Spontaneously occurring canine mammary gland tumors share many features with human breast cancer, including biological behavior and histologic features. Compared to transgenic murine model, canine models have advantages including naturally occurring models of human diseases and cancer. In humans, breast cancer is divided into molecular subtypes based on ER, PR, and HER2 expression. In contrast with humans, few studies have evaluated these subtypes in canine mammary gland tumors, including expression of HER2. HER2 expression in canine mammary tissues has been further complicated by controversy regarding the antibody's specificity. This study aimed to investigate c-erbB2 mRNA expression in retrospective formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples, using RNA in situ hybridization with a novel quantitative assay and to compare this method with immunohistochemistry. Using 48 canine mammary tumor samples and 14 non-neoplastic canine mammary tissues, RNA in situ hybridization was performed with RNAscope® using a canine-specific target gene probe (ERBB2), and quantitative measurement was performed using the housekeeping gene (POLR2A) to calculate the target gene/housekeeping gene ratio. The ratio of ERBB2/POLR2A was quantified using open-source image analysis programs and compared with the immunohistochemistry results. A significant correlation was observed between the HER2 immunohistochemistry score and ERBB2/POLR2A RNA in situ hybridization (P < 0.001). When the HER2 immunohistochemistry score was 3+, significantly higher expression of HER2 mRNA was observed by RNA in situ hybridization. Interestingly, HER2 mRNA was also observed in non-neoplastic mammary tissues by RNA in situ hybridization. This assay potentially facilitates the reliable quantification of mRNA expression levels in retrospective formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of HER2 in canine mammary gland tumors and to implement clinical trials in dogs.
Spontaneously occurring canine mammary gland tumors share many features with humanbreast cancer, including biological behavior and histologic features. Compared to transgenic murine model, canine models have advantages including naturally occurring models of humandiseases and cancer. In humans, breast cancer is divided into molecular subtypes based on ER, PR, and HER2 expression. In contrast with humans, few studies have evaluated these subtypes in canine mammary gland tumors, including expression of HER2. HER2 expression in canine mammary tissues has been further complicated by controversy regarding the antibody's specificity. This study aimed to investigate c-erbB2 mRNA expression in retrospective formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples, using RNA in situ hybridization with a novel quantitative assay and to compare this method with immunohistochemistry. Using 48 canine mammary tumor samples and 14 non-neoplastic canine mammary tissues, RNA in situ hybridization was performed with RNAscope® using a canine-specific target gene probe (ERBB2), and quantitative measurement was performed using the housekeeping gene (POLR2A) to calculate the target gene/housekeeping gene ratio. The ratio of ERBB2/POLR2A was quantified using open-source image analysis programs and compared with the immunohistochemistry results. A significant correlation was observed between the HER2 immunohistochemistry score and ERBB2/POLR2A RNA in situ hybridization (P < 0.001). When the HER2 immunohistochemistry score was 3+, significantly higher expression of HER2 mRNA was observed by RNA in situ hybridization. Interestingly, HER2 mRNA was also observed in non-neoplastic mammary tissues by RNA in situ hybridization. This assay potentially facilitates the reliable quantification of mRNA expression levels in retrospective formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of HER2 in canine mammary gland tumors and to implement clinical trials in dogs.
