilever was estimated using
the “test-probe” method[55] as described by Cannara et al. In this method, a colloidal sphere
is attached to the cantilever used for calibration, termed the “test
cantilever”. The “test cantilever” is of similar
width and thickness as the cantilever used for measurements or the
“target cantilever”. The diameter of the colloidal sphere, d = 80 μm, used for the test cantilever is larger
than the width of the cantilever.For lateral-force measurements,
10 “friction loops”
along the same line were acquired at each load. A scanning rate (n) of 1.0 Hz and stroke length (a) of 0.5
μm were used. Thus, the shear speed applied was calculated as v = 2na = 1 μm/s. Both the average
friction force and the standard deviation were calculated. All the
friction experiments were performed at room temperature (T = 300 K).
Simulation
We
investigated an explicit,
solvent-based multibead–spring generic coarse-grained model
by means of MD simulation. Chains were permanently grafted by one
end to a planar surface. To ensure that beads do not cross the grafting
surface, an additional 9/3 repulsive wall potential Uwall was used with cutoff zc = 0.5σ. Each grafted chain within the polymer brush consisted
of N Lennard-Jones (LJ) beads, linearly interconnected
by finite extendable nonlinear elastic (FENE) springs. Each chain
was attached to the substrate by one of its ends using an immobile
tether bead (red beads in Figure ). The rest of the beads in each chain were free to
move and interact with other polymer beads, the solvent, and the repulsive
walls, confining the system to infinitely extended parallel-plate
geometry. The solvent was modeled as a simple fluid using spherical
beads (brown beads in Figure ). A solvent molecule consists of one bead that has the same
Lennard-Jones diameter as a polymer bead. All the simulations were
performed for the brush-against-wall system. The wall was modeled
with the help of frozen arrays of repulsive LJ beads. The interaction
potential of counter-wall/surface with solvent and polymer beads in
the simulation is not purely repulsive. We have used a LJ/12–6
potential with cutoff Rc = 2.5 and ε
= 1.0. Periodic boundary conditions were applied only along the lateral
direction (along the x and y axis
of Figure a), which
coincides with the direction of sliding. To be specific, the explicit
solvent model was that employed earlier by Soddemann et al.[56] and Dimitrov et al.[32] The Lennard-Jones (LJ/12–6) potential was truncated at its
minimum and shifted to some desired depth (polymer–polymer,
solvent–solvent, and polymer–solvent energies εpp, εss, and εps), continuing
from its minimum to zero with a potential having a cosine form and
thus providing a potential that both is continuous and has a continuous
derivative at the cutoff distance rc,in. The parameters εpp = εss = 0
and εps = 0.4 were chosen to model good solvent conditions
in the current work. We have provided details of each potential used
in this work in section SVI of the Supporting Information.
Figure 1
Representative information from the model brush-against-wall
system
with explicit solvent and cross-linkers, subjected to shear. (a) Snapshot,
where polymer beads are colored cyan, tethered beads are colored red,
solvent beads are colored brown, and cross-linkers (Lcross = 2) are colored black. (b) Schematic of cross-linkers
of different lengths. (c) Density profiles and (d) velocity profiles
versus distance from the grafting surface (M = 50
chains tethered on the grafting surface, N = 50 beads
per chain, grafting density ρ = 0.075, length of cross-linkers Lcross = 2, and number of cross-linkers Ncross = 200 at velocity v =
1 applied on tethered beads.) All dimensional quantities are given
in Lennard-Jones (LJ) units. This particular simulation was performed
at very high shear velocity, v = 1, to achieve a
visible amount of alignment, whereas the shear velocity of all subsequent
simulations was taken as v = 0.001.
