Joshua W Kandiah1, Vivian W Y Chan2, Jing Luo2, Flora Dong2, James P Nugent1, Bruce B Forster3,4. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2. Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 3. Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 4. Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not beneficial in patients with joint pain and concomitant osteoarthritis (OA). We attempt to determine whether evaluation of OA via X-rays can reduce inappropriate MRI and computed tomography (CT) arthrogram use. In our jurisdiction, CT arthrograms are used as surrogate tests because of MRI wait times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our intervention required patients ≥55 years of age scheduled for outpatient MRI of the knee/hip/shoulder at an urban hospital to have X-rays (weight bearing when appropriate) from within 1 year. Red flags (ie, neoplasm, infection) were identified for which MRI would be indicated regardless. Through review of radiographs on picture archiving and communication system/digital media and use of the validated Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) OA scale, radiologists assessed the presence and degree of OA. A finding of significant OA (KL > 2) without red flags would preclude MRI. Monthly averages of MRI and CT arthrogram examinations were measured 33 months before and 23 months following introduction of the intervention. RESULTS: The proportion of protocoled MRI requisitions that were avoided was 21%. If extrapolated to the province of British Columbia, 2419 of 11 700 examinations could have been prevented in the past year. The average monthly number of knee/hip/shoulder MRI examinations as a percentage of total MRI examinations decreased from 4.9% to 4.3% (P < .02) following the intervention. The average monthly number of knee/hip/shoulder CT arthrogram examinations decreased from 20.6 to 12.1 (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: We were able to decrease the number of MRI and CT arthrogram examinations in patients ≥55 years of age with joint pain by implementing an evaluation for OA via recent X-ray imaging.
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not beneficial in patients with joint pain and concomitant osteoarthritis (OA). We attempt to determine whether evaluation of OA via X-rays can reduce inappropriate MRI and computed tomography (CT) arthrogram use. In our jurisdiction, CT arthrograms are used as surrogate tests because of MRI wait times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our intervention required patients ≥55 years of age scheduled for outpatient MRI of the knee/hip/shoulder at an urban hospital to have X-rays (weight bearing when appropriate) from within 1 year. Red flags (ie, neoplasm, infection) were identified for which MRI would be indicated regardless. Through review of radiographs on picture archiving and communication system/digital media and use of the validated Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) OA scale, radiologists assessed the presence and degree of OA. A finding of significant OA (KL > 2) without red flags would preclude MRI. Monthly averages of MRI and CT arthrogram examinations were measured 33 months before and 23 months following introduction of the intervention. RESULTS: The proportion of protocoled MRI requisitions that were avoided was 21%. If extrapolated to the province of British Columbia, 2419 of 11 700 examinations could have been prevented in the past year. The average monthly number of knee/hip/shoulder MRI examinations as a percentage of total MRI examinations decreased from 4.9% to 4.3% (P < .02) following the intervention. The average monthly number of knee/hip/shoulder CT arthrogram examinations decreased from 20.6 to 12.1 (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: We were able to decrease the number of MRI and CT arthrogram examinations in patients ≥55 years of age with joint pain by implementing an evaluation for OA via recent X-ray imaging.