| Literature DB >> 32060556 |
Johanna Hietamäki1, Louise C Gregory2, Sandy Ayoub3, Anna-Pauliina Iivonen4, Kirsi Vaaralahti4, Xiaonan Liu5, Nina Brandstack6, Andrew J Buckton7, Tiina Laine1, Johanna Känsäkoski4, Matti Hero1, Päivi J Miettinen1, Markku Varjosalo5, Emma Wakeling3, Mehul T Dattani2,8,9, Taneli Raivio1,4.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Congenital pituitary hormone deficiencies with syndromic phenotypes and/or familial occurrence suggest genetic hypopituitarism; however, in many such patients the underlying molecular basis of the disease remains unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Sonic Hedgehog signaling; TBC1D32; ciliopathy; hypopituitarism; retinal dystrophy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32060556 PMCID: PMC7138537 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 0021-972X Impact factor: 6.134
Figure 1.A: The pedigrees of our patients with hypopituitarism and biallelic TBC1D32 variants. I: the Finnish pedigree; II: the Pakistani pedigree. Patients I.3 and I.5 carried compound heterozygous and patients II.8 and II.9 carried homozygous variants in TBC1D32. The parents were heterozygous carriers of the respective variants. B: (i) and (ii) the MRIs of the 2 Finnish patients. Upper row, Patient I.3: Sagittal (a) and coronal (b) T1 images without contrast enhancement. The sella turcica and the pituitary gland are not identifiable. Neurohypophyseal bright tissue is seen near the tuber cinereum (arrow). Lower row, Patient I.5: Sagittal (a) and axial (b) T1 images without contrast enhancement. The sella turcica and the pituitary gland are absent. Potentially neurohypophyseal bright tissue is seen near the tuber cinereum (arrow). (iii) MRI of patient II.8. Upper row, Patient II.8: Sagittal (a) T1 image showing partial agenesis of corpus callosum (CC), small interhemispheric lipoma (L), small anterior pituitary (AP), and small ectopic posterior pituitary (PP). Lower row: coronal image showing dysplasia of the cerebellar vermis (arrow) with an abnormal left cerebellum. The “molar tooth” sign of Joubert syndrome is also shown (filled arrow). C: Clinical photos of the patients. (i) Patient I.3 at 2.4 years of age. Note the prominent forehead and the low-set, posteriorly rotated ears; (ii) Patient I.5 presented with prominent forehead, large anterior fontanelle, and low-set ears in infancy; (iii) Patient I.5 at 10.5 years of age; (iv) Patient II.8 in infancy showing a prominent forehead with hypertelorism, low-set ears, flat nasal bridge and anteverted nares; (v) Patient II.8 at 5.5 years of age.
Biochemical testing of the pituitary hormone secretion in Patients I.3 and I.5
| Patient I.3 | Patient I.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
| Serum IGF1 (nmol/L) | 8 | 7 [na] | 20 | <3 [7–43] |
| Fasting serum GH during hypoglycemia (ug/L) | 8 | <0.03 | 6 | 0.20 |
| Maximum arginine-stimulated serum GH (ug/L) | - | NA | 26 | 0.23 |
|
| ||||
| Plasma ACTH (ng/L) | 14 | <5a [10–50] | 11 | 15a [<46] |
| Serum cortisol (nmol/L) | 1 | <20 [150–650] | 11 | 121a [30–632] |
| Maximum synacthen-stimulated plasma cortisol (ACTH neo test) (nmol/L) | 1 | <20 | 11 | 638a |
|
| ||||
| Serum free T4 (pmol/L) | 4 | 5.3 [9–19] | 20 | 9.9 [8–25] |
| Serum TSH (mU/L) | 4 | 0.002 [0.6–10] | 20 | 2.65 [0.6–10] |
| Serum TSH during TRH provocation test (at 0/20/60 min) (mU/L) | NA | 26 | 2.58/4.63/4.73 | |
|
| ||||
| Serum inhibin B (ng/L) | 2 | 175 | - | NA |
| Serum FSH (IU/L) | 18 | <0.10 | - | NA |
| Maximum serum FSH during GnRH provocation test (IU/L) | 18 | 0.2 | - | NA |
| Serum LH (IU/L) | 18 | <0.10 | - | NA |
| Maximum serum LH during GnRH provocation test (IU/L) | 18 | <0.10 | - | NA |
Abbreviations: NA, not available; NR, normal range.
aMeasured during exogenous cortisone treatment.