Spontaneously occurring canine mammary gland tumors (CMTs) are the most common tumor type in intact female dogs [1, 2]. CMTs in dogs share many epidemiological, biological, and clinical features with humanbreast cancer including their biological behavior and histologic features [3]. The few actively used prognostic factors for CMTs include histopathological classification and histologic grading, which have now been modified to model the criteria for humanbreast cancer [4-6]. Unlike that in humans, in dogs, surgery is the main treatment option for CMTs, and other systemic treatment options are limited to the research stage because they have not been sufficiently studied [7, 8]. Therefore, further studies are required to provide a basis for treatments including chemotherapy for CMTs.In humans, breast cancer exhibits well-established intrinsic subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like), facilitating accurate diagnosis and effective treatment [9]. Among these, the HER2-enriched subtype, accounting for approximately 15–25% of breast cancer cases, benefits from HER2-targeted chemotherapy using trastuzumab in humans [10-12]. In humanbreast cancer, HER2 status was commonly determined using Immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization [13]. Few studies, however, have evaluated the molecular subtypes of CMTs by immunohistochemistry, including HER2 expression, and have revealed inconsistent results [14, 15]. Ahern et al. reported that HER2 mRNA levels were lower in benign CMTs than in malignant CMTs through hybridization of total polysomal RNA with the humanc-erbB-2 probe [16]. However, Peña et al. reported discordant results in subsequent IHC studies [17]. Additionally, studies of HER2 expression in CMTs using IHC with an FDA-approved anti-HER2 polyclonal antibody (A0485, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) revealed differences in the expression patterns and non-specific cytoplasmic staining patterns in accordance with the criteria for humanbreast cancer [18, 19].RNAscope is a recently developed method for RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH), using a novel probe design and unique amplification system to amplify target-specific signals without background interference [20]. This RNA-ISH technique can be used to rapidly detect RNA with high sensitivity in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues [20].In this study, we investigated HER2 mRNA levels by assessing c-erbB2 expression in CMTs using RNA-ISH with a new quantitative assay method in retrospective FFPE CMTs samples. We assessed HER2 protein levels in CMTs by immunohistochemistry using the FDA-approved anti-HER2 antibody and compared the results with those obtained using RNA-ISH.
Materials and methods
Ethical statement
The protocol for tissue sampling was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Konkuk University (KU16106, KU17162, and KU18168). Tissue samples were acquired as routine diagnostic procedures from privately owned pet dogs via private veterinary hospitals with informed consent from the owner.
Case selection and histopathological analysis
Forty-eight CMT samples and 14 non-neoplastic canine mammary tissue samples that were suspected tumors but diagnosed as mammary gland hyperplasia were selected from the archived FFPE database from 2017 to 2019 at the Department of Veterinary Pathology, Konkuk University. Simple random sampling was performed for CMT samples yielding HER2 IHC data (available from our previous data descriptor [21] and validation studies) with complete clinical data. During RNA-ISH, tissue samples not suitable for analysis were excluded (describe in detail below). To prevent unequal distribution of the HER2 IHC score in malignant CMTs, additional selections were performed until each HER2 IHC score (1+, 2+, and 3+) was obtained from at least 10 samples. Ultimately, 38 FFPE CMT specimens were included in our previous data descriptor article [21].Forty-three dogs were intact females and 19 dogs were spayed females. The breeds included Maltese (n = 20), Shih-Tzu (n = 10), Mixed (n = 9), Poodle (n = 8), Schnauzer (n = 5), Yorkshire Terrier (n = 3), Cocker Spaniel (n = 2), Pomeranian (n = 2), English sheepdog (n = 1), Miniature Pinscher (n = 1) and Pekingese (n = 1). The age range of the dogs was 2–16 years [mean ± standard deviation (SD): 11.15 ± 3.02]. The detailed regarding sample characteristics are listed in S1 Table.For histological examination, 4-μm-thick sections from FFPE tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and diagnosed by two researchers (B.J.S. and J.H.S.). The histological subtype of each sample was categorized based on the World Health Organization classification for CMTs [4]. The histological grade was assessed based on the criteria described by Peña et al. [6]. Lymphatic invasion, defined as infiltration of tumor cells in lymphatic vessels, was also evaluated.