Representative information from the model brush-against-wall
system
with explicit solvent and cross-linkers, subjected to shear. (a) Snapshot,
where polymer beads are colored cyan, tethered beads are colored red,
solvent beads are colored brown, and cross-linkers (Lcross = 2) are colored black. (b) Schematic of cross-linkers
of different lengths. (c) Density profiles and (d) velocity profiles
versus distance from the grafting surface (M = 50
chains tethered on the grafting surface, N = 50 beads
per chain, grafting density ρ = 0.075, length of cross-linkers Lcross = 2, and number of cross-linkers Ncross = 200 at velocity v =
1 applied on tethered beads.) All dimensional quantities are given
in Lennard-Jones (LJ) units. This particular simulation was performed
at very high shear velocity, v = 1, to achieve a
visible amount of alignment, whereas the shear velocity of all subsequent
simulations was taken as v = 0.001.The temperature was kept constant by controlling
the temperature
of all the beads except for tethered and explicit wall beads by explicitly
rescaling their individual velocities.[29,57] We have used
a profile-unbiased thermostatting (PUT) scheme. The velocity profile
was calculated by computing the center-of-mass velocity of all beads
residing in layers parallel to the grafting surface. The center-of-mass
velocity of layers was used to define the “bias velocity”,
which was subtracted from the velocities of individual beads to calculate
their thermal velocities. These were rescaled to the desired value,
and subsequently the bias velocity was added. The temperature was
maintained constant at T = 1.2 using a profile-unbiased
thermostat as discussed above for all the simulation work in this
article.Details for generating the cross-linked polymer brush
were discussed
in our previous work.[58] For bonding within
cross-linker chains and bonding between cross-linkers and polymer
beads as part of the brush, we have used a harmonic bond potential, . Here KH is
the spring coefficient determining the bond stiffness, r0 is the equilibrium bond length, and r is the distance between two bonded atoms at any given time. We have
used KH = 100 and r0 = 1 to model rather stiff cross-linker bonds. The harmonic
bond potential we use does not strictly prevent bond crossing, but
bond crossing does not occur in practice for the chosen parameters,
as described in the Supporting Information section SV. All simulated quantities reported in this study are
given in terms of LJ units.[59] The cross-linked
polymer brush system was generated for different numbers of cross-linkers
(the number denoted by Ncross) with a
fixed contour length of cross-linker (Lcross) chains, and vice versa. Figure b shows the explicit cross-linkers. Lcross = 1 for monomers of different chains bonded by cross-linker,
while Lcross = 2 represents a single interior
bead that is bonded to two beads in the respective chains to be cross-linked.
The degrees of cross-linking (p) used in simulation
work are p = 0, 4, 8, and 16%, as defined in eq . For our simulation, we
have used LAMMPS (Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel
Simulator).[60]We have performed simulations
for the brush-against-wall model
system described in Figure . We note that the simulations have been performed at fixed
separation distances D (while measuring load), whereas
experiments are performed under prescribed normal load (implying a
separation distance D). The simulations were performed
on randomly grafted polymer chains on flat surfaces. The system consists
of M = 50 chains on the tethering surface, while
each linear chain is composed of N = 50 beads. As
mentioned in the section 2.1.1 (see also Supporting Information section SIII), the critical
grafting density[21] for such polymer brush
is ρ* = (πRg2)−1. We have considered grafting densities well within
the brush regime, ρ = 0.075 (∼7ρ*). We have not
considered additional bending stiffness of chains in the current work;
i.e., the simulations were performed on flexible, excluded-volume
chains. The total number of beads in the simulation box was such that
the number density of beads was maintained at a typical value of ∼0.8
at each separation between the grafting surface and counter-wall.
Results and Discussion
PGMA
Brushes and Gels in DMF
Colloidal-Probe Lateral
Force Microscopy
The measured friction force as a function
of normal load for PGMA
gels with cross-linkers C2 and C6 at a shear
velocity of 1 μm/s is reported in Figures a and 2b, respectively.
These results are compared with the corresponding results for a bare
silicon surface and PGMA brushes. The experiments were performed in
DMF solvent using a tipless cantilever of stiffness 0.976 N/m with
a silica colloidal sphere of diameter 14 μm attached to it.
