| Literature DB >> 32054018 |
Guangli Li1,2, Jingtao Wu1, Hongguang Jin3, Yonghui Xia4, Jun Liu1, Quanguo He1, Dongchu Chen2.
Abstract
Titania/electro-reducedEntities:
Keywords: Allura Red; TiO2; electro-reduced graphene oxide; voltammetric sensor
Year: 2020 PMID: 32054018 PMCID: PMC7075179 DOI: 10.3390/nano10020307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1TEM images of TiO2 nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) (A) and electro-reduced graphene oxide nanohybrids (TiO2/ErGO) nanohybrids (B).
Figure 2XRD patterns of TiO2 NPs (A), graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets (B), and TiO2/GO nanohybrids (C).
Figure 3FTIR spectra of graphene oxide (GO) and electro-reduced graphene oxide (ErGO).
Figure 4Cyclic voltammograms (A) and Nyquist plots (B) measured at different electrodes in 0.1 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− and KCl mixture solution. The inset in Figure 4B represents the equivalent circuit model.
Figure 5Differential pulse voltammetry (DPVs) of 100 μM Allura Red recorded at different modified electrodes.
Figure 6(A) DPV curves of Allura Red recorded at various pH; (B) The influence of pH on the anodic peak current of Allura Red; (C) Linear relationship between anodic peak potential and pH.
Figure 7(A) Cyclic voltammograms of 10 μM of Allura Red at various scan rates. (B) Linear plots of anodic and cathodic peak currents of Allura Red against the square root of scan rates (v1/2); (C) Linear plots of anodic and cathodic peak potentials against the Napierian logarithm of scan rates (lnv).
Scheme 1Schematic diagram of the electrochemical mechanism for the redox of Allura Red at TiO2/ErGO/GCE.
Figure 8Influence of accumulation time (A) and accumulation potential (B) on the anodic peak currents of Allura Red.
Figure 9(A) Anodic peak current of Allura Red in the presence of 100-fold K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and amaranth; (B) Seven successive measurements of Allura Red at the same TiO2/ErGO/GCE; (C) Anodic peak currents of Allura Red recorded at seven TiO2/ErGO/GCEs; (D) Anodic peak currents of Allura Red were regularly recorded during two weeks. The inset in Figure 9A is DPV of Allura Red in the existence of 100-fold amaranth and all interfering specifies. GCE: glass carbon electrodes.
Figure 10(A) DPV curves of Allura Red with various concentrations; (B) Linear plot of anodic peak currents of Allura Red versus their concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 5.0 μM; (C) Linear plot of anodic peak currents of Allura Red versus Napierian logarithm of their concentrations varying from 5.0 to 800 μM.
Comparison of electroanalytical methods for the determination of Allura Red. LOD: detection limit.
| Methods | Electrodes | Peak Potential (V) | Detection Range (μg/L) | LOD (μg/L) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPV | MWCNT/GCE | 0.68 | 50–600 | 24.8 | [ |
| SWV | CoOx/CPE | −0.25 | 49.6–496 | 24.8 | [ |
| DPV | MWCNT/GCE | 0.72 | 496–4468 | 7.0 | [ |
| SWV | IL-EGPE | 0.72 | 500–5000 | 0.89 | [ |
| DPV | SbF/SPCE | −0.68 | 500–2500 | 149 | [ |
| SWV | CoC/CPE | 0.85 | 59.6–1489 | 39.7 | [ |
| SWV | GCE with CPB | 0.91 | 29.8–5709 | 14.9 | [ |
| SWV | PAMI/GCE | −0.18 | 4964–148,920 | 695 | [ |
| DPV | TiO2/ErGO/GCE | 0.62 | 149–2482; 2482–397,120 | 24.8 | This work |
Determination results of Allura Red in milk drinking samples. RSD: relative standard deviation.
| Samples | Detected (μM) | RSD (%) | Added (μM) | Found (μM) | RSD (%) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milk drinking | 14.28 | 4.26 | 1 | 15.34 | 2.81 | 106.0 |
| 14.28 | 4.26 | 10 | 24.69 | 0.85 | 104.1 | |
| 14.28 | 4.26 | 100 | 112.7 | 4.86 | 98.42 |