Literature DB >> 32052069

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest: a retrospective multicenter study.

Dirk Lunz1, Lorenzo Calabrò2,3, Mirko Belliato4, Enrico Contri4, Lars Mikael Broman5, Anna Maria Scandroglio2, Daniel Patricio3, Maximilian Malfertheiner6, Jacques Creteur3, Alois Philipp7, Fabio Silvio Taccone8, Federico Pappalardo2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the neurologic outcome following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in five European centers.
METHODS: Retrospective database analysis of prospective observational cohorts of patients undergoing ECPR (January 2012-December 2016) was performed. The primary outcome was 3-month favorable neurologic outcome (FO), defined as the cerebral performance categories of 1-2. Survival to ICU discharge and the number of patients undergoing organ donation were secondary outcomes. A subgroup of patients with stringent selection criteria (i.e., age ≤ 65 years, witnessed bystander CPR, no major co-morbidity and ECMO implemented within 1 h from arrest) was also analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 423 patients treated with ECPR were included (median age 57 [48-65] years; male gender 78%); ECPR was initiated for OHCA in 258 (61%) patients. Time from arrest to ECMO implementation was 65 [48-84] min. Eighty patients (19%) had favorable neurological outcome. ICU survival was 24% (n = 102); 23 (5%) non-survivors underwent organ donation procedures. Favorable neurological outcome rate was lower (9% vs. 34%, p < 0.01) in out-of-hospital than in-hospital cardiac arrest and was significantly associated with shorter time from collapse to ECMO. The application of stringent ECPR criteria (n = 105) resulted in 38% of patients with favorable neurologic outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: ECPR was associated with intact neurological recovery in 19% of unselected cardiac arrest victims, with 38% favorable outcome if stringent selection criteria would have been applied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; ECPR; In-hospital; Neurological outcome; Out-of-hospital; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32052069     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-05926-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  14 in total

1.  Extracorporeal life support in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jia Hao Lim; Mathew Jose Chakaramakkil; Boon Kiat Kenneth Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Organ donation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a population-based study of data from the Paris Sudden Death Expertise Center.

Authors:  M Renaudier; Y Binois; F Dumas; L Lamhaut; F Beganton; D Jost; J Charpentier; O Lesieur; E Marijon; X Jouven; A Cariou; W Bougouin
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 10.318

3.  Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation without target temperature management for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients prolongs the therapeutic time window: a retrospective analysis of a nationwide multicentre observational study in Japan.

Authors:  Maki Kitada; Tadashi Kaneko; Shu Yamada; Masahiro Harada; Takeshi Takahashi
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2020-08-03

4.  Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in-hospital cardiac arrest due to acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Mustafa Emre Gürcü; Şeyhmus Külahçıoğlu; Pınar Karaca Baysal; Serdar Fidan; Cem Doğan; Rezzan Deniz Acar; Atakan Erkılınç; Gökhan Alıcı; Nihal Özdemir; Kaan Kırali
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 0.332

5.  Hyperoxia during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest is associated with severe circulatory failure and increased mortality.

Authors:  Jean Bonnemain; Marco Rusca; Zied Ltaief; Aurélien Roumy; Piergiorgio Tozzi; Mauro Oddo; Matthias Kirsch; Lucas Liaudet
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 6.  [Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].

Authors:  Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Keith Couper; Patrick Van de Voorde; Patrick Druwé; Marieke Blom; Gavin D Perkins; Ileana Lulic; Jana Djakow; Violetta Raffay; Gisela Lilja; Leo Bossaert
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 0.826

Review 7.  A review of ECMO for cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Tyler E Klee; Karl B Kern
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-02-06

Review 8.  Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: evidence and implications.

Authors:  Arthur S Slutsky; Alain Combes; Daniel Brodie; Darryl Abrams; Graeme MacLaren; Roberto Lorusso; Susanna Price; Demetris Yannopoulos; Leen Vercaemst; Jan Bělohlávek; Fabio S Taccone; Nadia Aissaoui; Kiran Shekar; A Reshad Garan; Nir Uriel; Joseph E Tonna; Jae Seung Jung; Koji Takeda; Yih-Sharng Chen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  The feasibility of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with active cancer who undergo in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Yo Sep Shin; Pil-Je Kang; Youn-Jung Kim; Seung Mok Ryoo; Sung-Ho Jung; Sang-Bum Hong; Won Young Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Clinical Validation of Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis (CAHP) Score and MIRACLE2 Score to Predict Neurologic Outcomes after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jun-Zuo Wu; Wei-Che Chiu; Wei-Ting Wu; I-Min Chiu; Kuo-Chen Huang; Chih-Wei Hung; Fu-Jen Cheng
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.