OBJECTIVE: The advent of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking drugs has provided rheumatologists with an effective, but highly expensive, treatment for the management of established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to explore preclinically the application of camelid anti-TNF VHH proteins, which are single-domain antigen binding (VHH) proteins homologous to human immunoglobulin V(H) domains, as TNF antagonists in a mouse model of RA. METHODS: Llamas were immunized with human and mouse TNF, and antagonistic anti-TNF VHH proteins were isolated and cloned for bacterial production. The resulting anti-TNF VHH proteins were recombinantly linked to yield bivalent mouse and human TNF-specific molecules. To increase the serum half-life and targeting properties, an anti-serum albumin anti-TNF VHH domain was incorporated into the bivalent molecules. The TNF-neutralizing potential was analyzed in vitro. Mouse TNF-specific molecules were tested in a therapeutic protocol in murine collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Disease progression was evaluated by clinical scoring and histologic evaluation. Targeting properties were evaluated by 99mTc labeling and gamma camera imaging. RESULTS: The bivalent molecules were up to 500 times more potent than the monovalent molecules. The antagonistic potency of the anti-human TNF VHH proteins exceeded even that of the anti-TNF antibodies infliximab and adalimumab that are used clinically in RA. Incorporation of binding affinity for albumin into the anti-TNF VHH protein significantly prolonged its serum half-life and promoted its targeting to inflamed joints in the murine CIA model of RA. This might explain the excellent therapeutic efficacy observed in vivo. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that because of the flexibility of their format, camelid anti-TNF VHH proteins can be converted into potent therapeutic agents that can be produced and purified cost-effectively.
OBJECTIVE: The advent of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking drugs has provided rheumatologists with an effective, but highly expensive, treatment for the management of established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to explore preclinically the application of camelid anti-TNF VHH proteins, which are single-domain antigen binding (VHH) proteins homologous to human immunoglobulin V(H) domains, as TNF antagonists in a mouse model of RA. METHODS:Llamas were immunized with human and mouseTNF, and antagonistic anti-TNF VHH proteins were isolated and cloned for bacterial production. The resulting anti-TNF VHH proteins were recombinantly linked to yield bivalent mouse and humanTNF-specific molecules. To increase the serum half-life and targeting properties, an anti-serum albumin anti-TNF VHH domain was incorporated into the bivalent molecules. The TNF-neutralizing potential was analyzed in vitro. MouseTNF-specific molecules were tested in a therapeutic protocol in murine collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Disease progression was evaluated by clinical scoring and histologic evaluation. Targeting properties were evaluated by 99mTc labeling and gamma camera imaging. RESULTS: The bivalent molecules were up to 500 times more potent than the monovalent molecules. The antagonistic potency of the anti-humanTNF VHH proteins exceeded even that of the anti-TNF antibodies infliximab and adalimumab that are used clinically in RA. Incorporation of binding affinity for albumin into the anti-TNF VHH protein significantly prolonged its serum half-life and promoted its targeting to inflamed joints in the murine CIA model of RA. This might explain the excellent therapeutic efficacy observed in vivo. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that because of the flexibility of their format, camelid anti-TNF VHH proteins can be converted into potent therapeutic agents that can be produced and purified cost-effectively.
Authors: Sven Jähnichen; Christophe Blanchetot; David Maussang; Maria Gonzalez-Pajuelo; Ken Y Chow; Leontien Bosch; Sindi De Vrieze; Benedikte Serruys; Hans Ulrichts; Wesly Vandevelde; Michael Saunders; Hans J De Haard; Dominique Schols; Rob Leurs; Peter Vanlandschoot; Theo Verrips; Martine J Smit Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G Caljon; V Caveliers; T Lahoutte; B Stijlemans; G H Ghassabeh; J Van Den Abbeele; I Smolders; P De Baetselier; Y Michotte; S Muyldermans; S Magez; R Clinckers Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Amanda Sparkes; Patrick De Baetselier; Lea Brys; Inês Cabrito; Yann G-J Sterckx; Steve Schoonooghe; Serge Muyldermans; Geert Raes; Richard Bucala; Peter Vanlandschoot; Jo A Van Ginderachter; Benoît Stijlemans Journal: FASEB J Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kim S Rutgers; Alexandra van Remoortere; Mark A van Buchem; C Theo Verrips; Steven M Greenberg; Brian J Bacskai; Matthew P Frosch; Sjoerd G van Duinen; Marion L Maat-Schieman; Silvère M van der Maarel Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Rafael Scaf de Molon; Chingyun Hsu; Olga Bezouglaia; Sarah M Dry; Flavia Q Pirih; Akrivoula Soundia; Fernando Queiroz Cunha; Joni Augusto Cirelli; Tara L Aghaloo; Sotirios Tetradis Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Janusz Wesolowski; Vanina Alzogaray; Jan Reyelt; Mandy Unger; Karla Juarez; Mariela Urrutia; Ana Cauerhff; Welbeck Danquah; Björn Rissiek; Felix Scheuplein; Nicole Schwarz; Sahil Adriouch; Olivier Boyer; Michel Seman; Alexei Licea; David V Serreze; Fernando A Goldbaum; Friedrich Haag; Friedrich Koch-Nolte Journal: Med Microbiol Immunol Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 3.402