Literature DB >> 12107309

Implant-related fractures of the femur following hip fracture surgery.

C M Robinson1, C I Adams, M Craig, W Doward, M C C Clarke, J Auld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most hip fractures are treated surgically, with use of either internal fixation or prosthetic replacement of the femoral head. The presence of these implants increases the risk of a later femoral fracture in susceptible osteoporotic patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of and risk factors for implant-related fractures of the femur after previous hip fracture surgery.
METHODS: Over a ten-year period from January 1988 to December 1997, 6230 patients (median age, eighty-two years; male:female ratio, 1247:4983) who sustained a total of 6696 hip fractures were admitted to the Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit. Demographic information on the patients and details of the original treatment of the hip fracture were prospectively coded and entered into a trauma database. All subsequent readmissions due to a femoral fracture related to the implant were prospectively audited and extracted for the purposes of this study.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients sustained an ipsilateral fracture of the femur at a median of twenty-four weeks following the original hip fracture surgery. Survivorship analysis of the hip fracture population revealed an overall rate of subsequent femoral fracture of 2.9% at five years, which increased to 5.1% at ten years. The median age and gender distribution of the patients who sustained a subsequent femoral fracture were similar to those of the hip fracture population as a whole. Two-thirds of the fractures propagated from the tip of the implant. Analysis of the subsequent fractures according to the type of implant used to treat the original fracture revealed considerable differences in incidence. The incidence was relatively high in the patients initially treated with a Gamma nail (18.74 fractures per 1000 person-years) or a cementless hemiarthroplasty (11.72 per 1000 person-years) and was relatively low in those treated with a compression hip screw (4.46 per 1000 person-years), cannulated screws (4.50 per 1000 person-years), or a primary arthroplasty with cement (6.2 per 1000 person-years). The highest incidence of fracture was seen in the patients who had required an arthroplasty with cement as a revision procedure following failure of a primary implant (22.39 per 1000 person-years).
CONCLUSIONS: Implant-related fractures following hip fracture surgery are more common than has previously been appreciated. The risk of later ipsilateral femoral fracture is increased by the use of a Gamma nail or a cementless hemiarthroplasty to treat the original hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12107309     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200207000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  17 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of the risk of secondary fracture around short versus long cephalomedullary nails.

Authors:  William E Daner; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Ryan B Graves; Mark C Willis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-08

2.  3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre.

Authors:  Alicja J Bojan; Claudia Beimel; Andreas Speitling; Gilbert Taglang; Carl Ekholm; Anders Jönsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Comparison between locked and unlocked intramedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Auro Caraffa; Domenico Lupariello; Paolo Ceccarini; Giulio Gambaracci; Luigi Meccariello; Francesco Manfreda; Daniele Maiettini; Cristina Ibáñez Vicente; Michele Scialpi; Olga Bisaccia; Giuseppe Rinonapoli; Michele Bisaccia
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-09

4.  [Complications after pertrochanteric fractures].

Authors:  B Füchtmeier; F Gebhard; A Lenich
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Failure of short versus long cephalomedullary nail after intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Pernille Engell Bovbjerg; Morten Schultz Larsen; Carsten Fladmose Madsen; Jesper Schønnemann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-06

Review 6.  Tips and tricks for ORIF of displaced femoral neck fractures in the young adult patient.

Authors:  Stephen C Stacey; Christopher H Renninger; David Hak; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-10

7.  Distal unlocked proximal femoral intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Authors:  Korhan Ozkan; Koray Unay; Can Demircay; Mustafa Cakir; Engin Eceviz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Fatigue fracture of an Austin Moore uncemented hemi-arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  D Martin Taylor; Robert U Ashford; Andrew M Collier
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2004-07-31

9.  Screw versus helical proximal femoral nail in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Col Narinder Kumar; Maj P K Srivastava
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-23

10.  The choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: A case report.

Authors:  Takeshi Utsunomiya; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Kazuyuki Karasuyama; Kazuhiko Sonoda; Yusuke Kubo; Hiroyuki Hatanaka; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.