Jana C Riedl1, Alexander K Schuster2, Urs Vossmerbaeumer2. 1. Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. Jana.riedl@unimedizin-mainz.de. 2. Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The implantation of the Artificial Iris® (Human Optics AG, Erlangen, Germany) is used for pupil and iris reconstruction in patients with partial or complete aniridia. So far, only a few case reports and short-term results are available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis is to present the various indications as well as the functional result. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This retrospective consecutive case study included 51 eyes of 50 patients with implantation of an Artificial Iris® for pupillary reconstruction. All operations were performed by the same ophthalmic surgeon (UV) at the University Eye Clinic Mainz. The initial findings were placed in relation to the indications and the functional results were investigated. RESULTS: In this study 51 eyes of 50 patients with a mean age of 57 ± 16.5 years (16 women and 34 men) were analyzed. While the majority of the patients suffered from a traumatic partial or complete aniridia, the minority showed congenital defects. The visual acuity could be improved in 53% of the patients (p = 0.0001) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This analysis highlights the various and diverse indications for implanting the Artificial Iris®. Hereby, a gain in visual acuity is not invariably the primary objective but more often reduction of glare as well as cosmetic rehabilitation, as the eyes are severely damaged in many cases. The long-term results are currently being analyzed in a study and will soon be published.
BACKGROUND: The implantation of the Artificial Iris® (Human Optics AG, Erlangen, Germany) is used for pupil and iris reconstruction in patients with partial or complete aniridia. So far, only a few case reports and short-term results are available in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis is to present the various indications as well as the functional result. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This retrospective consecutive case study included 51 eyes of 50 patients with implantation of an Artificial Iris® for pupillary reconstruction. All operations were performed by the same ophthalmic surgeon (UV) at the University Eye Clinic Mainz. The initial findings were placed in relation to the indications and the functional results were investigated. RESULTS: In this study 51 eyes of 50 patients with a mean age of 57 ± 16.5 years (16 women and 34 men) were analyzed. While the majority of the patients suffered from a traumatic partial or complete aniridia, the minority showed congenital defects. The visual acuity could be improved in 53% of the patients (p = 0.0001) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This analysis highlights the various and diverse indications for implanting the Artificial Iris®. Hereby, a gain in visual acuity is not invariably the primary objective but more often reduction of glare as well as cosmetic rehabilitation, as the eyes are severely damaged in many cases. The long-term results are currently being analyzed in a study and will soon be published.
Authors: Daniel Rudolf Muth; Siegfried Georg Priglinger; Mehdi Shajari; Thomas Christian Kreutzer; Wolfgang Johann Mayer Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Date: 2022-03-25