Literature DB >> 32056858

Toxicity of oil spill response agents and crude oils to five aquatic test species.

Mace G Barron1, Adriana C Bejarano2, Robyn N Conmy3, Devi Sundaravadivelu4, Peter Meyer5.   

Abstract

The majority of aquatic toxicity data for petroleum products has been limited to a few intensively studied crude oils and Corexit chemical dispersants, and acute toxicity testing in two standard estuarine test species: mysids (Americamysis bahia) and inland silversides (Menidia beryllina). This study compared the toxicity of two chemical dispersants commonly stock piled for spill response (Corexit EC9500A®, Finasol®OSR 52), three less studied agents (Accell Clean®DWD dispersant; CytoSol® surface washing agent; Gelco200® solidifier), and three crude oils differing in hydrocarbon composition (Dorado, Endicott, Alaska North Slope). Consistent with listings on the U.S. National Contingency Plan Product Schedule, general rank order toxicity was greatest for dispersants and lowest for the solidifier. The results indicate that freshwater species can have similar sensitivity as the conventionally tested mysids and silversides, and that the sea urchin (Arbacia punctulata) appears to be a reasonable addition to increase taxa diversity in standardized oil agent testing.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dispersant; Oil; Spill response; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32056858      PMCID: PMC7425839          DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  14 in total

1.  Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice.

Authors:  J R Wheeler; E P M Grist; K M Y Leung; D Morritt; M Crane
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Critical evaluation of CROSERF test methods for oil dispersant toxicity testing under subarctic conditions.

Authors:  Mace G Barron; Lisa Ka'aihue
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Acute toxicity of eight oil spill response chemicals to temperate, boreal, and Arctic species.

Authors:  Bjørn Henrik Hansen; Dag Altin; Kristin Bonaunet; Ida Beathe Overjordet
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2014

Review 4.  Critical review and analysis of aquatic toxicity data on oil spill dispersants.

Authors:  Adriana C Bejarano
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  An Evaluation of Select Test Variables Potentially Affecting Acute Oil Toxicity.

Authors:  Brandi S Echols; A Smith; P Gardinali; G Rand
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Comparative toxicity of eight oil dispersants, Louisiana sweet crude oil (LSC), and chemically dispersed LSC to two aquatic test species.

Authors:  Michael J Hemmer; Mace G Barron; Richard M Greene
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  MOAtox: A comprehensive mode of action and acute aquatic toxicity database for predictive model development.

Authors:  M G Barron; C R Lilavois; T M Martin
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  A Comparative Assessment of the Aquatic Toxicity of Corexit 9500 to Marine Organisms.

Authors:  B S Echols; C J Langdon; W A Stubblefield; G M Rand; P R Gardinali
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Toxicity of Cold Lake Blend and Western Canadian Select dilbits to standard aquatic test species.

Authors:  Mace G Barron; Robyn N Conmy; Edith L Holder; Peter Meyer; Gregory J Wilson; Vanessa E Principe; Morgan M Willming
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Dose-Response Analysis Using R.

Authors:  Christian Ritz; Florent Baty; Jens C Streibig; Daniel Gerhard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.