The gels had different degrees of cross-linking. It can be seen that
PGMA brushes on silicon surfaces in DMF reduce friction significantly
when compared to bare silicon surfaces. The friction force was found
to be higher for PGMA gels (i.e., with cross-linking) in comparison
to PGMA brushes.
Figure 2
Friction force versus normal load for bare silicon surfaces
and
silicon surfaces bearing PGMA brushes and gels, measured by colloidal-probe
lateral force microscopy experiments using a tipless cantilever (0.976
N/m stiffness) with an attached silica sphere of 14 μm diameter.
PGMA gels have C2 cross-linkers with a degree of cross-linking
of 5, 15, and 50%. The PGMA gels with C6 cross-linkers
have degrees of cross-linking of 3, 18, and 36%. Experiments were
performed at constant speeds of 1 μm/s.
Friction force versus normal load for bare silicon surfaces
and
silicon surfaces bearing PGMA brushes and gels, measured by colloidal-probe
lateral force microscopy experiments using a tipless cantilever (0.976
N/m stiffness) with an attached silica sphere of 14 μm diameter.
PGMA gels have C2 cross-linkers with a degree of cross-linking
of 5, 15, and 50%. The PGMA gels with C6 cross-linkers
have degrees of cross-linking of 3, 18, and 36%. Experiments were
performed at constant speeds of 1 μm/s.A monotonic increase in friction force is observed upon increasing
the degree of cross-linking for gels with C2 cross-linkers.
At 5% degree of cross-linking the friction force is seen to remain
close to that for un-cross-linked brushes. At 50% degree of cross-linking,
the friction force is higher and even exceeds that of the bare silicon
surface. The observed higher friction (in comparison to a bare silicon
surface) can be attributed to an increase in contact area between
the colloidal sphere and the gel.Friction is also found to
increase with cross-linking degree for
gels made with C6 cross-linkers. At 3% degree of cross-linking,
the friction force is only slightly larger than that measured on (non-cross-linked)
PGMA brushes. At 18% degree of cross-linking, friction is notably
greater than that on (non-cross-linked) PGMA brushes and PGMA gels
with 3% degree of cross-linking. With a further increase in degree
of cross-linking to 36%, no significant further increase in friction
is observed compared to the results obtained with a 18% degree of
cross-linking.Similar experiments were performed at a shear
velocity of 5 μm/s
(Supporting Information section SVII).
A scanning rate (n) of 1.0 Hz and stroke length (a) of 2.5 μm were used. Thus, the shear speed applied
was calculated as v = 2na = 5 μm/s.
The friction coefficient was found to increase with increasing shear
speed for all the systems, but the overall trend in terms of the effect
of cross-linking was found to be very similar. Polymer brushes and
gels in our experiments underwent sliding and were not simply deformed.The friction force versus normal load curves show a linear relationship.
The coefficient of friction can thus be extracted from the slope by
linear-regression fitting. The obtained values for the coefficient
of friction will be discussed in detail in section .
Atomic
Force Microscopy (AFM)-Based Nanoindentation
AFM-based nanoindentation
was employed to study the effect of cross-linking
on the mechanical behavior of PGMA brushes and gels. The brushes and
gels in DMF were indented with an AFM cantilever bearing a silica
sphere of 10 μm diameter. The applied load (force) against penetration
depth is presented in Figure .
Figure 3
Applied force against penetration depth measured by colloidal-probe
atomic force microscopy with a 10 μm silica sphere glued to
a tipless cantilever (0.6 N/m stiffness) for (a) PGMA gels with C2 cross-linkers and (b) PGMA gels with C6 cross-linkers.
% values denote the degree of cross-linking in each system (as for Figure ).
Applied force against penetration depth measured by colloidal-probe
atomic force microscopy with a 10 μm silica sphere glued to
a tipless cantilever (0.6 N/m stiffness) for (a) PGMA gels with C2 cross-linkers and (b) PGMA gels with C6 cross-linkers.
