| Literature DB >> 32061259 |
Bruno Pedraz-Petrozzi1,2, Osama Elyamany3,4,5, Christoph Rummel6,7, Christoph Mulert3,8,7,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, there has been growing evidence that an interaction exists between inflammation and the kynurenine pathway in schizophrenia. Additionally, many authors found microglial activation in cases of schizophrenia due to inflammatory mechanisms related mostly to an increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In order to gain new insights into the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, it is important to incorporate the latest published evidence concerning inflammatory mechanisms and kynurenine metabolism. This systematic review aims to collect reliable recent findings within the last decade supporting such a theory.Entities:
Keywords: Glutamic acid; Inflammation; Kynurenic acid; Kynurenine; Schizophrenia
Year: 2020 PMID: 32061259 PMCID: PMC7023707 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-020-1721-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Fig. 1Kynurenine pathway and tryptophan metabolism in the central nervous system. In the central nervous system (CNS), the kynurenine pathway starts by the conversion of tryptophan into kynurenine by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), IDO2, or tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO). Astrocytes can express both types of enzymes while microglia express only IDO [18, 23]. To a lesser extent, some neurons also possess IDO and/or TDO producing a minor portion of kynurenine [18]. Therefore, kynurenine is available in the CNS via the enzymatic activity of astrocytes, microglia, and some neurons as well as the kynurenine being actively transported into the brain by the large neutral amino acid transporter [19]. Next, kynurenine can follow either of two metabolic branches. First, it can be metabolized into kynurenic acid (KYNA) via kynurenine aminotransferase (KAT) [19, 24, 25] in astrocytes mainly [26] and neurons through irreversible transamination by KAT [27]. The other branch leads to the formation of quinolinic acid (QUIN) exclusively in both microglia and infiltrating macrophages. Both can express kynurenine 3-monooxygenase (KMO) which is absent in human astrocytes [28]. However, both astrocytes and neurons can further catabolize QUIN, produced by neighboring microglial cells, by the enzyme quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase (QPRTase) [23]. They can also form the neuroprotective picolinic acid (PIC) as they express the enzyme aminocarboxymuconate semialdehyde decarboxylase (ACMSD) [27]. Molecules: 3HAA, 3-hydroxyanthranilic; 3HK, 3-hydroxy-kynurenine; AA, anthranilic acid; ACMS, 2-amino-3-carboxymuconate semialdehyde; KYN, kynurenine; KYNA, kynurenic acid; NAD+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; PIC, picolinic acid; QUIN, quinolinic acid; TRP, tryptophan; XA, xanthurenic acid. Enzymes: 3-HAO, 3-hydroxyanthranlic acid oxygenase; ACMSD, aminocarboxymuconate semialdehyde decarboxylase; IDO, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; KAT, kynurenine aminotransferase; KMO, kynurenine 3-monooxy-genase; KYNU, kynureninase; QPRT, quinolinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase; TDO, tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase. *Excitation (examples): tryptophan, T-lymphocytes A4, IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ, TNF α. *Inhibition (examples): IL-4, Th2 immunity response, antidepressants, antipsychotics
Fig. 2PRISMA flow diagram. *Non-original articles comprise literature reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and conference abstracts. From Moher et al. [39]
Included articles and their sociodemographic data
| Publication | Sample size | Age (years) | Male/female ratio | BMI (kg/m2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author, year | Controls | Patients | Controls | Patients | Controls | Patients | Control | Patients |
| A. Immunoglobulins | ||||||||