Immunohistochemistry
To evaluate the expression of HER2 protein, 4-μm-thick sections from FFPE tissues were used. Because of intra-tumor heterogeneity, serial sections were used for IHC and ISH experiments. IHC was performed as previously described with the polyclonal anti-humanc-erbB-2 oncoprotein antibody (Dako) [22]. Control slides known to be positive for HER2 were used as positive controls. Isotype-matched immunoglobulins were used as negative controls. HER2 staining was scored on the basis of the guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (0: No staining is observed or incomplete membrane staining that is faintly perceptible within ≤10% of epithelial tumor cells; 1+: Incomplete membrane staining that is faintly perceptible and within >10% of epithelial tumor cells; 2+: Weak to moderate complete membrane staining within >10% of tumor cells or complete intense membrane staining within ≤10% of tumor cells; and 3+: Intense complete membrane staining within >10% of tumor cells) [23]. According to human criteria, the observation of cytoplasmic staining (described by Burrai et al [19]) is non-specific, and the evaluation by B.J.S. was focused on a complete membranous staining pattern between score 1+ and 2+ and staining intensity between score 2+ and 3+. For ambiguous samples, a consensus was reached by the two researchers (B.J.S. and J.H.S.).
RNA in situ hybridization
RNA-ISH was performed for FFPE tissues using the RNAscope duplex assay (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Hayward, CA, USA). Because the RNA quality of FFPE tissues retrieved from storage archives showed variation following the storage period and fixation process [24], we performed quantitative analysis through dual detection of target genes and housekeeping genes in one section and determined the target gene/housekeeping gene ratio. To detect the target mRNA (HER2) in individual epithelial cells, we used an ERBB2 target probe (Cat. No.432411, Advanced Cell Diagnostics). A POLR2A probe (Cat. No.479111-C2, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) was used as a housekeeping gene following the manufacturer’s recommendations for canine tissue. GenBank accession numbers and probe regions are as follows: ERBB2 (GenBank, NM_001003217.1; probe region, 1585–2823) and POLR2A (GenBank XM_852751.3; probe region, 1846–2924). The procedure was manually carried out in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 4-μm-thick sections (serial sections with IHC slides) were baked for 1 h at 60°C in an oven, deparaffinized in xylene twice for 5 min each, and dehydrated in 100% ethanol twice for 2 min each. After the sections were air-dried, they were treated with RNAscope hydrogen peroxide solution (Cat. No. 322330, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) for 10 min at room temperature and washed with distilled water. The sections were incubated in target retrieval reagent (Cat. No.322000, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) maintained at a boiling temperature (93–98°C) using a hot plate for 15 min, and then washed with distilled water. A hydrophobic barrier was drawn around the samples using an Immedge hydrophobic barrier pen (Cat. No. H-4000, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Each section was treated with Protease plus (Cat. No.322330, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) reagents for 30 min at 40°C in a HybEZ hybridization oven (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). The sections were then incubated for 2 h at 40°C in a HybEZ hybridization oven using probes mixed with an ERBB2 probe (C1-Blue) and POLR2A probe (C2-red) at a 50:1 ratio. The slides were repeatedly washed twice with wash buffer reagent (Cat. No.310091, Advanced Cell Diagnostics) after each amplification step using RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex Detection Reagent (Cat. No.322500, Advanced Cell Diagnostics). Chromogenic detection was carried out using fast red (C2), followed by DAB chromogenic (C1) detection for 10 min at room temperature. Counterstaining was performed using 50% Gill’s hematoxylin. The bacterial gene DapB probe was used as a negative control at the same mixing ratio (50:1) for the C1 and C2 probe.