% values denote the degree of cross-linking in each system (as for Figure ).Figures a and 3b show the applied load against
indentation depth
for different PGMA gels with different cross-linking degrees for C2 and C6 cross-linkers, respectively. A change in
the slope of the force-versus-depth curve occurs at the depth where
the AFM cantilever begins to be noticeably influenced by the substrate;
the steep part is caused by a substrate effect (the substrate is close,
and the brush appears stiffer). In general, the substrate influence
begins to be felt at around 10% indentation of the unperturbed brush
height.[61,62] Hence, we can approximate the height of
the PGMA brushes and gels by the penetration depth before this sudden
change of the indentation force. With C2 cross-linkers,
as the degree of cross-linking increases from 5% to 50%, the substrate
effect is shown at a lesser depth, which indicates a decrease in the
swelling ratio with increase in degree of cross-linking. The indentation
curves for PGMA brushes and PGMA gels with 5% cross-linking are similar,
as are the friction forces measured by LFM (cf. Figure a). The plausible decrease in swelling ratio
with an increase in the degree of cross-linking could explain the
increase of friction force: with increasing in degree of cross-linking,
there are few brush-forming chains available at the outer film layer,
which are responsible for the low-friction behavior in polymer-brush-based
lubrication.[9,23,35]The indentation curves for PGMA gels with C6 cross-linkers
also reflect the tribological behavior of gels observed in LFM experiments.
At a degree of cross-linking of 3%, the substrate effect is already
significant at penetration depths above 30 nm (implying a decrease
in swelling ratio compared to PGMA brushes), which correlates with
the increase in coefficient of friction. As the degree of cross-linking
is increased to 18%, there is a further decrease in swelling ratio,
and an increase in coefficient of friction was observed (Figure b). Upon further
increasing the degree of cross-linking to 36%, there is no significant
change in the indentation behavior anymore; similarly, we did not
observe any significant change in the coefficient of friction.
MD Simulation
Equilibrium
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
We equilibrated the polymer
brush/gel against wall system at different
separations D between the graft and the counter-wall
surface (see Figure a). A reduction of separation distance by 1 (LJ unit) was achieved
as follows: A number of solvent beads was randomly removed from the
system to ensure the same number density 0.8 at the new separation
distance. The grafting surface was kept fixed, and the counter-wall
was moved toward the grafting surface with a constant velocity v = 0.01 for a duration of 105 steps at an integration
time step Δt = 0.001. At each separation D between the polymer-chain-bearing surface and counter-wall,
the polymer brush/gel system was allowed to equilibrate for 3 ×
106 time steps (106 steps at Δt = 0.001 followed by 2 × 106 steps at Δt = 0.0025).Figure shows the number-density profiles of polymer beads
versus the z position measured from the grafting
surface. Upon inspection of the density profiles, the systems with
shorter cross-linkers show a decrease in brush height with increasing
degree of cross-linking, and more polymer density is accumulated at
the grafting surface. There is hence a lower polymer concentration
present toward the outer layer of grafted chains to assist in brush-mediated
lubrication.[9,63] AFM-based indentation experiments
(Figure ) show that
the wet thickness decreases with increasing degree of cross-linking;
the simulation observations are in complete agreement with the experiments.
Figure 4
Density
profiles for polymer brush/gel systems with M = 50, N = 50, and ρ = 0.075 in explicit solvent
for a separation distance D = 30, having (a) Lcross = 1 and (b) Lcross = 2. Density profiles are shown for different degrees of cross-linking, p = 0, 4, 8, and 16%.
Density
profiles for polymer brush/gel systems with M = 50, N = 50, and ρ = 0.075 in explicit solvent
for a separation distance D = 30, having (a) Lcross = 1 and (b) Lcross = 2. Density profiles are shown for different degrees of cross-linking, p = 0, 4, 8, and 16%.