| Kanchanatawan et al. 2017 [ | 40 | 84 clinically stable Sz outpatients | 37.4 (12.8) | Without, with physiosomatic symptoms 40.0 (11.1), 41.8 (11.0) | 10/30 | Without, with physiosomatic symptoms 22/14, 21/22 | 24.0 (4.3) | Without, with physiosomatic symptoms 24.7 (5.9), 24.5 (4.5) |
| Kanchanatawan et al. 2018a [ | 40 | 80 Sz outpatients, 40 deficit, and 40 non-deficit patients | 37.9 (12.8) | Non-deficit 41.3 (10.8), deficit 40.9 (11.9) | 10/30 | Non-deficit 22/18, deficit 21/19 | 24.0 (4.3) | Non-deficit 26.0 (5.2), deficit 22.9 (4.6) |
| Kanchanatawan et al. 2018b [ | 40 | 80 Sz outpatients, 40 deficit, and 40 non-deficit patients | 37.9 (12.8) | Non-deficit 41.3 (10.8), deficit 40.9 (11.4) | 10/30 | Non-deficit 22/18, deficit 21/19 | 24.0 (4.3) | Non-deficit 26.0 (5.2), deficit 22.9 (4.6) |
| Bechter et al. 2010 [ | 4100 | Inpatient Sz = 39, inpatient Af = 24 | ND | Sz = 33.2 (13.1), Af = 45.4 (9.8) | ND | 34/29 | ND | ND |
| B. Interleukins | ||||||||
| Szymona et al. 2017 [ | 45 | 51 Sz inpatients due to acute relapse at time of admission, after a 4-week treatment and remission | 24.2 (5.6) | 26.9 (8.2) | 23/22 | 32/19 | 22.14 ± (5.66) | 25.24 ± (4.76) |
| Barry et al. 2009 [ | 36 | 34 outpatients (Sz or SzA disorder) | 33.7 (6.6) | 37.3 (8.9) | 26/10 | 26/8 | 25 (4.0) | 28 (4.3) |
| Kim et al. 2009 [ | 174 | 71 acute admitted medication-naïve psychotic patients or medication-free for at least 4 months assessed on admission and Discharge after 6 weeks. | 32.49 (10.69) | 33.9 (12.2) | 78/96 | 32/39 | 22.11 (2.9) | 23.0 (3.9) |
| Schwieler et al. 2015 [ | 37 | 23 Sz outpatients | 23.0 (22.0–25.5)* | 35.0 (32.0–41.0)* | 23/14 | 15/8 | 23.0 (22.0–26.0)* | 26.2 (22.1–27.2)* |
| Kegel et al. 2017 [ | Outpatient (MZ) | Outpatient (DZ) | (MZ) | (DZ) | (MZ) | (DZ) | (MZ) | (DZ) |
| 12 (2 single twins) | 11 (one single twin) | 57.0 (6.4) | 52.9 (7.5) | 7/5 | 3/8 | 27.5 (6.9) | 29.3 (7.9) | |
| C. C-reactive protein | ||||||||
| Wurfel et al. 2017 [ | 92 | Inpatient MDD ( | 32.3 (10.4) | MDD 38.8 (13.8), BD 40.2 (11.0), SzA 39.0 13.0), Sz 38.9 12.9) | 33/59 | MDD 16/19, BD 16/37, SzA 24/40, Sz 17/4 | 27 (6) | MDD 30 (9), BD 30 (8), SzA 30 (9), Sz 28 (6) |
All age and BMI results are shown as mean (SD) except values indicated by the asterisk symbol, data are represented as median (interquartile range)
Abbreviations: 3HK 3-OH-kynurenine, AA anthranilic acid, Af affective disorder, BPRS the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, CANTAB The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, CDSS Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, CRP C-reactive protein, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Text Revision, DZ dizygotic twins, FF Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Rating Scale, GAF Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, HAM-A Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAM-D Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, ICD 10 The International Classification of Diseases Tenth Edition, IFN- interferon-, Ig immunoglobulin, IL- interleukin-, KYN kynurenine, KYNA kynurenic acid, MDD major depressive disorder, MINI Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, MZ monozygotic twins, ND not determined, PA picolinic acid, PANSS The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, QUIN quinolinic acid, SANS Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, SAPS Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, SCID-I/II for DSM-IV Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV Axis I/II Disorders, SDS Schedule for Deficit Syndrome, sIL-2R soluble interleukin-2 receptor, SPQ-B Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire Brief, Sz schizophrenia, SzA schizo-affective disorder, TGF- transforming growth factor, TNFα tumor necrosis factorα, Trp Tryptophan, TRYCATs tryptophan catabolites, XA xanthurenic acid, YMRS The Young Mania Rating Scale
Included articles and their study design
| Publication | Study design | Country | Clinical scales | Investigation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author, year | Medium | Markers | |||
| A. Immunoglobulins | |||||