Figure 2.Human expression of TBC1D32 mRNA transcripts in transverse brain sections at different developmental stages during embryogenesis. A: There is no clear expression in the hypothalamus, Rathke’s pouch, or elsewhere in the brain when comparing results using the antisense probe and the sense probe at Carnegie stage (CS) 19. B: At CS20 there may be some partial expression in the hypothalamus using the antisense probe; however, staining is very similar to the Rathke’s pouch and the hypothalamus when using the control sense probe, where some background staining is noted. C: At CS23, there is partial expression in the trigeminal ganglia, in Rathke’s pouch, and along the hypothalamus when comparing the antisense and control sense probes. D: There is strong expression in the hindbrain, in particular the thalamus, with some expression also seen in the choroid plexus. Abbreviations: CP, choroid plexus; Hyp, hypothalamus; RP, Rathke’s pouch; T, thalamus; Tri, trigeminal ganglia.
Figure 3.Reverse transcriptase PCR analysis of TBC1D32 expression. A 310-bp fragment of transcript encoding TBC1D32 was amplified from human pituitary gland cDNA and from hypothalamic cDNA (QUICK-Clone pituitary cDNA, Takarabio, 1.5µl / reaction; Hypothalamus Marathon®-Ready cDNA, Takarabio, 1.5ul / reaction). Human GAPDH was used as a reference gene. The PCR products were visualized on a 1.0% agarose gel. Abbreviations: c, negative control without DNA template; ht, hypothalamus; p, pituitary gland.
Figure 4.The functional grouping of the high confidence interacting proteins of TBC1D32. Interactome analysis reveals known and novel interactions for TBC1D32. AP-MS and BioID analysis of TBC1D32 identified 81 high-confidence protein–protein interactions (yellow lines represent interaction detected by AP-MS approach; green lines represent interactions detected by BioID approach; overlap of the 2 purification methods is shown with grey lines; known interaction is shown with a dashed line). The interacting proteins are grouped based on their molecular functions/complexes.
Summary of clinical features in patients with biallelic mutations in TBC1D32
| Subject I.3 | Subject I.5 | Subject II.8 | Subject II.9 | Adly et al (2014) ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3 years | 10 years | 5 years | 20 weeks gestation | 6 months |
|
| Male | Female | Female | Female | Male |
|
| |||||
| Bifid tongue/midline tongue groove | - | - | + | - | - |
| Highly arched/cleft palate | - | - | + | - | + |
| Abnormal dentition | - | + | - | NA | - |
|
| |||||
| Hypertelorism | + | + | + | - | + |
| Midline cleft lip | - | - | - | + | + |
| Upturned nose | + | + | + | NA | NA |
| Choanal stenosis/atresia | - | - | + | NA | + |
|
| |||||
| Polydactyly | - | - | + | - | + |
| Syndactyly | - | + | - | - | - |
| Sandal gap deformity | - | + | - | - | NA |
| Lower limb length difference | NA | + | - | NA | NA |
|
| |||||
| Cerebellar vermis hypoplasia | - | - | + | NA | + |
| Hypothalamic hamartoma | - | - | - | NA | - |
| Agenesis of the corpus callosum | - | - | + | NA | + |
| Pituitary abnormalities | No anterior pituitary (ACTH, TSH, GH, and FSH/LH deficiencies), ectopic posterior pituitary | No anterior pituitary (GH, TSH deficiencies), ectopic posterior pituitary | Anterior pituitary hypoplasia (GH deficiency) | NA | No pituitary gland |
| Basal ganglia abnormalities | - | - | + | NA | - |
| Brainstem abnormalities | - | - | + | NA | - |
| Communicating hydrocephalus | + | - | - | NA | - |
|
| |||||
| Microphtalmia | - | - | - | NA | + |
| Retinal dystrophy | NA | Progressive | - | NA | - |
| Coloboma | - | - | - | NA | + |
| Visual acuity | NA | Reduced | Reduced | NA | NA |
|
| |||||
| Microcephaly | - | - | - | - | + |
| Developmental delay | Global | Motoric | Global | NA | NA |
| Epileptic seizures | - | - | - | NA | + |
| Congenital heart disease | - | - | - | - | + |
| Abnormal genitalia | + | - | - | - | + |
| Intestinal malrotation | - | - | - | + | - |
| Neuromuscular scoliosis | NA | + | - | NA | NA |
| Chronic secretory otitis media | + | + | + | NA | NA |
Abbreviations: +, present; -, not present; NA, not available.
Age at death.