The equilibrated systems at different separations
(D) were used to run nonequilibrium MD (NEMD) simulations.
Steady shear was applied by moving the tethered beads with the prescribed
velocity, keeping the separation between walls constant during each
run of given shear velocity.[20,58] At each separation
and velocity, the stress tensor was calculated using the Irving–Kirkwood
expression.[59,64]The NEMD studies were performed
at a fixed shear velocity v = 0.001 applied on the
tethered beads at different separations between explicit wall and
polymer-bearing surface. At each separation, normal and shear stresses
acting on the brush and cross-linkers were calculated for different
combinations of lengths and numbers of cross-linkers to study the
effect of cross-linking on the frictional behavior of model polymer
brushes. The simulations were done for 3 × 107 integration
steps, where data for the first 107 steps at time step
Δt = 0.002 were ignored to allow the system
to reach steady state. Data for subsequent 2 × 107 steps at Δt = 0.0025 were recorded and analyzed.
Simulations at each separation (D) were repeated
for 10 different initial configurations of randomly grafted polymer
chains, and mean values from these runs are reported with error bars
calculated from the corresponding standard deviations.Figure shows the
results on the effect of degree of cross-linking on polymer brushes
for different systems having cross-linkers of length Lcross = 1 and Lcross = 2.
In particular, Figures a and 5b display normal stress against distance
curves for systems with Lcross = 1 and Lcross = 2 cross-linkers, respectively. It can
be seen that the normal stress increases as the separation (D) between grafting surface and counter-wall surface decreases
for all the systems. For systems with Lcross = 1 cross-linkers the normal stress was found to be decreasing with
increasing degree of cross-linking at all separations. The decrease
in normal stress with the increase in the degree of cross-linking
can be explained with the help of the density profile curve (Figure a). The brush height
decreases with increasing degree of cross-linking; therefore, less
deformation is felt in brushes with a higher degree of cross-linking
at the same separation between wall and the polymer-bearing surface.
This results in a decrease of the normal stress at the same separation
with increasing degree of cross-linking.
Figure 5
Simulated (NEMD) systems
with M = 50, N = 50, and ρ
= 0.075 in explicit solvent having
different degrees of cross-linking, p = 0, 4, 8,
and 16%: (a, b) normal stress against separation, (c, d) shear stress
against separation, and (e, f) shear stress against normal stress
each for systems having cross-linkers of length Lcross = 1 and Lcross = 2,
respectively.
Simulated (NEMD) systems
with M = 50, N = 50, and ρ
= 0.075 in explicit solvent having
different degrees of cross-linking, p = 0, 4, 8,
and 16%: (a, b) normal stress against separation, (c, d) shear stress
against separation, and (e, f) shear stress against normal stress
each for systems having cross-linkers of length Lcross = 1 and Lcross = 2,
respectively.For the system with Lcross = 2 cross-linkers,
normal stress was found to be similar at different degrees of cross-linking
and lower in comparison to the un-cross-linked system at all separations.
This can be explained with similar density profiles for systems with
different degrees of cross-linking. Figures c and 5d show the
shear stress versus separation distance for systems with Lcross = 1 and Lcross = 2 cross-linkers,
respectively. We observe an increase in shear stress as the separation D between grafting surface and counter-wall surface decreases
for all the systems. We also notice an increase in shear stress with
increasing degree of cross-linking at all separations. This increase
in shear stress is found to be quite similar for Lcross = 1 and Lcross = 2. Figures e and 5f show a parametric plot of shear against normal stress for
different separation distances D for systems with Lcross = 1 and Lcross = 2 cross-linkers, respectively. The shear stress for all the cross-linked
systems is found to be higher compared to that of the un-cross-linked
system at a given normal stress. We also find an increase in shear
stresses with increasing degree of cross-linking at all normal stresses
for systems with Lcross = 1 and Lcross = 2 cross-linkers. These observations
can be rationalized as follows: Cross-linking leads to an interdependent
motion of cross-linked grafted chains under shear, resulting in an
increase in the shear stress for all the cross-linked systems when
compared to un-cross-linked polymer brush systems. Under shear, the
un-cross-linked systems are deformed more easily than a cross-linked
network of polymer brushes.[36] The increase
in the degree of cross-linking leads to more chains moving interdependently
under shear. We therefore find an increase in friction upon increasing
the degree of cross-linking.
