| Literature DB >> 32056048 |
Xinyang Li1,2,3, Meiniang Wang2,3, Xinhua Zhang2,3, Chuxin Liu2,3, Haitao Xiang2,3, Mi Huang3,4, Yingying Ma3,4, Xiaoyan Gao3,4, Lin Jiang2,3, Xiaopan Liu1,2,3, Bo Li2,3, Yong Hou2,3, Xiuqing Zhang2,3, Shuang Yang5,6, Naibo Yang7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The advent of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)-inhibiting drugs have provided an effective, but extremely expensive treatment for the management of low density lipoprotein (LDL). Our aim was to explore a cost-effective application of camelid anti-PCSK9 single domain antibodies (sdAbs), which are high variable regions of the camelid heavy chain antibodies (VHHs), as a human PCSK9 (hPCSK9) inhibitor. One female llama was immunized with hPCSK9. Screening of high affinity anti-PCSK9 VHHs was carried out based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technology. We reported a lysate kinetic analysis method improving the screening efficiency. To increase the serum half-life and targeting properties, the constant region fragment of the human immunoglobulin gamma sub-type 4 (IgG4 Fc) was incorporated to form a novel llama-human chimeric molecule (VHH-hFc).Entities:
Keywords: Antibody; LDL-c; PCSK9; Pichia pastoris; VHH-Fc; sdAb
Year: 2020 PMID: 32056048 PMCID: PMC7018876 DOI: 10.1186/s40169-020-0265-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Med ISSN: 2001-1326
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the whole experimental workflow. The whole experimental workflow consists of the PCSK9 immunization, blood sampling, VHH library construction, E. coli transformation, phage-display panning, Sanger sequencing, VHHs protein expression, bivalent VHH design, affinity test, LDL-uptake, and pharmacodynamics assay
Fig. 2The scatter plot of the lysate kinetics screening. The scatter plot represents the results of the lysate kinetics screening. The horizontal axis represents the relative response unit of the stability. The vertical axis represents the relative response unit of the binding. Each dot represents one sample with the tag name (e.g. B11, H12, P-1 and so on). ‘TES’ represents the 55% TES buffer (0.2 M Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 M sucrose), which was system buffer and taken as the blank sample
Fig. 3The affinity test for the four VHHs/hPCSK9 interaction. A 6 or 7-points, double fold dilution of these VHH-based proteins were injected to bind with the hPCSK9. Each colored line represents one concentration of the VHH proteins. The black lines represent the automatic fitting curves by the built-in evaluation software. The horizontal axis represents the timeline, and the vertical axis represents the relative response unit of the VHH/hPCSK9 interaction. The VHH protein injection time point was automatically set as 0 s by the built-in evaluation software
The affinities of the antibodies with the hPCSK9
| Ab ID | kon (1/Ms) | koff (1/s) | Rmax (RU) | Chi2 (RU2) | KD (nM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VHH-B11 | 2.706 × 105 | 2.351 × 10−3 | 42.4 | 1.17 | 8.688 |
| VHH-H12 | 0.7441 × 104 | 5.236 × 10−3 | 34.94 | 3.53 | 703.7 |
| VHH-A6 | 1.543 × 104 | 4.468 × 10−4 | 15.40 | 0.334 | 28.97 |
| VHH-G8 | 1.625 × 105 | 11.44 × 10−3 | 33.64 | 0.813 | 73.05 |
| B11-Fc (25 °C) | 1.872 × 106 | 1.288 × 10−3 | 24.71 | 0.693 | 0.6879 |
| B11-Fc (1st week) | 1.393 × 105 | 6.181 × 10−5 | 464.6 | 30.1 | 0.4438 |
| B11-Fc (4th week) | 1.362 × 105 | 9.116 × 10−5 | 457.4 | 25.3 | 0.6693 |
| B11-Fc (7th week) | 1.352 × 105 | 6.983 × 10−5 | 234.8 | 6.82 | 0.5166 |
| B11-Fc (10th week) | 1.304 × 105 | 6.523 × 10−5 | 161.9 | 3.22 | 0.5002 |
| B11-Fc (13th week) | 1.221 × 105 | 8.148 × 10−5 | 119.5 | 1.82 | 0.6673 |
