Literature DB >> 34410432

Meta-analysis and systematic review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the treatment response after locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Yang Hai1, Esika Savsani1, Weelic Chong2,3, John Eisenbrey1, Andrej Lyshchik4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a useful tool to assess treatment response after percutaneous ablation or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the usefulness of CEUS in identifying residual tumor after locoregional therapy.
METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases were searched from their inception until March 8, 2021, for diagnostic test accuracy studies comparing CEUS to a reference standard for identifying residual tumors after locoregional therapy of HCC. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were obtained using a bivariate random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying the studies based on study design, type of locoregional therapy, CEUS criteria for residual tumor, timing of CEUS follow up, and type of standard reference.
RESULTS: Two reviewers independently evaluated 1479 publications. After full-text review, 142 studies were found to be relevant, and 43 publications (50 cohorts) were finally included. The overall sensitivity of CEUS in detection of residual disease estimated from the bivariate random effects model was 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.89). Similarly, the overall specificity was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96). The diagnostic accuracy was 93.5%. The DOR was 70.1 (95% CI 62.2-148), and the AUROC was 0.95. Importantly, subgroup analysis showed no apparent differences in the diagnostic performance between locoregional therapy (TACE vs. ablation) and criteria used to define residual enhancement, timing of performing CEUS, study design, or type of reference standard.
CONCLUSION: CEUS is a highly accurate method to identify HCC residual tumor after TACE or percutaneous ablation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Locoregional therapy; Microwave ablation; Radiofrequency ablation; Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; Treatment response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34410432      PMCID: PMC8569603          DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03248-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  71 in total

Review 1.  Staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Kinoshita; Hiroshi Onoda; Nao Fushiya; Kazuhiko Koike; Hirokazu Nishino; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 2.  Current management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an Eastern perspective.

Authors:  Hyung Joon Yim; Sang Jun Suh; Soon Ho Um
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Disparities in liver cancer occurrence in the United States by race/ethnicity and state.

Authors:  Farhad Islami; Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Stacey A Fedewa; Elizabeth M Ward; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Andrew Burroughs; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Bridging locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jason T Heckman; Michael B Devera; J Wallis Marsh; Paulo Fontes; Nikhil B Amesur; Shane E Holloway; Michael Nalesnik; David A Geller; Jennifer L Steel; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Up-to-seven criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma liver transplantation: a single center analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Yong Lei; Wen-Tao Wang; Lu-Nan Yan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States, Europe, and Asia: a comprehensive and evidence-based comparison and review.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Kenneth K Tanabe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Patient Selection for Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Importance of Benefit/Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Fabio Piscaglia; Sadahisa Ogasawara
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 11.740

9.  US-triggered Microbubble Destruction for Augmenting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Transarterial Radioembolization: A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg; Corinne E Wessner; Lauren J Delaney; Kristen Bradigan; Sriharsha Gummadi; Mohamed Tantawi; Andrej Lyshchik; Patrick O'Kane; Ji-Bin Liu; Charles Intenzo; Jesse Civan; Warren Maley; Scott W Keith; Kevin Anton; Allison Tan; Amanda Smolock; Susan Shamimi-Noori; Colette M Shaw
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Locoregional treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Riccardo Inchingolo; Alessandro Posa; Martin Mariappan; Stavros Spiliopoulos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Loco-regional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Agostino Inzerillo; Maria Franca Meloni; Adele Taibbi; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-04-07

2.  The Relationship between Ultrasonographic Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Severity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Expression of PTEN and Tg737.

Authors:  Lei Tang; Yan Zhang; Qiong Zhou; Qiaojun Hong; Zhanggui Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.682

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.