Alexei Zelenev1, Jianghong Li2, Portia Shea1, Robert Hecht3, Frederick L Altice1,3,4. 1. AIDS Program, Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 2. Institute for Community Research, Hartford, Connecticut, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. 4. Centre of Excellence for Research in AIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment as prevention (TasP) strategies can contribute to HCV microelimination, yet complimentary interventions such as opioid agonist therapies (OAT) with methadone or buprenorphine and syringe services programs (SSPs) may improve the prevention impact. This modeling study estimates the impact of scaling up the combination of OAT and SSPs with HCV TasP in a network of people who inject drugs (PWID) in the United States. METHODS: Using empirical data from Hartford, Connecticut, we deployed a stochastic block model to simulate an injection network of 1574 PWID. We used a susceptible-infected model for HCV and human immunodeficiency virus to evaluate the effectiveness of several HCV TasP strategies, including in combination with OAT and SSP scale-up, over 20 years. RESULTS: At the highest HCV prevalence (75%), when OAT coverage is increased from 10% to 40%, combined with HCV treatment of 10% per year and SSP scale up to 40%, the time to achieve microelimination is reduced from 18.4 to 11.6 years. At the current HCV prevalence (60%), HCV TasP strategies as low as 10% coverage per year may achieve HCV microelimination within 10 years, with minimal impact from additional OAT scale-up. Strategies based on mass initial HCV treatment (50 per 100 PWID the first year followed by 5 per 100 PWID thereafter) were most effective in settings with HCV prevalence of 60% or lower. CONCLUSIONS: Scale-up of HCV TasP is the most effective strategy for microelimination of HCV. OAT scale-up, however, scale-up may be synergistic toward achieving microelimination goals when HCV prevalence exceeds 60% and when HCV treatment coverage is 10 per 100 PWID per year or lower.
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment as prevention (TasP) strategies can contribute to HCV microelimination, yet complimentary interventions such as opioid agonist therapies (OAT) with methadone or buprenorphine and syringe services programs (SSPs) may improve the prevention impact. This modeling study estimates the impact of scaling up the combination of OAT and SSPs with HCV TasP in a network of people who inject drugs (PWID) in the United States. METHODS: Using empirical data from Hartford, Connecticut, we deployed a stochastic block model to simulate an injection network of 1574 PWID. We used a susceptible-infected model for HCV and human immunodeficiency virus to evaluate the effectiveness of several HCV TasP strategies, including in combination with OAT and SSP scale-up, over 20 years. RESULTS: At the highest HCV prevalence (75%), when OAT coverage is increased from 10% to 40%, combined with HCV treatment of 10% per year and SSP scale up to 40%, the time to achieve microelimination is reduced from 18.4 to 11.6 years. At the current HCV prevalence (60%), HCV TasP strategies as low as 10% coverage per year may achieve HCV microelimination within 10 years, with minimal impact from additional OAT scale-up. Strategies based on mass initial HCV treatment (50 per 100 PWID the first year followed by 5 per 100 PWID thereafter) were most effective in settings with HCV prevalence of 60% or lower. CONCLUSIONS: Scale-up of HCV TasP is the most effective strategy for microelimination of HCV. OAT scale-up, however, scale-up may be synergistic toward achieving microelimination goals when HCV prevalence exceeds 60% and when HCV treatment coverage is 10 per 100 PWID per year or lower.
Authors: Megan G Hofmeister; Elizabeth M Rosenthal; Laurie K Barker; Eli S Rosenberg; Meredith A Barranco; Eric W Hall; Brian R Edlin; Jonathan Mermin; John W Ward; A Blythe Ryerson Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-11-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Hannah Fraser; Claudia Vellozzi; Thomas J Hoerger; Jennifer L Evans; Alex H Kral; Jennifer Havens; April M Young; Jack Stone; Senad Handanagic; Susan Hariri; Carolina Barbosa; Matthew Hickman; Alyssa Leib; Natasha K Martin; Lina Nerlander; Henry F Raymond; Kimberly Page; Jon Zibbell; John W Ward; Peter Vickerman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: David P Durham; Laura A Skrip; Robert Douglas Bruce; Silvia Vilarinho; Elamin H Elbasha; Alison P Galvani; Jeffrey P Townsend Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Margaret Hellard; David A Rolls; Rachel Sacks-Davis; Garry Robins; Philippa Pattison; Peter Higgs; Campbell Aitken; Emma McBryde Journal: Hepatology Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Natasha K Martin; Peter Vickerman; Jason Grebely; Margaret Hellard; Sharon J Hutchinson; Viviane D Lima; Graham R Foster; John F Dillon; David J Goldberg; Gregory J Dore; Matthew Hickman Journal: Hepatology Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Phyllis Losikoff; Jordon D Bosse; Stephen A Martin; Amanda Wilson; Lisa M Chiodo Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-09-14 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Anishaa Sivakumar; Lynn Madden; Elizabeth DiDomizio; Anthony Eller; Merceditas Villanueva; Frederick L Altice Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2021-12-20