Evaluation of RNA-ISH results
RNA-ISH images were acquired (by B.J.S.) from five representative regions corresponding to the IHC scores and the histological diagnosis at 400× magnification for each sample. Digital images were acquired using an Olympus BX51 microscope (Tokyo, Japan) and Image transfer software (Olympus). In the RNA-ISH results, blue dots (HER2 mRNA) and red dots (POLR2A mRNA) were measured to determine the average ratios (ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio) for five representative images per sample. We used two open-source image analysis programs (Fiji [25] and ICY [26]) to analyze the images obtained after RNA-ISH experiments. First, the images were converted using the “Dichromacy > Tritanope” filters in Fiji to select blue signals against hematoxylin counterstaining. After selecting regions of interest (ROI) containing only epithelial regions in the filtered image (400× magnification; by B.J.S.), using ICY program, blue dots (ERBB2 mRNA) were measured using dark spot detection mode in the spot detector of ICY. To measure the red dots, Tritanope-filtered images were converted to a CIELAB (RGB to CIELAB) and ‘a’ channel images were acquired as jpg files. Red dots (POLR2A mRNA) were quantified using bright spot detection mode in the spot detector of ICY. In some tissue sections, the red channel (housekeeping gene) was not successful owing to RNA degradation or observed with high background of fast red may be due to endogenous alkaline phosphatase. These samples were excluded from the analysis. The quantification procedures are illustrated in Figs 1 and 2. And quantification procedure also deposited at protocols.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.badcia2w).
Fig 1
Workflow of quantification procedures of RNA-ISH.
(A) Flow chart for quantitative analysis of RNA-ISH images. (B) Representative RNA-ISH raw images are converted using each filter, and quantitative analysis is automatically performed using the spot detection software.
Fig 2
Example of analyzing RNA-ISH images.
(A) Original image of RNA-ISH. Blue dots (HER2) and red dots (POLR2A) were observed. (B) Blue dots and red dots were observed in Tritanope filtered image. (C) Blue dots are recognized and enumerated by spot detector of open-source program. (D) Red dots are recognized and enumerated by spot detector of open-source program.
Workflow of quantification procedures of RNA-ISH.
(A) Flow chart for quantitative analysis of RNA-ISH images. (B) Representative RNA-ISH raw images are converted using each filter, and quantitative analysis is automatically performed using the spot detection software.
Example of analyzing RNA-ISH images.
(A) Original image of RNA-ISH. Blue dots (HER2) and red dots (POLR2A) were observed. (B) Blue dots and red dots were observed in Tritanope filtered image. (C) Blue dots are recognized and enumerated by spot detector of open-source program. (D) Red dots are recognized and enumerated by spot detector of open-source program.
Statistical analysis
The ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio and HER2 IHC score were compared by the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction. Comparisons between ISH ratio and three groups were also performed using Kruskal-Wallis test and comparisons between ISH ratio and two groups were performed using Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24.0 software for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values were considered as significant when P < 0.05.
Results
Histology
Histologically, samples were classified as malignant (n = 42), benign (n = 6) and hyperplasia (n = 14). The histological subtypes of CMTs were classified as simple adenoma (n = 4), complex adenoma (n = 2), simple carcinoma (n = 26), and complex carcinoma (n = 16). The histological grade of malignant CMTs included grade 1 (n = 23), grade 2 (n = 9), and grade 3 (n = 10). Six cases of malignant CMTs exhibited evidence of lymphatic invasion.
HER2 protein expression
Among the 62 CMT and non-neoplastic tissue samples, the HER2 scores were classified as 1+ (n = 20), 2+ (n = 24), and 3+ (n = 18). In malignant CMT samples, 15 cases of carcinoma (8 simple and 7 complex) were scored as 1+, 15 cases of carcinoma (10 simple and 5 complex) were scored as 2+, and 12 cases of carcinoma (8 simple and 4 complex) were scored as 3+, with intense and complete immunoreactivity observed in more than 10% of epithelial tumor cells. In benign CMT samples, 2 cases of adenoma (2 complex) were scored as 1+, 3 cases of adenoma (3 simple) were scored as 2+, and 1 case of adenoma (1 simple) was scored as 3+. In mammary gland hyperplasia samples, 3 cases of samples were scored as 1+, 6 cases of samples were scored as 2+, and 5 cases of samples were scored as 3+. The results of the HER2 IHC score according to histological subtype were summarized in Table 1. In line with other studies [18, 19, 27], we also observed the cytoplasmic staining patterns of HER2 in CMTs, and only membranous staining patterns were evaluated in this study. HER2 expression was also observed in adjacent normal or hyperplastic mammary glands in CMTs and non-neoplastic tissues.
