| Literature DB >> 32059421 |
Patrizia D'Aquila1, Francesco De Rango1, Francesco Guarasci2, Maurizio Mandalà1, Andrea Corsonello2, Dina Bellizzi1, Giuseppe Passarino1.
Abstract
An adequate mitochondrial quality control system ensures the maintenance of a healthy mitochondrial pool so as to slow down the progressive accumulation of damage affecting mitochondrial function during aging and diseases. The amount and quality of nutrients availability were demonstrated to induce a process of bioenergetics adaptation by influencing the above system via epigenetic modifications. Here, we analyzed DNA samples from differently-aged rats fed a standard or low-calorie diet to evaluate tissue-specific changes in DNA methylation of CpG sites falling within Polg, Polg2, Tfam, Fis1, and Opa1 genes. We found significant changes according to age and tissue type and the administration of the low-calorie diet is responsible for a prevalent increase in DNA methylation levels. Particularly, this increase was more appreciable when this diet was administered during adulthood and at old age. Regression analysis demonstrated that DNA methylation patterns of the analyzed genes were negatively correlated with their expression levels. Data we obtained provide the first evidence about changes in DNA methylation patterns of genes involved in the mitochondrial biogenesis in response to specific diets and demonstrated that epigenetic modifications are involved in the modulation of mitochondrial dynamics driven by age and nutrition.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; aging; mitochondrial biogenesis; mitochondrial dynamics; mitochondrial fission; mitochondrial fusion; nutrition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32059421 PMCID: PMC7071227 DOI: 10.3390/nu12020460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Age-related DNA methylation levels in blood, heart, kidney and liver of differently-aged rats. These levels are reported as arithmetic mean of the CpG sites located within Polg2, Tfam, Fis1 and Opa1 (A). Polg DNA methylation levels are reported in (B) because of their different numerical scale.
Figure 2Age-related DNA methylation levels in blood, heart, kidney and liver of differently-aged rats fed low-calorie diet. These levels are reported as arithmetic mean of the CpG sites located within Polg2, Tfam, Fis1 and Opa1 (A). Polg DNA methylation levels are reported in (B) because of their different numerical scale.
Figure 3Diet-induced methylation changes in Polg, Polg2, Tfam, Fis1 and Opa1 genes in blood, heart, kidney and liver in differently-aged rats. * p-value < 0.05 and changes >10%.
Pearson Correlation (R) between the Level of DNA Methylation, Polg, Polg2, Tfam, Fis1 and Opa1 Expression and mtDNA Copy Number. CI: Confidence Interval.
| Standard Diet | Low-Calorie Diet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks | Pearson′s R Correlation |
| 95% CI | Pearson′s R |
| 95% CI | |
|
| Polg methylation-Polg expression | −0.799 | 0.002 | −0.941, −0.415 | −0.877 | <0.001 | −0.965, −0.611 |
| Polg methylation-mtDNA copy number | −0.549 | 0.065 | −0.854, 0.036 | −0.835 | <0.001 | −0.953, −0.502 | |
| Polg2 methylation-Polg2 expression | −0.258 | 0.418 | −0.725, 0.371 | −0.672 | 0.017 | −0.899, −0.160 | |
| Polg2 methylation−mtDNA copy number | −0.090 | 0.782 | −0.631, 0.511 | −0.794 | 0.002 | −0.940, −0.405 | |
| Tfam methylation-Tfam expression | 0.708 | 0.010 | 0.225, 0.911 | −0.748 | 0.005 | −0.925, −0.306 | |
| Tfam methylation-mtDNA copy number | −0.473 | 0.121 | −0.823, 0.139 | 0.140 | 0.664 | −0.472, 0.661 | |
| Fis1 methylation-Fis1 expression | −0.179 | 0.578 | −0.683, 0.440 | −0.170 | 0.598 | −0.678, 0.448 | |
| Fis1 methylation-mtDNA copy number | −0.600 | 0.059 | −0.873, −0.039 | 0.178 | 0.579 | −0.441, 0.682 | |
| Opa1 methylation-Opa1 expression | −0.448 | 0.144 | −0.813, 0.169 | −0.404 | 0.193 | −0.794, 0.221 | |
| Opa1 methylation-mtDNA copy number | 0.258 | 0.418 | −0.371, 0.725 | 0.388 | 0.212 | −0.239, 0.787 | |
|
| Polg methylation-Polg expression | −0.925 | <0.001 | −0.979, −0.748 | −0.857 | <0.001 | −0.959, −0.558 |
| Polg methylation-mtDNA copy number | 0.114 | 0.725 | −0.492, 0.645 | −0.171 | 0.595 | −0.678, 0.447 | |
| Polg2 methylation-Polg2 expression | −0.513 | 0.088 | −0.840, 0.086 | 0.057 | 0.859 | −0.534, 0.611 | |
| Polg2 methylation-mtDNA copy number | 0.774 | 0.003 | 0.360, 0.933 | 0.565 | 0.056 | −0.013, 0.860 | |
| Tfam methylation-Tfam expression | −0.746 | 0.005 | −0.924, −0.302 | −0.941 | <0.001 | −0.984, −0.798 | |
| Tfam methylation-mtDNA copy number | 0.565 | 0.055 | −0.012, 0.860 | −0.054 | 0.866 | −0.609, 0.536 | |
| Fis1 methylation-Fis1 expression | −0.294 | 0.354 | −0.743, 0.337 | −0.294 | 0.354 | −0.743, 0.337 | |
| Fis1 methylation-mtDNA copy number | 0.457 | 0.135 | −0.804, 0.194 | 0.522 | 0.082 | −0.074, 0.843 | |
| Opa1 methylation-Opa1 expression | −0.799 | 0.002 | −0.941, −0.416 | −0.358 | 0.253 | −0.773, 0.272 | |
| Opa1 methylation-mtDNA copy number | 0.009 | 0.977 | −0.568, 0.580 | 0.284 | 0.371 | −0.347, 0.738 | |