Comparison
between Simulation and Experimental
Results
We are now in a position to attempt a qualitative
comparison of the experimental and simulation results. We compare
these studies in terms of the coefficient of friction (CoF), which
is a frequently used quantity to characterize the tribological behavior
of surfaces (Figure ). To compare flow conditions between experiment and simulation,
the dimensionless Weissenberg number (Wi = γ̇τRex with shear rate γ̇ and relaxation time τRex) is typically used. Under the experimental and simulation
conditions used in our study, Wi numbers have comparable values, as
demonstrated in the section SIV of the Supporting Information. Our simulations and experiments are located in
the boundary-lubrication regime. Friction forces arise due to the
interactions among wall, solvent, and polymer beads. We have calculated
the coefficient of friction from the slope of the friction force against
normal force. Thus, the presented results for the coefficient of friction
are unaffected by adhesion between wall and polymer brush. The interaction
potential between wall and polymer beads in the simulation is not
purely repulsive as mentioned already (section ). It is important to note that the overall
interaction between brush and wall can be considered repulsive. There
is an attractive van der Waals force present between the brush and
wall, which reduces the overall repulsion, but it does not lead to
an overall attractive interaction. The van der Waals interactions
between polymer brushes and surfaces are considered as “bridging
forces” and can be specific or nonspecific. Israelachvili[65] explained in detail various attractive “intersegment”,
“bridging”, and “depletion” forces acting
between polymers and counter-surfaces. Under suitable conditions,
“bridging forces” can lead to an overall attractive
force.
Figure 6
Coefficient of friction against degree of cross-linking for (a)
experimental results for systems with cross-linkers C2 (brown
lines) and C6 (gray lines) at a shear speed of 1 μm/s
and (b) simulation results for systems with M = 50
chains of length N = 50 for different lengths of
cross-linkers, Lcross = 1 (pink lines)
and Lcross = 2 (gray lines) at a shear
speed, v = 0.001 for a brush-against-wall system.
Coefficient of friction against degree of cross-linking for (a)
experimental results for systems with cross-linkers C2 (brown
lines) and C6 (gray lines) at a shear speed of 1 μm/s
and (b) simulation results for systems with M = 50
chains of length N = 50 for different lengths of
cross-linkers, Lcross = 1 (pink lines)
and Lcross = 2 (gray lines) at a shear
speed, v = 0.001 for a brush-against-wall system.For the experiments, a straight
line was fitted to the friction-force-versus-normal-load
curve in Figure .
The coefficient of friction is defined by the corresponding slope. Figure a shows the resulting
CoF as a function of the degree of cross-linking measured by lateral
force microscopy at a shear speed of v = 1 μm/s
for different lengths of cross-linkers. We see an increase in friction
force with speed for both cross-linking lengths studied here, which
translates into an increase in CoF (not shown). We also find an increase
in CoF with increasing degree of cross-linking (similar to ref (35)) for both cross-linker
lengths studied, while the CoF does not change significantly beyond
a degree of cross-linking of 18% for C6 cross-linkers.
The coefficient of friction was found to be similar for C2 and C6 cross-linkers for lower degrees of cross-linking.