| Kanchanatawan et al. 2017 [ | Observational cross-sectional with healthy controls | Thailand | DSM IV, FF, PANSS, SANS, SDS, HAM-D, HAM-A, CANTAB | Blood | 3HK, KYNA, QUIN, AA, XA, PA, and IgA and IgM responses to these six TRYCATs |
| Kanchanatawan et al. 2018a [ | Observational cross-sectional with healthy controls | Thailand | DSM-IV-TR, Thai version of MINI, SDS, SANS, PANSS, BPRS | Blood | 3HK, KA, QUIN, AA, XA, PA, and IgA and IgM responses to these six TRYCATs |
| Kanchanatawan et al. 2018b [ | Observational cross-sectional with healthy controls | Thailand | DSM-IV, SDS, SANS, PANSS, BPRS | Blood | 3HK, KYNA, QUIN, AA, XA, PA, and IgA responses to these six TRYCATs |
| Bechter et al. 2010 [ | Observational cross-sectional with healthy controls | Germany | ICD-10 | Blood and CSF | KYN, Trp, albumin, IgG, IgA, IgM, oligoclonal IgG |
| B. Interleukins | |||||
| Szymona et al. 2017 [ | Observational prospective case-control study | Poland | ICD-10 (F20), SAPS, SANS, PANSS | Blood | KYNA, 3-HK, sIL-2R, IFN-α, IL-4 |
| Barry et al. 2009 [ | Observational cross-sectional with healthy controls | Ireland | DSM-IV, SCID-I for DSM-IV, SAPS, SANS, CDSS | Blood | L-Trp, KYN, 3HK, KYNA, 3-hydroxy-anthranilic acid, XA and 3-nitro- |
| Kim et al. 2009 [ | Observational prospective case-control study | Korea | DSM IV, PANSS | Blood | Trp and KYN as well as IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, TGF-β1 |
| Schwieler et al. 2015 [ | Observational cross-sectional with healthy controls | Sweden | DSMIV, BPRS, GAF | CSF | Cytokines: IL1β, IL2, IL4, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL18, TNFα, IFNα2a, and IFNγ as well as KYNA, KYN, and Trp |
| Human astrocyte culture | Effects of IL-6 on KYN and KYNA | ||||
| Kegel et al. 2017 [ | Observational cross-sectional with healthy control twins | Sweden | SCID-I, SCID-II, SANS, SAPS, SPQ-B, HAM-D, YMRS, GAF | CSF | KYNA, QUIN, Trp, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, albumin |
| Blood | CRP and albumin | ||||
| C. C-reactive protein | |||||
| Wurfel et al. 2017 [ | Observational cross-sectional with healthy controls | USA | DSM-IV, HAM-D, YMRS, BPRS version 4.0, CORE assessment of psychomotor change | Blood | High-sensitivity CRP, Trp, KYN, KYNA, 3HK |
Abbreviations: 3HK 3-OH-kynurenine, AA anthranilic acid, Af affective disorder, BPRS The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, CANTAB The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, CDSS Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, CRP C-reactive protein, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Text Revision, DZ dizygotic twins, FF Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Rating Scale, GAF Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, HAM-A Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAM-D Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, ICD 10 The International Classification of Diseases Tenth Edition, IFN- interferon-, Ig immunoglobulin, IL- interleukin-, KYN kynurenine, KYNA kynurenic acid, MDD major depressive disorder, MINI Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, MZ monozygotic twins, ND not determined, PA picolinic acid, PANSS The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, QUIN quinolinic acid, SANS Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, SAPS Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, SCID-I/II for DSM-IV Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV Axis I/II Disorders, SDS Schedule for Deficit Syndrome, sIL-2R soluble interleukin-2 receptor, SPQ-B Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire Brief, Sz schizophrenia, SzA schizo-affective disorder, TGF- transforming growth factor, TNFα tumor necrosis factorα, Trp Tryptophan, TRYCATs tryptophan catabolites, XA xanthurenic acid, YMRS The Young Mania Rating Scale
Included articles and their main Findings
| Author, year | Sample size | Main findings | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Patients | ||
| A. Immunoglobulins | |||
