Masaki Yamazaki1, Etsuko Fujii1,2, Takeshi Watanabe3, Atsuhiko Kato1, Masami Suzuki1,2. 1. Research Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 1-135 Komakado, Gotemba, Shizuoka 412-8513, Japan. 2. Forerunner Pharma Research Co., Ltd., Komaba Open Laboratory, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan. 3. Chugai Research Institute for Medical Science, Inc, 1-135 Komakado, Gotemba, Shizuoka 412-8513, Japan.
Recently, juvenile toxicity testing has become a topic of interest for pathologists, and the
challenges in evaluating juvenile toxicity studies have been discussed[1]. These challenges include how to assess and
interpret histopathological changes in tissues from juvenile animals. Although trained
pathologists are familiar with changes in adult tissues, they often lack experience in
studying neonatal tissues; therefore, information on normal tissue development at different
ages will be helpful for pathologists.Few reports are available on the detailed morphological features in intestinal
development[2], [3]. One well-known phenomenon is the process of crypt
fission, which is important for increasing the number of crypts in neonates but is a rare
event in adults[4], [5], [6]. An important aspect of understanding this process is to comprehend the
process histopathologically. Here, we report the morphological features of crypt fission in
the intestine of neonatal mice.Twelve pregnant mice (C57BL/6J) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Kanagawa,
Japan). Infants were obtained from each parent (n=2–9 each). These parents and their infants
were then divided into 4 groups. Three parent mice and their infants were sacrificed by
exsanguination under deep anesthesia with isoflurane at the following time points: 7, 14, 21,
and 28 days after birth. Samples of the intestine were acquired as cross-sections from the
middle of the jejunum, defined as the first half of the small intestine from the stomach side,
and from the colon immediately adjacent to the cecum. For adults, 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)
was injected into the intestinal lumen for fixation before obtaining cross-sections. The
samples were then fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C for 16–24 h, followed by processing and embedding in
paraffin using the AMeX method[7]. Sections
from each block were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) whereas some representative
blocks were stained with Alcian Blue-Periodic acid-Schiff (AB-PAS). Immunohistochemical
staining with primary antibodies against lysozyme (GTX62819, GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA,
×1,000), Ki67 (#12202, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA, 0.5 µg/mL), and alpha
smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (#19245, Cell Signaling Technology, 0.1 µg/mL) was also performed.
Briefly, the primary antibodies were incubated after antigen retrieval in Target Retrieval
Solution (S1699, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A labeled polymer reagent (EnVision+ Single
Reagents, HRP. Rabbit, K4003, Agilent) was applied as the secondary antibody, and the reaction
was visualized using 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corp., Osaka, Japan)
solution. The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin and observed under a light
microscope.For histopathological evaluation, 6 infants were selected at each time point to include mice
of both sexes (range of ratio to male and female, 1:5–4:2) and at least one infant from each
of the 3 parents. HE slides were scanned using the Aperio scan scope AT2 (Leica Biosystems,
Nussloch, Germany), and the maximum diameter of the jejunum and colon was measured using the
system’s measurement function (one sample per mouse). The number of crypts and fissions in the
total circumference of the jejunum and colon cross-sections were counted (one sample per
mouse), and the distribution of crypt fission was evaluated using light microscopy. All animal
procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals of Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Shizuoka, Japan), and all experimental protocols
were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.The maximum diameter of both the jejunum and colon increased from postnatal day (PND) 7 to 28
(Fig. 1. A–D). At the tip of the villi in the jejunum on PND 7 and 14, ambiguous cell
boundaries and irregularly aligned nuclei were observed (Fig. 2A). Moreover, vacuoles were found in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells at these time
points. At PND 21 and 28, the shape of epithelial cells had become a typical simple columnar
type. At these latter time points, the brush border was more obvious, and the nuclei were
basically aligned on the basal side of the epithelium, but looked like stratified cells in
some areas depending on the section level. Similar findings were observed in the colon (Fig. 2B). In addition to the above findings in the colon
at PND 14, when the mucosa was less thick, goblet cells were located at the tip of the mucosa.
