| Literature DB >> 32054110 |
Zelalem Chernet Lule1, Eyob Wondu Shiferaw1, Jooheon Kim1.
Abstract
Polybutylene succinate (PBS) composites filled with various mass fractions of silicon carbide (SiC) particles were fabricated via slow melt extrusion. The morphological analysis revealed that the fabrication technique assisted in achieving a good adhesion between the PBS and SiC, along with excellent filler dispersion throughout the PBS matrix. The inclusion of 40 wt.% SiC in the PBS composite afforded a 10 °C increase in the thermal degradation temperature and a 160% enhancement in the thermal conductivity relative to the neat PBS. The crystallization temperature also increased with the inclusion of SiC particles, thus making the composites easier to process. Furthermore, the improvement in the Young's modulus of the PBS composites increased their rigidity and stiffness relative to the neat PBS.Entities:
Keywords: extrusion; polymer matrix composite; thermal analysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32054110 PMCID: PMC7077630 DOI: 10.3390/polym12020418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Cross sectional SEM micrographs of the freeze-fractured composites: (a) neat polybutylene succinate (PBS) and (b) PBS-40. (c–f) EDXS mapping of the Si atom in the composites: (c) PBS-10, (d) PBS-20, (e) PBS-30, and (f) PBS-40.
Figure 2(a) TGA thermogram of the neat PBS and the PBS composites; (b) derivative of the TGA curve.
Thermal behavior of the neat PBS and its composites. T—melting temperature; T—crystallization temperature; t—crystallization time; ΔHm—melting enthalpy of the PBS composites; X—level of crystallinity.
| Sample | Δ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neat PBS | 116.7 | 83.9 | 158.3 | 86.1 | 43.0 |
| PBS-10 | 116.7 | 87.4 | 99.9 | 69.6 | 38.7 |
| PBS-20 | 117.2 | 87.9 | 94.7 | 58.9 | 36.8 |
| PBS-30 | 116.2 | 89.0 | 76.9 | 54.6 | 39.0 |
| PBS-40 | 116.2 | 89.7 | 76.4 | 49.6 | 41.3 |
Figure 3DSC thermogram of the neat PBS and the PBS composites: (a) heating (endothermic) peaks and (b) cooling (exothermic) peaks.
Figure 4Thermal conductivity of the neat PBS and PBS composites.
Figure 5Tensile properties of the neat PBS and PBS composites: (a) tensile strength and (b) Young’s modulus.
Figure 6Viscoelastic properties of the neat PBS and the PBS composites: (a) storage modulus and (b) loss factor.