Literature DB >> 25075898

Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humeral physeal fractures: a matched cohort.

George W Chaus1, Patrick M Carry, Azin K Pishkenari, Nancy Hadley-Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Displaced proximal humeral physeal fractures (PHPF) are rare injuries. Because of the lack of comparative studies, treatment has historically been based on surgeon preference. The purpose of this study was to compare treatment outcomes among skeletally immature patients who underwent operative versus nonoperative treatment for Neer-Horwitz (NH) III or IV PHPF.
METHODS: Skeletally immature patients who underwent treatment for a displaced PHPF from 2003 to 2012 were identified. Eligible subjects were invited to complete a validated shoulder outcome instrument (QuickDASH) and a phone survey. A propensity score matching approach was utilized to match subjects who underwent operative treatment to subjects who underwent nonoperative treatment on the basis of age at injury and NH classification.
RESULTS: Seventy patients were identified with a NH III or IV PHPF, of whom 32 subjects completed the study. There was also no difference (P=0.5637) in the proportion of subjects who developed a less than desirable treatment outcome in operative group (57.14%, 4/7) as compared with the nonoperative group (42.86%, 3/7). There was also no difference (P=0.5637) in the proportion of subjects who developed a less than desirable treatment outcome in operative group (57.14%, 4/7) as compared with the nonoperative group. Differences in rate of return to preinjury level of activity (P>0.9999), or cosmetic appearance scores (P>0.999) were not significantly different. QuickDASH scores were 1.9 points (95% CI, 3.0-6.9; P=0.3699) higher overall in the nonoperative group as opposed to the operative group. A less than desirable treatment outcome was noted in 4/23 (17.4%) subjects who underwent nonoperative treatment. Subgroup analysis of the nonoperative cases showed that, for every 1 year increase in age at initial injury, the odds of less than desirable outcome increased by a factor of 3.81 (95% CI, 1.31-21.0).
CONCLUSIONS: In a matched cohort of patients with proximal humerus physeal fractures, there was no difference in occurrence of complications, rate of return to activity, or cosmetic satisfaction. Functional outcomes were also nonsignificant, but tended to be higher among fractures that underwent nonoperative treatment. Among nonoperatively treated fractures, less than desirable outcomes were more common in older patients, particularly those older than 12 years of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25075898     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  9 in total

1.  Percutaneous Pinning of Pediatric Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Ishaan Swarup; Michael S Hughes; Joshua T Bram; B David Horn; Theodore J Ganley
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-10-09

Review 2.  Age- and severity-adjusted treatment of proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents-A systematical review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Hohloch; Helge Eberbach; Ferdinand C Wagner; Peter C Strohm; Kilian Reising; Norbert P Südkamp; Jörn Zwingmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The incidence and treatment trends of pediatric proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Juuli Hannonen; Hanna Hyvönen; Linda Korhonen; Willy Serlo; Juha-Jaakko Sinikumpu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  A Single Retrograde Intramedullary Nail Technique for Treatment of Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in Children: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Eleftheria Samara; Benjamin Tschopp; Barbara Kwiatkowski; Elif Vardar; Nicolas Lutz; Pierre-Yves Zambelli
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 5.  Glenohumeral joint dislocation is rare in children with proximal humeral fractures: a descriptive study and literature review.

Authors:  Pan Hong; Saroj Rai; Ruikang Liu; Xin Tang; Jin Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children: a study protocol for a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Samuel Richard Abbot; Susanna Proudman; Kelly Hall; Nicole Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  The use of the pediatric physeal slide-traction plate in the treatment of neer-horwitz grade IV proximal humeral fractures in children: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Le Qi; Yikun Jiang; Yanbing Wang; Chuangang Peng; Dankai Wu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-14

Review 8.  Predictors of outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents: A systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel Abbot; Susanna Proudman; Bhuvanesh Ravichandran; Nicole Williams
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.917

9.  Health-related quality of life after conservatively and surgically-treated paediatric proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Thoralf R Liebs; Ingmar Rompen; Steffen M Berger; Kai Ziebarth
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.