Table 1
The HER2 IHC score according to histological subtype of samples.
HER2 mRNA expression in canine mammary gland tissue was investigated by the RNA-ISH method. Because retrospective FFPE tissue samples from archives contain different amounts of RNA, the ratio between ERBB2 and the reference gene (POLR2A) was determined. The range of the ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio was 1.521–4.952 [mean ± standard deviation (SD): 3.079 ± 0.743]. The association between the HER2 (RNA-ISH results and IHC results) and parameters including the histological diagnosis, histological subtype, malignancy, histological grade, and presence of lymphatic invasion are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. HER2 mRNA dots were primarily observed in epithelial regions of the tumor. Although POLR2A reference mRNA dots were observed in both the epithelial and stromal regions, only the epithelial regions were counted upon selecting the ROI. In samples with upregulated HER2 mRNA, the mRNA dots were observed as clusters and dense clusters of HER2 mRNA signals were counted less than actual mRNA expression in some 3+ score cases. (S1 Fig).
Table 2
Association between the ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio and parameter including malignancy, histological subtype, histological grade, presence of lymphatic invasion, and HER2 IHC score.
ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio (Mean ± SD)
P-value
Histological diagnosisa
Non-neoplastic lesion (n = 14)
3.33 ± 0.80
0.301
Benign (n = 6)
2.78 ± 0.21
Malignant (n = 42)
3.04 ± 0.76
Histological subtypeb
Simple type (n = 30)
3.02 ± 0.77
0.983
Complex type (n = 18)
2.98 ± 0.64
Histological gradea
Grade 1 (n = 23)
2.90 ± 0.59
0.174
Grade 2 (n = 9)
2.89 ± 0.89
Grade 3 (n = 10)
3.47 ± 0.90
Lymphatic invasionb
Absent (n = 36)
2.99 ± 0.72
0.428
Present (n = 6)
3.30 ± 0.97
HER2 IHC score in malignant CMTsa
1+ (n = 15)
2.43 ± 0.56
<0. 001
2+ (n = 15)
3.01 ± 0.40
3+ (n = 12)
3.82 ± 0.62
HER2 IHC score in canine mammary tissuesa
1+ (n = 20)
2.51 ± 0.52
<0. 001
2+ (n = 24)
3.00 ± 0.50
3+ (n = 18)
3.81 ± 0.62
HER2 membranous staining pattern in malignant CMTsb
Incomplete (1+) (n = 15)
2.43 ± 0.56
< 0.001
Complete (2+ and 3+) (n = 27)
3.37 ± 0.65
HER2 membranous staining pattern in canine mammary tissuesb
Incomplete (1+) (n = 20)
2.51 ± 0.52
< 0.001
Complete (2+ and 3+) (n = 42)
3.35 ± 0.68
IHC, Immunohistochemistry; CMTs, Canine mammary gland tumors; SD, Standard deviation
a Kruskal-Wallis test
b Mann-Whitney test
Table 3
Association between HER2 IHC score and parameter including histological diagnosis, histological grade, presence of lymphatic invasion.