However, when the thickness of the mucosa increased on PND 28, the main type of cells located
at the tip of the mucosa were enterocytes, and goblet cells were located in the middle or at
the base of the mucosa (Fig. 2B). These
morphological changes in the epithelium are thought to be caused by the change in diet from
suckling to weaning[8], [9]. Ki67-positive cells (proliferating cells) were
moderately observed on PND 14, whereas the number of proliferating cells increased on PND 28,
and was almost equivalent to those in adults in both the jejunum and colon (Fig. 3A and B). Lysozyme-positive cells (Paneth cells) were not observed at PND 7, but a few were
observed at the crypt base on PND 14, and this number increased by PND 21 (Fig. 3C). Thus, we found several morphological changes
in the intestine at different postnatal time points.
Fig. 1.
(A) Diameter of the jejunum from postnatal day (PND) 7 to 28 (n=6). (B)
Histopathological images of cross-sections of the jejunum at PND 7 and 21. (C) Diameter
of the colon from PND 7 to 28 (n=6). (D) Histopathological images of cross-sections of
the colon at PND 7 and 21. Values are the mean ± SD. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE)
staining. Bar = 500 µm.
Fig. 2.
(A) Histopathological images of the jejunum at postnatal day (PND) 14, 28, and parent.
Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Alcian Blue-Periodic acid-Schiff (AB-PAS) staining. In
lower rows of the pictures for HE and AB-PAS staining, the surface of mucosa is shown at
high magnification. Bar=100 µm for upper images at lower magnification and 10 µm for
middle and lower images at higher magnification. (B) Histopathological images of the
colon at PND 14, 28, and in the parent. HE and AB-PAS staining. In lower rows of the
pictures for HE and AB-PAS staining, the surface of the mucosa is shown at high
magnification. Bar=100 µm for images of the upper two lines at lower magnification and
10 µm for images in the lower two lines at higher magnification.
Fig. 3.
(A) Images of immunohistochemical staining for Ki67 at postnatal day (PND) 14, 28, and
parent in the jejunum. (B) in the colon. (C) Images of immunohistochemical staining for
the lysozyme in the jejunum at PND 14 and 21. Rectangles indicate the area for higher
magnification images under the pictures. Bar=100 µm for the upper images at lower
magnification and 10 µm for the lower images at higher magnification.
(A) Diameter of the jejunum from postnatal day (PND) 7 to 28 (n=6). (B)
Histopathological images of cross-sections of the jejunum at PND 7 and 21. (C) Diameter
of the colon from PND 7 to 28 (n=6). (D) Histopathological images of cross-sections of
the colon at PND 7 and 21. Values are the mean ± SD. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE)
staining. Bar = 500 µm.(A) Histopathological images of the jejunum at postnatal day (PND) 14, 28, and parent.
Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Alcian Blue-Periodic acid-Schiff (AB-PAS) staining. In
lower rows of the pictures for HE and AB-PAS staining, the surface of mucosa is shown at
high magnification. Bar=100 µm for upper images at lower magnification and 10 µm for
middle and lower images at higher magnification. (B) Histopathological images of the
colon at PND 14, 28, and in the parent. HE and AB-PAS staining. In lower rows of the
pictures for HE and AB-PAS staining, the surface of the mucosa is shown at high
magnification. Bar=100 µm for images of the upper two lines at lower magnification and
10 µm for images in the lower two lines at higher magnification.(A) Images of immunohistochemical staining for Ki67 at postnatal day (PND) 14, 28, and
parent in the jejunum. (B) in the colon. (C) Images of immunohistochemical staining for
the lysozyme in the jejunum at PND 14 and 21. Rectangles indicate the area for higher
magnification images under the pictures. Bar=100 µm for the upper images at lower
magnification and 10 µm for the lower images at higher magnification.The characteristic structure of crypt fission is well-known in the neonatal phase in the
intestine of rodents and humans[4],
[5]. Crypt fission, the process
through which one parent crypt separates into two daughter crypts, is also an important
phenomenon for increasing intestinal stem cells in the developmental phase[10]. Crypt fission observed in the current study
could be categorized into 3 stages. First, the crypt base flattened and shaped like a skirt;
second, stromal cells penetrated vertically into the center of the crypt base; and finally,
one crypt completely separated into two crypts (Fig.