| Kanchanatawan et al. 2017 [ | 40 | 84 clinically stable Sz outpatients | - Physiosomatic symptoms were significantly associated with IgA/IgM responses to TRYCATs, including increased IgA responses to 3 HK, picolinic acid, and xanthurenic acid and lowered IgA responses to QUIN acid and AA |
| Kanchanatawan et al. 2018a [ | 40 | 80 Sz outpatients, 40 deficit, and 40 non-deficit patients | - Deficit schizophrenia increased TRYCAT vs. controls and non-deficit - Both schizophrenia subgroups showed increased IgA responses to 3-OH-kynurenine - Negative symptoms positively correlated with increased IgA responses directed against picolinic acid and inversely with anthranilic acid without significant associations between positive ones and IgA responses to TRYCATs |
| Kanchanatawan et al. 2018b [ | |||
| Bechter et al. 2010 [ | 4100 | Inpatient Sz = 39, inpatient Af = 24 | - Intrathecal immune response in 9 patients (4 with schizophrenia) - Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in 18 patients (9 of them with schizophrenia) - Neopterin concentrations increased in 14 patients (8 of them with schizophrenia) - Absence of any significant changes in tryptophan nor kynurenine metabolites |
| B. Interleukins | |||
| Szymona et al. 2017 [ | 45 | 51 Sz inpatients | - KYNA/3-HK ratio and IL-4 levels decreased - Negative correlation between IFN-α and 3-HK level - A positive correlation between KYNA and IFN-α |
| Barry et al. 2009 [ | 36 | 34 outpatients | - Significant higher kynurenine/tryptophan ratio in patients without significant correlation with IFN-γ values. |
| Kim et al. 2009 [ | 174 | 71 medication-free assessed on admission and discharge after 6 weeks | At admission: - Th1-specific IFN-γ and TNF-α, and Th2-related IL-6 were higher - Tryptophan was significantly lower - Th1-related IL-2 and Th2-specific IL-4 were significantly lower - Th1/Th2 ratio ([IFN-γ]/[IL-4]) correlated positively with the tryptophan breakdown index ([kynurenine]/plasma [tryptophan]) After six weeks of treatment: - A significant reduction of plasma IL-6 and TNF- α - Both mean tryptophan and kynurenine levels were significantly increased |
| Schwieler et al. 2015 [ | 37 | 23 Sz | - Correlation between IL-6 and KYNA-production |
| Kegel et al. 2017 [ | Outpatient (MZ) | Outpatient (DZ) | - Correlation between IL-8 and QUIN - Correlation between TNF-α and QUIN |
| 12 (2 single twins) | 11 (one single twin) | ||
| C. C-reactive protein | |||
| Wurfel et al. 2017 [ | 92 | Inpatient MDD ( | Sz patients versus MDD, BD and SZA subgroups showed no significant difference in KYNA/QUIN and compared to healthy controls |
Abbreviations: 3HK 3-OH-kynurenine, AA anthranilic acid, Af affective disorder, BPRS The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, CANTAB The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, CDSS Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, CRP C-reactive protein, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Text Revision, DZ dizygotic twins, FF Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Rating Scale, GAF Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, HAM-A Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAM-D Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, ICD 10 The International Classification of Diseases Tenth Edition, IFN- interferon-, Ig immunoglobulin, IL- interleukin-, KYN Kynurenine, KYNA kynurenic acid, MDD major depressive disorder, MINI Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, MZ monozygotic twins, ND not determined, PA picolinic acid, PANSS The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, QUIN quinolinic acid, SANS Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, SAPS Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, SCID-I/II for DSM-IV Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV Axis I/II Disorders, SDS Schedule for Deficit Syndrome, sIL-2R soluble interleukin-2 receptor, SPQ-B Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire Brief, Sz schizophrenia, SzA schizo-affective disorder, TGF-transforming growth factor, TNFα tumor necrosis factorα, Trp Tryptophan, TRYCATs tryptophan catabolites, XA xanthurenic acid, YMRS The Young Mania Rating Scale
