Literature DB >> 32053816

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the short-term evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment.

Maria Elena Ainora, Roberto Iezzi, Francesca Romana Ponziani, Matteo Garcovich, Enrico Di Stasio, Laura Riccardi, Brigida Eleonora Annicchiarico, Valeria Abbate, Anna Maria De Gaetano, Massimo Siciliano, Antonio Grieco, Gian Ludovico Rapaccini, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maurizio Pompili, Maria Assunta Zocco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with second-generation contrast agents performed 1-month after HCC treatment is almost as sensitive as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in depicting the residual tumor. However, the efficacy of CEUS performed early after the procedure is still debated. AIM: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the assessment of tumour response shortly after locoregional therapy in patients with unresectable HCC.
METHODS: Ninety-four patients with 104 HCC lesions who were scheduled to receive PEI, RFA, TACE or combined treatment were enrolled in this study. With CECT at 1-month as the reference standard, the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS performed 48-hours after the procedure was evaluated. Patients were followed-up to look for tumor or disease progression.
RESULTS: Based on CECT findings, 43/104 lesions were diagnosed as having residual viability after 1 month. CEUS performed 48-hours after treatment detected residual tumor in 34/43 nodules with treatment failure at CECT with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 79.1%, 96.7%, 94.4%, 86.8% and 89% respectively. There was a high degree of concordance between CEUS and CECT (kappa coefficient=0.78). An hyperemic halo was detectable in 35 lesions without a statistically significant difference between concordant and discordant cases. In patients with uninodular disease responders according to 48 hours CEUS had a significantly longer mean overall survival and time to progression compared to non-responders.
CONCLUSION: CEUS performed 48 hours after treatment can be considered a reliable modality for the evaluation of the real extent of necrosis and has prognostic value in the assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32053816     DOI: 10.1159/000506455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis        ISSN: 0257-2753            Impact factor:   2.404


  5 in total

1.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the treatment response after locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yang Hai; Esika Savsani; Weelic Chong; John Eisenbrey; Andrej Lyshchik
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-19

2.  Application of the CT/MRI LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Si-Min Ruan; Mei-Qing Cheng; Hui Huang; Hang-Tong Hu; Wei Li; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Ming Kuang; Man-Xia Lin; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 3.  Loco-regional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Agostino Inzerillo; Maria Franca Meloni; Adele Taibbi; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  The Relationship between Ultrasonographic Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Severity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Expression of PTEN and Tg737.

Authors:  Lei Tang; Yan Zhang; Qiong Zhou; Qiaojun Hong; Zhanggui Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 5.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Monitoring Treatment Response in Different Stages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mariella Faccia; Matteo Garcovich; Maria Elena Ainora; Laura Riccardi; Maurizio Pompili; Antonio Gasbarrini; Maria Assunta Zocco
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.