4A). The number of crypts in both the jejunum and colon increased from PND 7 to 28 (Fig. 4B and C), but crypt fission in the jejunum and
colon reached a peak at different times (Fig. 4B and
C). In the jejunum, the number of crypt fissions was very low at PND 7 but had
approximately tripled at PND 14, followed by a decrease, whereas in the colon, the number of
crypt fissions observed at PND 7 was almost the same as that on PND 21 and showed a decrease
at PND 28. In the jejunum, the ratio of crypt fissions to the total number of crypts peaked at
PND 14 and decreased after PND 21 (Fig.4B), whereas
in the colon, the ratio of fissions was the highest at PND 7 and decreased after PND 14 (Fig. 4C). The distribution of crypt fission along the
entire circumference of the intestine is described in Fig.
4D and E. Crypt fission was diffused along the entire circumference in both the
jejunum and colon. The number of crypt fissions is thought to be influenced by suckling and
weaning in rodents and humans[8]. During the
milk feeding period, crypt fission is observed frequently, but is markedly reduced after
weaning, when crypt hyperplasia starts to predominate over crypt fission. A difference in the
incidence of crypt fission between the small and large intestines in rats has been
reported[11], but the underlying reason
remains unclear.
Fig. 4.
(A) Different stages of crypt fission in the jejunum and colon. The left two images of
two lines show the first stage of crypt fission, in which the crypt base becomes “flat”,
shaped like a skirt. The middle two images of two lines show the second stage of crypt
fission, when some stromal cells “penetrate” the center of the crypt base. The right
images show the final stage of crypt fission, which shows complete “division” into two
daughter crypts. Arrows indicate crypt fission. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining.
Bar=20 µm. (B) Number of crypts, number of fissions, and percentage of fissions to
crypts in the jejunum at postnatal day (PND) 7 to 28. Values are the mean ± SD (n=6).
(C) Number of crypts, number of fissions, and percentage of fissions to crypts in the
colon at PND 7 to 28. Values are the mean ± SD (n=6). (D) Distribution of crypt fission
in the jejunum at PND 14. Red dots indicate crypt fission. Triangle indicates the
mesentery. Three representative animals were analyzed. (E) Distribution of crypt fission
in the colon at PND 14.
(A) Different stages of crypt fission in the jejunum and colon. The left two images of
two lines show the first stage of crypt fission, in which the crypt base becomes “flat”,
shaped like a skirt. The middle two images of two lines show the second stage of crypt
fission, when some stromal cells “penetrate” the center of the crypt base. The right
images show the final stage of crypt fission, which shows complete “division” into two
daughter crypts. Arrows indicate crypt fission. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining.
Bar=20 µm. (B) Number of crypts, number of fissions, and percentage of fissions to
crypts in the jejunum at postnatal day (PND) 7 to 28. Values are the mean ± SD (n=6).
(C) Number of crypts, number of fissions, and percentage of fissions to crypts in the
colon at PND 7 to 28. Values are the mean ± SD (n=6). (D) Distribution of crypt fission
in the jejunum at PND 14. Red dots indicate crypt fission. Triangle indicates the
mesentery. Three representative animals were analyzed. (E) Distribution of crypt fission
in the colon at PND 14.In crypt bases during crypt fission, AB-PAS-positive cells (Paneth cells or goblet cells)
were not specifically located and Ki67-positive cells were diffuse, unlike in the crypt bases
seen in adults (Fig. 5A). This suggests that crypt fission occurs regardless of the cell type, including
differentiated and proliferating cells, which are rarely observed in the crypt base of adults
(refer to Fig. 3A, parent). This could be
indispensable to crypt fission. Almost all stromal cells were positive for α-SMA, and these
stromal cells penetrated the crypt base during crypt fission on PND 14 (Fig. 5B). In addition, the α-SMA-positive stromal cells surrounding the
crypt base were plumper at PND 14 than in the parent (Fig.
5C). Further, there were fewer lymphocytes in the lamina propria on PND 14 than those
in the parent, which makes α-SMA-positive stromal cells the most common components of the
lamina propria in neonatal mice. These observations suggest that the dynamic re-arrangement of
the intestinal structure involved in crypt fission is caused by cooperation between epithelial
cells and their surrounding stromal cells.
Fig. 5.
(A) Histopathological images of crypt fission in the jejunum stained with Alcian
Blue-Periodic acid-Schiff (AB-PAS) and anti-Ki67 antibody at postnatal day (PND) 14.
Bar=10 µm. (B) Histopathological images for the interstitium surrounding crypt fission
in the jejunum at PND 14 stained with anti-alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) antibody.