Quality assessment for the included studies
| Year | Author | Sample Size | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Q12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Patients | ||||||||||||||
| A. Immunoglobulins | |||||||||||||||
| 2017 | Kanchanatawan et al. | 40 | 84 clinically stable Sz outpatients | Yes | CD | NR | Yes | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | NA | Yes | NR | Yes |
| 2018a | Kanchanatawan et al. | 40 | 80 Sz outpatients, 40 deficit, and 40 non-deficit patients | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes |
| 2018b | Kanchanatawan et al. | 40 | 80 Sz outpatients, 40 deficit, and 40 non-deficit patients | Yes | CD | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NR | CD | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 2010 | Bechter et al. | 4100 | Inpatient Sz = 39, inpatient Af = 24 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | NA | No |
| B. Interleukins | |||||||||||||||
| 2017 | Szymona et al. | 45 | 51 Sz inpatients due to acute relapse at time of admission, after a 4-week treatment and remission | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 2009 | Barry et al. | 36 | 34 outpatients (Sz or SzA disorder | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes |
| 2009 | Kim et al. | 174 | 71 acute admitted medication-naïve psychotic patients or medication-free for at least 4 months assessed on admission and discharge after 6 weeks. | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | Yes | Yes | NR | CD | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 2015 | Schwieler et al. | 37 | 23 Sz outpatients | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes |
| 2017 | Kegel et al. | Outpatient (MZ) | Outpatient (DZ) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes |
| 12 (2 single twins) | 11 (one single twin) | ||||||||||||||
| C. C-reactive protein | |||||||||||||||
| 2017 | Wurfel et al. | 92 | Inpatient MDD ( | Yes | CD | NR | Yes | Yes | Yes | NR | CD | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Abbreviations: CD cannot determine, NA not applicable, NR not reported, Af affective disorder, DZ dizygotic twins, MDD major depressive disorder, MZ monozygotic twins, Sz schizophrenia, SzA schizo-affective disorder
Questions: Q1. Was the research question or objective in this paper clearly stated? Q2. Was the study population clearly specified and defined? Q3. Was the participation rate of eligible persons at least 50%? Q4. Were all the subjects selected or recruited from the same or similar populations (including the same time period)? Were inclusion and exclusion criteria for being in the study prespecified and applied uniformly to all participants? Q5. Was a sample size justification, power description, or variance and effect estimates provided? Q6. For the analyses in this paper, were the exposure(s) of interest measured prior to the outcome(s) being measured? Q7. Was the timeframe sufficient so that one could reasonably expect to see an association between exposure and outcome if it existed? Q8. For exposures that can vary in amount or level, did the study examine different levels of the exposure as related to the outcome (e.g., categories of exposure, or exposure measured as continuous variable)? Q9. Were the exposure measures (independent variables) clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants? Q10. Was the exposure(s) assessed more than once over time? Q11. Were the outcome measures (dependent variables) clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants? Q12. Were the outcome assessors blinded to the exposure status of participants? Q13. Was loss to follow-up after baseline 20% or less? Q14. Were key potential confounding variables measured and adjusted statistically for their impact on the relationship between exposure(s) and outcome(s)?
Taken from: The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Study Quality Assessment Tools. Available at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools