Literature DB >> 32050229

Comparison of formula accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation based on measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography optical biometer.

Giacomo Savini1, Kenneth J Hoffer, Nicole Balducci, Piero Barboni, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) optical biometer.
SETTING: IRCCS G.B. Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy.
DESIGN: Evaluation of a diagnostic test instrument.
METHODS: Preoperative measurements by the OA-2000 (Tomey Inc.) were taken in a consecutive series of patients undergoing cataract surgery with one IOL model (AcrySof SN60WF; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.). Measurements were entered into the following formulas: Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Holladay 2 with axial length adjustment, Kane, Olsen, Panacea, SRK/T, T2, and VRF. When refraction was measured at 1 month postoperatively, the mean arithmetic prediction error, the median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentage of eyes with a error of ±0.50 D or less were calculated after constant optimization.
RESULTS: We enrolled 150 eyes. All formulas yielded excellent outcomes. The MedAE ranged between 0.200 D and 0.259 D, with a statistically significant difference among formulas (P = .0004). The lowest MedAE values were obtained with the Barrett, EVO, Kane, Olsenstandalone, Radial Basis Function (RBF), and T2 formulas. The percentage of eyes with a prediction error of ±0.50 D or less ranged between 80.00% and 90.67%, with a statistically significant difference (P < .0001). The Barrett, EVO, Holladay 2 with axial length adjustment, Kane, RBF, and T2 achieved the highest percentages (≥88%).
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements provided by the SS-OCT optical biometer enable accurate IOL power calculation because all formulas yielded a prediction error within 0.50 D in at least 80% of eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32050229     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  16 in total

1.  Accuracy of new-generation intraocular lens calculation formulas in eyes with variations in predicted refraction.

Authors:  Pingjun Chang; Shuyi Qian; Yalan Wang; Siyan Li; Fuman Yang; Yiwen Hu; Zhuohan Liu; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Evaluation of IOL power calculation with the Kane formula for pediatric cataract surgery.

Authors:  Uri Elbaz; Ruti Sella; Olga Reitblat; Sina Khalili; Asim Ali; Kamiar Mireskandari; Yakov Vega; Raimo Tuuminen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Comparing the accuracy of the new-generation intraocular lens power calculation formulae in axial myopic eyes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongyu Li; Zi Ye; Yu Luo; Zhaohui Li
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.029

Review 4.  Refractive Outcomes of Non-Toric and Toric Intraocular Lenses in Mild, Moderate and Advanced Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tal Yahalomi; Asaf Achiron; Idan Hecht; Roee Arnon; Eliya Levinger; Joseph Pikkel; Raimo Tuuminen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study.

Authors:  Diogo Hipólito-Fernandes; Maria Elisa Luís; Pedro Gil; Vitor Maduro; João Feijão; Tun Kuan Yeo; Oleksiy Voytsekhivskyy; Nuno Alves
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-16

6.  Determining the Theoretical Effective Lens Position of Thick Intraocular Lenses for Machine Learning-Based IOL Power Calculation and Simulation.

Authors:  Damien Gatinel; Guillaume Debellemanière; Alain Saad; Mathieu Dubois; Radhika Rampat
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Comparison of three newer generation freely available intraocular lens power calculation formulae across all axial lengths.

Authors:  Zain Irfan Khatib; Suhas S Haldipurkar; Vijay Shetty; Harsha Dahake; Pranoti Nagvekar; Priyanka Kashelkar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 8.  Application of artificial intelligence in cataract management: current and future directions.

Authors:  Laura Gutierrez; Jane Sujuan Lim; Li Lian Foo; Wei Yan Ng; Michelle Yip; Gilbert Yong San Lim; Melissa Hsing Yi Wong; Allan Fong; Mohamad Rosman; Jodhbir Singth Mehta; Haotian Lin; Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Daniel Shu Wei Ting
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-07

9.  Does Every Calculation Formula Fit for All Types of Intraocular Lenses? Optimization of Constants for Tecnis ZA9003 and ZCB00 Is Necessary.

Authors:  Ivajlo Popov; Veronika Popova; Juraj Sekac; Vladimir Krasnik
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Inter-eye Differences in Ocular Biometric Parameters of Concomitant Exotropia.

Authors:  Weifen Gong; Haoyu Chen; Fan Yang; Shibin Lin; Chao Li; Geng Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.