HER2 1+ (IHC) (Incomplete membranous staining)
HER2 2+ and 3+ (IHC) (Complete membranous staining)
P-value
n/total (%)
n/total (%)
Histological Diagnosisa
Non-neoplastic (n = 14)
3/14 (21.4%)
11/14 (78.6%)
0.697
Benign CMTs (n = 6)
2/6 (33.3%)
4/6 (66.7%)
Malignant CMTs (n = 42)
15/42 (35.7%)
27/42 (64.3%)
Histological gradea
Grade 1 (n = 23)
8/23 (34.8%)
15/23 (65.2%)
0.317
Grade 2 (n = 9)
5/9 (55.6%)
4/9 (44.4%)
Grade 3 (n = 10)
2/10 (20.0%)
8/10 (80.0%)
Lymphatic invasiona
Absent (n = 36)
14/36 (38.9%)
22/36 (61.1%)
0.395
Present (n = 6)
1/6 (16.7%)
5/6 (83.3%)
IHC, Immunohistochemistry
a Fisher’s exact test
IHC, Immunohistochemistry; CMTs, Canine mammary gland tumors; SD, Standard deviationa Kruskal-Wallis testb Mann-Whitney testIHC, Immunohistochemistrya Fisher’s exact test
Comparison of HER2 expression by RNA-ISH and immunohistochemistry
To compare HER2 IHC scores with the RNA-ISH results, RNA-ISH images were acquired in representative regions corresponding to those used to determine IHC scores. Expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in the region showing a strong membrane staining pattern in IHC (Fig 3A–3D). Furthermore, the expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in non-neoplastic lesions (Fig 4A and 4B). In some cases, the expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in the area around the tumor where staining pattern was observed in the adjacent normal mammary gland by IHC (Fig 4C and 4D). A significant correlation between the HER2 IHC score and ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio was observed (P < 0.000) in canine mammary tissues (Fig 5A and 5B). In addition, significant differences were observed between the 1+ score vs. 3+ score (Bonferroni-corrected P value < 0.001) and 2+ score vs. 3+ score (Bonferroni-corrected P value = 0.002) (Fig 5A). When the HER2 IHC score was 3+, significantly higher expression of HER2 mRNA was observed by RNA-ISH. Significant differences were observed based on complete membranous staining pattern between 1+ score (incomplete membranous staining) and 2+, 3+ score (complete membranous staining) (P < 0.001) (Fig 5B). No significant differences were observed in the HER2 IHC score and RNA-ISH results for clinicopathological parameters.
Fig 3
HER2 expression in adjacent serial section of canine mammary gland tissues.
(A) Strong membranous staining pattern was observed in the right side of images by IHC 200×, bar = 50 μm. (B) Expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in corresponding regions of adjacent serial section to Fig 3A by RNA-ISH, 200×, bar = 50 μm. (C) Strong membranous staining pattern staining pattern was observed in the bottom-left side of images by IHC 200×, bar = 50 μm. (D) Expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in corresponding regions adjacent serial sections to Fig 3C by RNA-ISH, 200×, bar = 50 μm.
Fig 4
HER2 expression in adjacent serial section of non-neoplastic regions.
(A) Strong membrane staining pattern (3+) in right sides of mammary gland hyperplasia samples by IHC, 40×, bar = 200 μm. (B) Expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in the section of serial to Fig 4A by RNA-ISH, 40×, bar = 200 μm. (C) Moderate HER2 staining was observed in the adjacent normal mammary gland in CMT by IHC, 200×, bar = 50 μm. (D) Expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in the section of serial to Fig 4C by RNA-ISH, 200×, bar = 50 μm.
Fig 5
Comparison of the ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio according to HER2 IHC score in canine mammary tissues.
A significant correlation between the HER2 IHC score and ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio was observed (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
HER2 expression in adjacent serial section of canine mammary gland tissues.
(A) Strong membranous staining pattern was observed in the right side of images by IHC 200×, bar = 50 μm. (B) Expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in corresponding regions of adjacent serial section to Fig 3A by RNA-ISH, 200×, bar = 50 μm. (C) Strong membranous staining pattern staining pattern was observed in the bottom-left side of images by IHC 200×, bar = 50 μm. (D) Expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in corresponding regions adjacent serial sections to Fig 3C by RNA-ISH, 200×, bar = 50 μm.
HER2 expression in adjacent serial section of non-neoplastic regions.
(A) Strong membrane staining pattern (3+) in right sides of mammary gland hyperplasia samples by IHC, 40×, bar = 200 μm. (B) Expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in the section of serial to Fig 4A by RNA-ISH, 40×, bar = 200 μm. (C) Moderate HER2 staining was observed in the adjacent normal mammary gland in CMT by IHC, 200×, bar = 50 μm. (D) Expression of HER2 mRNA dots was observed in the section of serial to Fig 4C by RNA-ISH, 200×, bar = 50 μm.
