Literature DB >> 32051779

Percutaneous Pinning of Pediatric Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Ishaan Swarup1, Michael S Hughes1, Joshua T Bram1, B David Horn1, Theodore J Ganley1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures are relatively common in pediatric patients. These injuries are usually treated nonoperatively in younger children or children with minimally displaced fractures. However, closed reduction or open reduction followed by percutaneous pinning is recommended for older children with displaced fractures. Percutaneous pinning has several advantages, but there are limited reports of a safe and reliable surgical technique in the literature. DESCRIPTION: Patients are positioned in a modified beach-chair position to allow orthogonal imaging. The injured extremity is draped free from the remainder of the body. Closed reduction, which comprises a combination of traction, abduction, and rotation, is attempted. Internal or external rotation may be required, depending on the fracture line and deforming forces. If an anatomic closed reduction cannot be obtained, a block to reduction should be suspected and open reduction should be performed via a deltopectoral approach. Once the fracture is reduced, two 2.5-mm threaded Kirschner wires from the small external fixator set are used to percutaneously fix the fracture. Any small external fixator set can be used, and if not available, individual threaded wires of similar size can be used. Alternatively, Kirschner wires can be advanced to the fracture site prior to reduction and then advanced into the humeral epiphysis once the fracture is reduced. Care is taken to avoid the axillary nerve, which is reliably within 6 cm of the anterolateral aspect of the acromion, and wires are placed distal to this site. Once pin position has been confirmed radiographically, the construct is secured with pin-to-pin clamps to improve rigidity and further decrease the risk of pin migration. A soft dressing and shoulder immobilizer are placed postoperatively. Patients are followed with biweekly radiographs, and pins are removed in the outpatient office or under conscious sedation at 4 weeks. Leaving pins for a longer period may increase the risk of skin irritation and potentially infection. ALTERNATIVES: Alternatives to closed reduction or open reduction and percutaneous pinning include nonoperative management and elastic intramedullary nailing. Nonoperative treatment is a reliable option for most patients. However, it is not suitable for older children with severely displaced fractures because of diminished remodeling potential. Elastic intramedullary nailing is a good option for distal fractures. However, it is not suitable for proximal fractures, and it has been associated with longer operative times and more blood loss than percutaneous pinning. It also requires a second procedure. RATIONALE: This procedure allows for anatomic fixation of proximal humeral fractures and provides a rigid construct to maintain reduction. It is not technically challenging, requires limited postoperative immobilization, and decreases the risk of a second general anesthetic.
Copyright © 2019 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32051779      PMCID: PMC6974310          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.19.00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech        ISSN: 2160-2204


  9 in total

1.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humeral physeal fractures: a matched cohort.

Authors:  George W Chaus; Patrick M Carry; Azin K Pishkenari; Nancy Hadley-Miller
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2015 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus Kirschner wire pinning: outcome of severely displaced proximal humeral fractures in juvenile patients.

Authors:  Tanja Kraus; Stefanie Hoermann; Gudrun Ploder; Silvia Zoetsch; Robert Eberl; Georg Singer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Fractures of the proximal humeral epiphysial plate.

Authors:  C S Neer; B S Horwitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1965 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Physeal injuries of the proximal humerus: long-term results in seventy two patients.

Authors:  Harald Binder; Mark Schurz; Silke Aldrian; Christian Fialka; Vilmos Vécsei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous pin fixation of pediatric proximal humerus fractures: a comparison of complications and early radiographic results.

Authors:  Peter H Hutchinson; Donald S Bae; Peter M Waters
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Severely displaced proximal humeral epiphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Matthew B Dobbs; Scott L Luhmann; J Eric Gordon; William B Strecker; Perry L Schoenecker
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Fractures of the proximal humeral epiphysis.

Authors:  J Burgos-Flores; P Gonzalez-Herranz; J A Lopez-Mondejar; J G Ocete-Guzman; S Amaya-Alarcón
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Proximal humeral fractures in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Sebastian Zipplies; Björn Gunnar Ochs; Jörg Rether; Justus Oehm; Christoph Eingartner; Bernd Rolauffs; Kuno Weise
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2009 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 9.  Age- and severity-adjusted treatment of proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents-A systematical review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Hohloch; Helge Eberbach; Ferdinand C Wagner; Peter C Strohm; Kilian Reising; Norbert P Südkamp; Jörn Zwingmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Arin E Kim; Hannah Chi; Ishaan Swarup
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-10-28

Review 2.  Predictors of outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents: A systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel Abbot; Susanna Proudman; Bhuvanesh Ravichandran; Nicole Williams
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.917

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.