Yu-Hsuan Shih1, Molly Scannell Bryan2, Maria Argos3. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. 2. Institute for Minority Health Research, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. 3. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. Electronic address: argos@uic.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic arsenic exposure has been associated with pregnancy complications and reduced fetal growth in populations where total arsenic exposure exceeds 50 μg/L. However, the potential effect on pregnancy outcomes remains unclear at lower levels of arsenic exposure, such as those most commonly observed in the United States. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the associations between arsenic exposure during pregnancy with fetal growth and risk of pregnancy complications using data from mother-infant pairs participating in the National Children's Study. METHODS: Prenatal arsenic exposure was measured using maternal urine collected during the third trimester. Information about pregnancy complications was abstracted from medical records. Fetal growth, including gestational age, birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and ponderal index, was ascertained through physical measurement at birth and extracted from medical records. RESULTS: Medians [interquartile range (IQR)] of maternal urinary total arsenic and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) were 7.77 μg/L (7.98) and 3.44 μg/L (3.13), respectively. Each increase in IQR of prenatal total arsenic level was associated with greater birth length (+0.28 cm; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.42), greater head circumference (+0.12 cm; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.21), and lower ponderal index (-0.37 kg/m3; 95% CI: -0.58, -0.17). Similar results were obtained for levels of prenatal DMA. Tests for multiplicative interaction indicate that prenatal urinary DMA was negatively associated with gestational age among female infants (-0.44 week decrease in gestational age estimated for each IQR increase in DMA; 95% CI: -0.84, -0.05), while no association was observed among male infants (pinteraction = 0.02). No significant associations were detected between arsenic and birth weight or pregnancy complications. CONCLUSIONS: Higher prenatal arsenic exposure was associated with longer birth length, greater head circumference, and lower ponderal index. Associations between arsenic and gestational age may be modified by infant sex.
BACKGROUND: Chronic arsenic exposure has been associated with pregnancy complications and reduced fetal growth in populations where total arsenic exposure exceeds 50 μg/L. However, the potential effect on pregnancy outcomes remains unclear at lower levels of arsenic exposure, such as those most commonly observed in the United States. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the associations between arsenic exposure during pregnancy with fetal growth and risk of pregnancy complications using data from mother-infant pairs participating in the National Children's Study. METHODS: Prenatal arsenic exposure was measured using maternal urine collected during the third trimester. Information about pregnancy complications was abstracted from medical records. Fetal growth, including gestational age, birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and ponderal index, was ascertained through physical measurement at birth and extracted from medical records. RESULTS: Medians [interquartile range (IQR)] of maternal urinary total arsenic and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) were 7.77 μg/L (7.98) and 3.44 μg/L (3.13), respectively. Each increase in IQR of prenatal total arsenic level was associated with greater birth length (+0.28 cm; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.42), greater head circumference (+0.12 cm; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.21), and lower ponderal index (-0.37 kg/m3; 95% CI: -0.58, -0.17). Similar results were obtained for levels of prenatal DMA. Tests for multiplicative interaction indicate that prenatal urinary DMA was negatively associated with gestational age among female infants (-0.44 week decrease in gestational age estimated for each IQR increase in DMA; 95% CI: -0.84, -0.05), while no association was observed among male infants (pinteraction = 0.02). No significant associations were detected between arsenic and birth weight or pregnancy complications. CONCLUSIONS: Higher prenatal arsenic exposure was associated with longer birth length, greater head circumference, and lower ponderal index. Associations between arsenic and gestational age may be modified by infant sex.
Authors: G D Shapiro; L Dodds; T E Arbuckle; J Ashley-Martin; W Fraser; M Fisher; S Taback; E Keely; M F Bouchard; P Monnier; R Dallaire; As Morisset; A S Ettinger Journal: Environ Int Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Anisur Rahman; Marie Vahter; Allan H Smith; Barbro Nermell; Mohammed Yunus; Shams El Arifeen; Lars-Ake Persson; Eva-Charlotte Ekström Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-11-26 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Emily Oken; Ken P Kleinman; Wendy E Berland; Steven R Simon; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Matthew W Gillman Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Reginald Quansah; Frederick Ato Armah; David Kofi Essumang; Isaac Luginaah; Edith Clarke; Kissinger Marfoh; Samuel Jerry Cobbina; Edward Nketiah-Amponsah; Proscovia Bazanya Namujju; Samuel Obiri; Mawuli Dzodzomenyo Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Ada Sandoval-Carrillo; Edna M Méndez-Hernández; Elizabeth I Antuna-Salcido; Sergio M Salas-Pacheco; Fernando Vázquez-Alaniz; Alfredo Téllez-Valencia; Marisela Aguilar-Durán; Marcelo Barraza-Salas; Francisco X Castellanos-Juárez; Osmel La Llave-León; José M Salas-Pacheco Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Shohreh F Farzan; Anala Gossai; Yu Chen; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Emily Baker; Margaret Karagas Journal: Environ Health Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Elizabeth A Maull; Habibul Ahsan; Joshua Edwards; Matthew P Longnecker; Ana Navas-Acien; Jingbo Pi; Ellen K Silbergeld; Miroslav Styblo; Chin-Hsiao Tseng; Kristina A Thayer; Dana Loomis Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: S A Ahmad; M H Sayed; S Barua; M H Khan; M H Faruquee; A Jalil; S A Hadi; H K Talukder Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Catherine M Bulka; Molly Scannell Bryan; Melissa A Lombard; Scott M Bartell; Daniel K Jones; Paul M Bradley; Veronica M Vieira; Debra T Silverman; Michael Focazio; Patricia L Toccalino; Johnni Daniel; Lorraine C Backer; Joseph D Ayotte; Matthew O Gribble; Maria Argos Journal: Environ Int Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 13.352
Authors: Peter K Gilbertson; Susan Forrester; Linda Andrews; Kathleen McCann; Lydia Rogers; Christina Park; Jack Moye Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-03-05
Authors: Jeliyah Clark; Paige Bommarito; Miroslav Stýblo; Marisela Rubio-Andrade; Gonzalo G García-Vargas; Mary V Gamble; Rebecca C Fry Journal: Environ Health Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 7.123
Authors: Benjamin D McMichael; M Chiara Perego; Caitlin L Darling; Rebekah L Perry; Sarah C Coleman; Lisa J Bain Journal: J Appl Toxicol Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.628