At a higher degree of cross-linking, the friction was found to be
lower for the gel with longer cross-linkers.For the simulations,
the coefficient of friction was estimated
from the slope of the shear-stress-versus-normal-stress curves from
the initiation of deformation (D < 24) of polymer
brushes and gels. The shear-stress-versus-normal-stress curve in this
regime is predominantly linear, and a linear curve was fitted taking
into account the error at each point in the curve.[66]Figure b shows the coefficient of friction versus the degree of cross-linking
for different lengths of cross-linkers, as obtained from our simulations.
In qualitative agreement with the experiments, the CoF for all the
cross-linked systems is found to be higher than that of the un-cross-linked
system. The coefficient of friction was also found to increase with
the degree of cross-linking for systems having different lengths of
cross-linkers in a very similar manner as observed in the experiments.
Similar observations were made in the experimental results of Li et
al.[35] where the coefficient of friction
was found to increase with increasing cross-linker content in PAAm
hydrogel brushes.At a sufficiently high degree of cross-linking,
experiments and
simulations both show that shorter cross-linker lengths lead to larger
values of the CoF. This effect vanishes or is unclear at low degrees
of cross-linking. The cross-linkers tend to restrict the configurational
space for the chains, so that energetic effects become more relevant.
This effect increases with decreasing cross-linker length and increasing
degree of cross-linking. In the presence of cross-linkers, the brush
thus adopts a more compact density profile (Figure ), which tends to resist sliding. As a result,
the coefficient of friction increases with increasing degree of cross-linking.
Conclusions
Experimental and simulation studies
were performed to clarify the
effect of cross-linking on the tribological behavior of polymer brushes.
The tribological experiments on PGMA brushes and gels in DMF solvent
were performed against silica microspheres using the LFM technique.
The PGMA brushes showed a remarkable decrease in friction forces when
compared to bare silicon surfaces. We also observed a general increase
in friction with cross-linking for PGMA brushes in DMF. An increase
in the coefficient of friction was observed with increasing degree
of cross-linking, and a decreasing coefficient of friction was observed
with increasing length of cross-linkers beyond a certain degree of
cross-linking. AFM-based indentation of PGMA brushes and gels in DMF
solvent showed a decrease in their swelling ratio with increasing
degree of cross-linking and can very well explain the tribological
response of gels at different degrees of cross-linking for different
lengths of cross-linkers.Cross-linked polymer brushes were
successfully modeled using the
coarse-grained MD technique. The tribological behavior of cross-linked
polymer brushes under shear has been qualitatively compared with that
of un-cross-linked polymer brushes and also with our experimental
data. Simulations were performed at a constant shear velocity at different
separations in the presence of explicit solvent beads. Results were
presented in the form of shear stress versus normal stress. The coefficients
of friction were calculated from the slopes of shear-stress-versus-normal-stress
curves. The trends were consistent with the experimental observations:
increase in coefficient of friction with increasing cross-linking
degree and decrease in coefficient of friction with increasing cross-linker
length. We were able to explain these findings with the help of simulated
density profiles. As the degree of cross-linking increases, the polymer
concentration in the outer layer that can participate in brush-assisted
lubrication is reduced. In addition, cross-linked polymer brushes
are more resistant to shear, compared to their non-cross-linked counterparts.
We did not attempt to match the shear speeds to achieve a better quantitative
agreement between experiments and simulations. Rather, the present
simulations aim to study the underlying effects seen in the experiments
on a more qualitative level.This work can be extended by performing
studies over a wider range
of degree of cross-linking for various lengths of cross-linkers to
gain a better understanding of the influence of the length of cross-linkers
on the mechanical behavior of gels under shear.
Authors: Manjesh K Singh; Patrick Ilg; Rosa M Espinosa-Marzal; Martin Kröger; Nicholas D Spencer Journal: Langmuir Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Zhenyu Zhang; Andrew J Morse; Steven P Armes; Andrew L Lewis; Mark Geoghegan; Graham J Leggett Journal: Langmuir Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Manjesh K Singh; Patrick Ilg; Rosa M Espinosa-Marzal; Nicholas D Spencer; Martin Kröger Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 4.329