α-SMA-positive stromal cells (myofibroblasts) penetrate the center of the crypt base in
crypt fission. As a reference, images for the non-crypt fission area at PND 14 are also
shown. The arrow indicates the crypt fission. Bar=100 µm for upper images at lower
magnification and 10 µm for lower images at higher magnification. (C) Histopathological
images for the interstitium surrounding the crypt of parents in the jejunum stained with
an anti-α-SMA antibody. Bar=100 µm for the left image at lower magnification and 10 µm
for the right image at higher magnification.
(A) Histopathological images of crypt fission in the jejunum stained with Alcian
Blue-Periodic acid-Schiff (AB-PAS) and anti-Ki67 antibody at postnatal day (PND) 14.
Bar=10 µm. (B) Histopathological images for the interstitium surrounding crypt fission
in the jejunum at PND 14 stained with anti-alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) antibody.
α-SMA-positive stromal cells (myofibroblasts) penetrate the center of the crypt base in
crypt fission. As a reference, images for the non-crypt fission area at PND 14 are also
shown. The arrow indicates the crypt fission. Bar=100 µm for upper images at lower
magnification and 10 µm for lower images at higher magnification. (C) Histopathological
images for the interstitium surrounding the crypt of parents in the jejunum stained with
an anti-α-SMA antibody. Bar=100 µm for the left image at lower magnification and 10 µm
for the right image at higher magnification.The stroma act as a physical support for the intestinal structure as well as a source of
growth factors for the development and proliferation of epithelial cells[12]. In this study, we evaluated the relationship of
crypt fission with the surrounding stromal cells in intestinal development and found that
cells penetrating the crypt were always α-SMA-positive (myofibroblasts). The surrounding
stromal cells are also thought to contribute to the increase in epithelial cells by acting as
a scaffold that expands the surface area of the villi-crypt axis. The evidence supporting this
notion is that when intestinal epithelial stem cells are co-cultured in vitro
with intestinal subepithelial myofibroblasts, the enteroids are larger and have improved
viability[13]. In addition, although the
source of these factors is not always limited to the stroma, there are reports concerning the
relationship of crypt fission with differentiation/proliferation signals[5], [14], [15],
[16] and inflammatory
diseases[17] in rodents and humans. In
summary, these indications of mutual dependence suggest that physical interaction between
epithelial cells and stromal cells is needed to complete the intestinal structure.Crypt fission is observed both at the developmental phase and during crypt regeneration after
intestinal injury, such as with ischemia, infection, irradiation, inflammatory bowel
disease[18], or chemotherapy[19]. Moreover, crypt fission is a potential
candidate to explain how the number of tumor cells expands during early
tumorigenesis[19]. Once the number of
proliferating cells reaches a threshold, crypts undergo fission, and an adenoma or carcinoma
is generated. Fission is also recognized as the mechanism through which a mutated clone of
stem cells expands in the gastrointestinal tract[20]. Based on these studies, crypt fission is a key phenomenon that causes
balance or imbalance in the epithelial hierarchy of both stem and differentiated cells in
these conditions. Examination of crypt fission provides important clues to evaluate the
condition of the intestine. Therefore, a greater understanding of the detailed morphology of
crypt fission in neonates is important to evaluate juvenile toxicity studies more accurately.
Such knowledge may also facilitate more appropriate evaluation in stages when other dynamic
intestinal changes occur, including adult toxicity or disease. For example, it has been
reported that the number of crypts increase following incremental crypt fission during the
regeneration phase after doxorubicin treatment[21].
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors: M Dauça; F Bouziges; S Colin; M Kedinger; M K Keller; J Schilt; P Simon-Assmann; K Haffen Journal: Int J Dev Biol Date: 1990-03 Impact factor: 2.203
Authors: Jane K Fauser; Rino P Donato; Joshua A Woenig; Simon J Proctor; Andrew P Trotta; Phulwinder K Grover; Gordon S Howarth; Irmeli A Penttila; Adrian G Cummins Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Adrian G Cummins; Anthony G Catto-Smith; Donald J Cameron; Richard T Couper; Geoffrey P Davidson; Andrew S Day; Paul D Hammond; David J Moore; Fiona M Thompson Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Christopher M Dekaney; Ajay S Gulati; Aaron P Garrison; Michael A Helmrath; Susan J Henning Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 4.052