Ruth Vera1, Elena Mata2, Encarna González3, Ignacio Juez4, Vicente Alonso5, Patricia Iranzo6, Nieves P Martínez7, Carlos López8, José M Cabrera9, María J Safont10, Ana Ruiz-Casado11, Mercedes Salgado12, Beatriz González13, Pilar Escudero6, Fernando Rivera8, Carles Pericay9. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. ruth.vera.garcia@cfnavarra.es. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. 3. Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain. 4. Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain. 5. Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain. 6. Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain. 7. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain. 8. Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain. 9. Parc Taulí, Hospital Universitario de Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain. 10. Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain. 11. Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Majadahonda, Spain. 12. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain. 13. Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety data of aflibercept + FOLFIRI in wt RAS mCRC patients after progression to standard chemotherapy + anti-EGFR treatment. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study in real life conducted in wt RAS mCRC patients treated with FOLFIRI-aflibercept after progression to standard first line chemotherapy + anti-EGFR treatment. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients from 12 Spanish hospitals were enrolled. Median age is 60 years (62.5%/37.5%male/female). Primary tumor site is 24.1%/75.9% right/left-side colon, and 40.8% of patients had a prior resection. All patients had wild-type RAS tumors including 5% of patients with BRAF mutations and received anti-EGFR treatment. At the time aflibercept was initiated, ECOG PS is 0/1 in 96% of patients. Median number of FOLFIRI-aflibercept cycles is 12. Efficacy results: Overall response rate is 33%; progression-free survival (PFS) is 6.9 months (95%CI: 6.1-7.8). Primary tumor resection was the only significant variable related to PFS in the multivariate analysis. Median overall survival (OS) is 14.5 months (95%CI: 9.7-19.3). ECOG and number of metastatic sites were related to OS in multivariate analysis. About 54.1% of patients received a third-line therapy including TAS-102 (23%), regorafenib (18.5%), and capecitabine (9.2%). TOXICITY: Grade 3-4 toxicities were observed in 37.5% of the patients (hematologic 16.6%, hypertension 7.5%, asthenia 5.9%, and perforation 2.5%). Aflibercept dose was reduced in 18.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that patients with wt RAS mCRC who received an anti-EGFR as part of the first-line treatment achieved similar RR, PFS, OS, and toxicities to those reported in VELOUR trial. These results suggest that FOLFIRI-aflibercept after first-line treatment with anti-EGFR is an appropriated option for RAS wt mCRC.
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety data of aflibercept + FOLFIRI in wt RAS mCRC patients after progression to standard chemotherapy + anti-EGFR treatment. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study in real life conducted in wt RAS mCRC patients treated with FOLFIRI-aflibercept after progression to standard first line chemotherapy + anti-EGFR treatment. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients from 12 Spanish hospitals were enrolled. Median age is 60 years (62.5%/37.5%male/female). Primary tumor site is 24.1%/75.9% right/left-side colon, and 40.8% of patients had a prior resection. All patients had wild-type RAS tumors including 5% of patients with BRAF mutations and received anti-EGFR treatment. At the time aflibercept was initiated, ECOG PS is 0/1 in 96% of patients. Median number of FOLFIRI-aflibercept cycles is 12. Efficacy results: Overall response rate is 33%; progression-free survival (PFS) is 6.9 months (95%CI: 6.1-7.8). Primary tumor resection was the only significant variable related to PFS in the multivariate analysis. Median overall survival (OS) is 14.5 months (95%CI: 9.7-19.3). ECOG and number of metastatic sites were related to OS in multivariate analysis. About 54.1% of patients received a third-line therapy including TAS-102 (23%), regorafenib (18.5%), and capecitabine (9.2%). TOXICITY: Grade 3-4 toxicities were observed in 37.5% of the patients (hematologic 16.6%, hypertension 7.5%, asthenia 5.9%, and perforation 2.5%). Aflibercept dose was reduced in 18.3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that patients with wt RAS mCRC who received an anti-EGFR as part of the first-line treatment achieved similar RR, PFS, OS, and toxicities to those reported in VELOUR trial. These results suggest that FOLFIRI-aflibercept after first-line treatment with anti-EGFR is an appropriated option for RAS wt mCRC.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aflibercept; Antiangiogenics; Colorectal cancer; Metastatic colorectal cancer
Authors: Miriam Koopman; Ninja F Antonini; Joep Douma; Jaap Wals; Aafke H Honkoop; Frans Lg Erdkamp; Robert S de Jong; Cees J Rodenburg; Gerard Vreugdenhil; Olaf Jl Loosveld; Aart van Bochove; Harm Am Sinnige; Geert-Jan M Creemers; Margot Et Tesselaar; Peter H Th J Slee; Marjon Jbp Werter; Linda Mol; Otilia Dalesio; Cornelis Ja Punt Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-07-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Julian Walter Holch; Ingrid Ricard; Sebastian Stintzing; Dominik Paul Modest; Volker Heinemann Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Volker Heinemann; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Thomas Decker; Alexander Kiani; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Salah-Eddin Al-Batran; Tobias Heintges; Christian Lerchenmüller; Christoph Kahl; Gernot Seipelt; Frank Kullmann; Martina Stauch; Werner Scheithauer; Jörg Hielscher; Michael Scholz; Sebastian Müller; Hartmut Link; Norbert Niederle; Andreas Rost; Heinz-Gert Höffkes; Markus Moehler; Reinhard U Lindig; Dominik P Modest; Lisa Rossius; Thomas Kirchner; Andreas Jung; Sebastian Stintzing Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Josep Tabernero; Eric Van Cutsem; Radek Lakomý; Jana Prausová; Paul Ruff; Guy A van Hazel; Vladimir M Moiseyenko; David R Ferry; Joseph J McKendrick; Karen Soussan-Lazard; Soazig Chevalier; Carmen J Allegra Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Feliu; I Díez de Corcuera; J L Manzano; M Valladares-Ayerbes; J Alcaide; T García García; R Vera; J Sastre Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Elena Élez; María Auxiliadora Gómez-España; Cristina Grávalos; Pilar García-Alfonso; María José Ortiz-Morales; Ferrán Losa; Inmaculada Alés Díaz; Begoña Graña; Marta Toledano-Fonseca; Manuel Valladares-Ayerbes; Eduardo Polo; Mercedes Salgado; Eva Martínez de Castro; María José Safont; Antonieta Salud; Ana Ruiz-Casado; Josep Tabernero; María Del Carmen Riesco; Antonio Rodriguez-Ariza; Enrique Aranda Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: B González Astorga; F Salvà Ballabrera; E Aranda Aguilar; E Élez Fernández; P García-Alfonso; E González Flores; R Vera García; A Fernández Montes; A M López Muñoz; A Salud Salvia Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 3.405