Comparison of the ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio according to HER2 IHC score in canine mammary tissues.
A significant correlation between the HER2 IHC score and ERBB2/POLR2A ISH ratio was observed (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
Discussion
In humans, breast cancers with HER2 overexpression display aggressive behavior and are associated with reduced patient survival [28, 29]. Anti-HER2 therapies including trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the extracellular domain of HER2, has improved treatment outcomes [12, 30]. HER2 protein has gained increasing attention in veterinary oncology and was recently investigated in dogs. However, studies on HER2 expression in CMTs using human anti-HER2 antibody, have shown variable results [14, 15, 31]. The specificity of human anti-HER2 antibody (Dako A0485) for detecting HER2 in canine tissues remains controversial. One study showed no evidence of its specificity in canine tissues by western blotting and subsequent mass spectrometric analysis [19], while another recent study showed the cross-reactivity of the human anti-HER2 antibody in canine tissue by western blotting [27].Furthermore, the present results displayed cytoplasmic immunoreactivity in tumor cells and non-neoplastic cells, similar to the results of some previous studies [18, 19, 27]. As this cytoplasmic immunoreactivity is considered non-specific in accordance with human criteria, we limited our analysis to membranous immunoreactivity. Previous studies [19, 32] have shown that mRNA and IHC levels are not completely correlated in CMTs, probably owing to post-translational events [33].In our study, however, HER2 mRNA levels were high in IHC samples with strong complete membranous staining pattern (3+), and a significant correlation was observed between the IHC score and RNA-ISH results. Furthermore, similar expression pattern was observed in high power field images (Figs 3 and 4) in which left and right sides were expressed differently due to intra-tumor heterogeneity [34]. This discrepancy in our results relative to previous results may have occurred by using consecutive sections and restricting RNA-ISH analysis of gene expression to epithelial regions and matching the IHC scores to prevent intra-tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, this in situ detection technology (RNA-ISH) is superior to RT-PCR, which depends on an admixture of cells with a potentially low content of malignant epithelial cells. Our results are consistent with those of a previous study that analyzed HER2 mRNA expression in humanbreast cancer by RT-PCR and RNA-ISH in parallel [35]. Significant differences in the RNA-ISH results were also observed depending on complete membranous staining pattern. Although the specificity of the anti-HER2 antibody is controversial, the present results reduced the likelihood of nonspecific findings with antibodies during IHC by morphologically confirming mRNA expression directly in tissue and comparing it with IHC results. And thus, IHC method may be used as a complement to assess the HER2 status determined from membrane staining pattern (RNA-ISH method is more specific).To confirm the association between HER2 expression and its prognosis in CMTs, we assessed the available clinical parameters. However, no significant correlation was observed between the HER2 status (mRNA and protein levels) and clinical parameters (malignancy, histological subtype, histological grade, lymphatic invasion). This is consistent with the results of previous studies showing that HER2 is not associated with poor prognostic factors in CMTs [18, 36, 37]. Additionally, present study revealed that HER2 is also expressed in non-neoplastic mammary gland tissues. This is a distinct characteristic from that of humanbreast cancer, suggesting prospects for future study from the viewpoint of comparative medical research. Recently, lower prevalence of ERBB2 copy number variant was observed in HER2 protein overexpressing canineurothelial carcinoma [38]. In present study, we did not confirm the HER2 amplification status in canine mammary tissues, which is correlated with HER2 overexpression in humanbreast cancer, and only observed mRNA and protein levels; thus, further studies are needed to determine expression of HER2 mRNA is due to gene amplification or other mechanism.This study shows the use of quantitative RNA-ISH. RNA-ISH technology