| Literature DB >> 32056500 |
Niels van den Berg1,2, Ingrid K van Dijk1,3, Rick J Mourits1,4, P Eline Slagboom2, Angelique A P O Janssens1,5, Kees Mandemakers6,7.
Abstract
It remains unknown how different types of sources affect the reconstruction of life courses and families in large-scale databases increasingly common in demographic research. Here, we compare family and life-course reconstructions for 495 individuals simultaneously present in two well-known Dutch data sets: LINKS, based on the Zeeland province's full-population vital event registration data (passive registration), and the Historical Sample of the Netherlands (HSN), based on a national sample of birth certificates, with follow-up of individuals in population registers (active registration). We compare indicators of fertility, marriage, mortality, and occupational status, and conclude that reconstructions in the HSN and LINKS reflect each other well: LINKS provides more complete information on siblings and parents, whereas the HSN provides more complete life-course information. We conclude that life-course and family reconstructions based on linked passive registration of individuals constitute a reliable alternative to reconstructions based on active registration, if case selection is carefully considered.Keywords: civil registers; databases; demographic methods; family history; family reconstitutions; family reconstruction; historical demography; life course; microdata; population registers
Year: 2020 PMID: 32056500 DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2020.1718186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Popul Stud (Camb) ISSN: 0032-4728