Literature DB >> 32060171

Distance and Direction Codes Underlie Navigation of a Novel Semantic Space in the Human Brain.

Simone Viganò1, Manuela Piazza2.   

Abstract

A recent proposal posits that humans might use the same neuronal machinery to support the representation of both spatial and nonspatial information, organizing concepts and memories using spatial codes. This view predicts that the same neuronal coding schemes characterizing navigation in the physical space (tuned to distance and direction) should underlie navigation of abstract semantic spaces, even if they are categorical and labeled by symbols. We constructed an artificial semantic environment by parsing a bidimensional audiovisual object space into four labeled categories. Before and after a nonspatial symbolic categorization training, 25 adults (15 females) were presented with pseudorandom sequences of objects and words during a functional MRI session. We reasoned that subsequent presentations of stimuli (either objects or words) referring to different categories implied implicit movements in the novel semantic space, and that such movements subtended specific distances and directions. Using whole-brain fMRI adaptation and searchlight model-based representational similarity analysis, we found evidence of both distance-based and direction-based responses in brain regions typically involved in spatial navigation: the medial prefrontal cortex and the right entorhinal cortex (EHC). After training, both regions encoded the distances between concepts, making it possible to recover a faithful bidimensional representation of the semantic space directly from their multivariate activity patterns, whereas the right EHC also exhibited a periodic modulation as a function of traveled direction. Our results indicate that the brain regions and coding schemes supporting relations and movements between spatial locations in mammals are "recycled" in humans to represent a bidimensional multisensory conceptual space during a symbolic categorization task.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The hippocampal formation and the medial prefrontal cortex of mammals represent the surrounding physical space by encoding distances and directions between locations. Recent works suggested that humans use the same neural machinery to organize their memories as points of an internal map of experiences. We asked whether the same brain regions and neural codes supporting spatial navigation are recruited when humans use language to organize their knowledge of the world in categorical semantic representations. Using fMRI, we show that the medial prefrontal cortex and the entorhinal portion of the hippocampal formation represent the distances and the movement directions between concepts of a novel audiovisual semantic space, and that it was possible to reconstruct, from neural data, their relationships in memory.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concepts; Semantic; entorhinal cortex; navigation; ventro-medial prefrontal cortex

Year:  2020        PMID: 32060171      PMCID: PMC7096136          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1849-19.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

Review 1.  Interplay of hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in memory.

Authors:  Alison R Preston; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Improved BOLD detection in the medial temporal region using parallel imaging and voxel volume reduction.

Authors:  Patrick S F Bellgowan; Peter A Bandettini; Peter van Gelderen; Alex Martin; Jerzy Bodurka
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The neuro-cognitive representations of symbols: the case of concrete words.

Authors:  Valentina Borghesani; Manuela Piazza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  What Is a Cognitive Map? Organizing Knowledge for Flexible Behavior.

Authors:  Timothy E J Behrens; Timothy H Muller; James C R Whittington; Shirley Mark; Alon B Baram; Kimberly L Stachenfeld; Zeb Kurth-Nelson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; J Dostrovsky
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Hexadirectional coding of visual space in human entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Matthias Nau; Tobias Navarro Schröder; Jacob L S Bellmund; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The representation of biological classes in the human brain.

Authors:  Andrew C Connolly; J Swaroop Guntupalli; Jason Gors; Michael Hanke; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Yu-Chien Wu; Hervé Abdi; James V Haxby
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A map of abstract relational knowledge in the human hippocampal-entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Mona M Garvert; Raymond J Dolan; Timothy Ej Behrens
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Direct recordings of grid-like neuronal activity in human spatial navigation.

Authors:  Joshua Jacobs; Christoph T Weidemann; Jonathan F Miller; Alec Solway; John F Burke; Xue-Xin Wei; Nanthia Suthana; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini D Sharan; Itzhak Fried; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  15 in total

1.  Transforming social perspectives with cognitive maps.

Authors:  Shahar Arzy; Raphael Kaplan
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.235

2.  Recruitment of Control and Representational Components of the Semantic System during Successful and Unsuccessful Access to Complex Factual Knowledge.

Authors:  Silvia Ubaldi; Giuseppe Rabini; Scott L Fairhall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Value signals guide abstraction during learning.

Authors:  Aurelio Cortese; Asuka Yamamoto; Maryam Hashemzadeh; Pradyumna Sepulveda; Mitsuo Kawato; Benedetto De Martino
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Structuring Knowledge with Cognitive Maps and Cognitive Graphs.

Authors:  Michael Peer; Iva K Brunec; Nora S Newcombe; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 5.  The self in context: brain systems linking mental and physical health.

Authors:  Leonie Koban; Peter J Gianaros; Hedy Kober; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 38.755

6.  Egocentric Navigation Abilities Predict Episodic Memory Performance.

Authors:  Giorgia Committeri; Agustina Fragueiro; Maria Maddalena Campanile; Marco Lagatta; Ford Burles; Giuseppe Iaria; Carlo Sestieri; Annalisa Tosoni
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Overcoming Pavlovian bias in semantic space.

Authors:  Sam Ereira; Marine Pujol; Marc Guitart-Masip; Raymond J Dolan; Zeb Kurth-Nelson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Map-Like Representations of an Abstract Conceptual Space in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Levan Bokeria; Richard N Henson; Robert M Mok
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.473

9.  Space oddity: musical syntax is mapped onto visual space.

Authors:  Neta B Maimon; Dominique Lamy; Zohar Eitan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  An immersive first-person navigation task for abstract knowledge acquisition.

Authors:  Doerte Kuhrt; Natalie R St John; Jacob L S Bellmund; Raphael Kaplan; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.