with RNAscope has already been used to for humanbreast cancer to determine HER2 mRNA levels in equivocal cases (IHC 2+ or a Fluorescence ISH ratio of 1.8 to 2.2) and has displayed better performance than that by qPCR [35]. In retrospective studies, RNA preservation may vary between FFPE samples from archives; hence, we used a dual detection RNA-ISH method to compare with housekeeping genes, unlike that in previous studies. This assay method has been primarily used in fluorescence ISH to confirm HER2 gene amplification by HER2 to chromosome 17 ratio in breast cancer [39]. In addition, manual enumeration of dots is difficult; hence, to enumerate the dots to determine the target gene/housekeeping gene ratio, we developed an automated measurement protocol using open-source programs. The method displayed adequate performance without human subjectivity in recognizing dots. Although dense clusters of dots tended to be enumerated at lower levels than the actual expression levels, our experimental groups yielded significant results. The present method of in situ analysis of RNA in tissues is potentially applicable in studies using retrospective FFPE samples. Furthermore, the RNA-ISH method may be used to supplement existing IHC methods if the antibody is not adequately sensitive or if no antibodies are available (newly discovered gene signatures studies).Compared to the use of transgenic murine models, the use of naturally occurring canine models of human diseases for translational research has benefits for dogs and for study cancer in humans [40]. Using canine models to evaluate human diseases is advantageous because they exhibit naturally occurring cancer, clinical similarities, high incidences, and shorter lifespans than humans [41, 42]. Recently, HER2-targeted cancer immunotherapy using recombinant Listeria monocytogenes, which expresses a chimeric humanHER2/neu construct, was shown to prolong the overall survival and reduce metastasis rates in canine models of pediatric osteosarcomas [43]. Additionally, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (lapatinib) of HER2, which may cross-react between species, exerted anti-tumor effects in canine transitional cell carcinoma cell lines [44]. Such comparative studies using canine models may not only facilitate individual therapeutic methods for dogs but are also applicable in understanding the pathogenesis of humancancers.
Conclusions
In this study, we assessed HER2 mRNA levels in CMTs using RNA-ISH and observed a correlation with the HER2 immunohistochemistry score. We developed an automated, quantitative dual staining RNA-ISH method to evaluate HER2 expression relative to that of a housekeeping gene. This assay potentially allows for reliable quantification of mRNA expression levels in retrospective FFPE samples. Because no correlation was identified in this study between HER2 expression and clinical parameters, further studies are needed to clarify if there is a role of HER2 in the pathogenesis of CMTs.
Clinical information of the samples.
The avaialbe clinical information of 62 samples are listed.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
Example image of dense clusters of HER2 mRNA dots tended to be enumerated at lower levels than the actual expression levels.
Authors: M F Press; L Bernstein; P A Thomas; L F Meisner; J Y Zhou; Y Ma; G Hung; R A Robinson; C Harris; A El-Naggar; D J Slamon; R N Phillips; J S Ross; S R Wolman; K J Flom Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G P Burrai; A Tanca; M R De Miglio; M Abbondio; S Pisanu; M Polinas; S Pirino; S I Mohammed; S Uzzau; M F Addis; E Antuofermo Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2015-06-19
Authors: Edward H Romond; Edith A Perez; John Bryant; Vera J Suman; Charles E Geyer; Nancy E Davidson; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Silvana Martino; Soonmyung Paik; Peter A Kaufman; Sandra M Swain; Thomas M Pisansky; Louis Fehrenbacher; Leila A Kutteh; Victor G Vogel; Daniel W Visscher; Greg Yothers; Robert B Jenkins; Ann M Brown; Shaker R Dakhil; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Wilma L Lingle; Pamela M Klein; James N Ingle; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patrícia de Faria Lainetti; Andressa Brandi; Antonio Fernando Leis Filho; Maria Carolina Mangini Prado; Priscila Emiko Kobayashi; Renée Laufer-Amorim; Carlos Eduardo Fonseca-Alves Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2020-10-27