| B11-Fc (40 °C) | 4.260 × 105 | 5.233 × 10−5 | 325.1 | 24.3 | 0.1228 |
Ab ID represents the name of each antibody. kon (1/Ms) and koff (1/s) values, respectively represent the binding and dissociation levels of the VHH interacted with the hPCSK9. KD (M) was the measured affinity value acquired by the koff value divided by the kon value. Rmax (RU) represents the maximum binding response unit. Chi2 (RU2) represents the curve-fitting accuracy, generally ≤ 1/10 Rmax (RU). 25 °C/40 °C represents the reaction temperatures of the affinity determination assay by SPR. B11-Fc (xx week) represents their affinities which were detected at the preservation end of the 1st, 4th, 7th, 10th, and 13th weeks
Fig. 4The epitope binning assay by SPR and ELISA. a The epitope binning assay of the VHH-B11 was performed against the approved evolocumab by SPR (Protein A chip). The horizontal axis represents the timeline. The vertical axis represents the relative response unit. The curve consists of four processes: baseline; capture evolocumab; injecting PCSK9 (binding and dissociation); injecting VHH-B11 (binding and dissociation). b The dual antibody sandwich ELISA method between VHH-B11 and the approved evolocumab (coated on the plate, as shown in the schematic diagram). The horizontal axis represents different dilution concentrations of the VHH-B11. The vertical axis represents the OD450 value
Fig. 5The SDS-PAGE gel and the affinity tests. a–c the SDS-PAGE gel of the VHH-B11, and the bivalency B11-Fc. M1, M2 and M3: the protein markers (Fermentas, USA). Lane1: VHH-B11, 17 kDa Lane2: B11-Fc, 76 kDa non-reduced gel; Lane3: B11-Fc, 40 kDa reduced gel. d The affinity test of the bivalency B11-Fc. Each colored line represents one antibody concentration. The black lines represent the automatic fitting curves by the built-in evaluation software. The binding and dissociation time was set at 180 s and 240 s, respectively, and the protein injection time point was automatically set as 0 s by the built-in evaluation software
Fig. 6The LDL-uptake test in HepG2 (a) and Huh7 (b) cell models. The horizontal axis represents four different groups. The vertical axis represents the relative fluorescence unit (RFU) of the intracellular LDL, which reflects the levels of the LDL-c uptake and functional LDLR at the cell surface. The left two columns were respectively taken as the blank (full white) and negative (full black) control groups. The right six columns represent the other two groups of the monovalent VHH-B11, and the bivalency B11-Fc respectively in three doses (0.375, 0.750 and 1.500 μM). LDL-c uptake percent was given on the right of the histogram (←). ‘(+)’ and ‘(−)’refers to the addition and absence of hPCSK9 or VHH derivative antibodies, respectively. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant, compared with the negative control group (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001)
Fig. 7The pharmacodynamics assay in the hPCSK9 transgenic rat model. The horizontal axis represents the timeline (days post the first treatment). The vertical axis represents the CHOL (A), LDL-c (B) levels (mmol/L) and their percent change (%) was given on the right (←). ‘SD’ was the normal Sprague Dawley rat. ‘Tg+’ represents the hPCSK9 transgenic SD rat; ‘high fat’ refers to the feeding of the high fat diet to the rat. ‘Evolo’ represents the rat treated with the evolocumab. ‘PBS’ represents the rat injected with the PBS buffer. ‘↓’ represents the two treatments on day 0 and day 7. ‘×’ represents the sacrifice of the animals on day 20. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant, compared with the PBS group (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ns: not significant)