Literature DB >> 32049289

Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Unexpected Newborn Complications Among Term Neonates in US Hospitals.

Mark A Clapp1,2, Kaitlyn E James1,2, Sara V Bates3, Anjali J Kaimal1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: Unexpected complications in term newborns have been recently adopted by the Joint Commission as a marker of obstetric care quality. Objective: To understand the variation and patient and hospital factors associated with severe unexpected complications in term neonates among hospitals in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study collected data from all births in US counties with 1 obstetric hospital using county-identified birth certificate data and American Hospital Association annual survey data from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017. All live-born, term, singleton infants weighing at least 2500 g were included. The data analysis was performed from December 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. Exposures: Severe unexpected newborn complication, defined as neonatal death, 5-minute Apgar score of 3 or less, seizure, use of assisted ventilation for at least 6 hours, or transfer to another facility. Main Outcomes and Measures: Between-hospital variation and patient and hospital factors associated with unexpected newborn complications.
Results: A total of 1 754 852 births from 576 hospitals were included in the analysis. A wide range of hospital complication rates was found (range, 0.6-89.9 per 1000 births; median, 15.3 per 1000 births [interquartile range, 9.6-22.0 per 1000 births]). Hospitals with high newborn complication rates were more likely to care for younger, white, less educated, and publicly insured women with more medical comorbidities compared with hospitals with low complication rates. In the adjusted models, there was little effect of case mix to explain the observed between-county variation (11.3%; 95% CI, 10.0%-12.6%). Neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complication rates, especially among hospitals with the highest rates (66.0% of all complications). The risk for unexpected neonatal complication increased by more than 50% for those neonates born at hospitals without a neonatal intensive care unit compared with those with a neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.75). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, severe unexpected complication rates among term newborns varied widely. When included in the metric numerator, neonatal transfer was the primary factor associated with complications, especially among hospitals with the highest rates. Transfers were more likely to be necessary when infants were born in hospitals with lower levels of neonatal care. Thus, if this metric is to be used in its current form, it would appear that accreditors, regulatory bodies, and payers should consider adjusting for or stratifying by a hospital's level of neonatal care to avoid disincentivizing against appropriate transfers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32049289      PMCID: PMC8693709          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  21 in total

1.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 647: Limitations of Perineal Lacerations as an Obstetric Quality Measure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors.

Authors:  Dean V Coonrod; David Drachman; Paula Hobson; Maria Manriquez
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Hospital-Level Variation in Postpartum Readmissions.

Authors:  Mark A Clapp; Sarah E Little; Jie Zheng; Anjali J Kaimal; Julian N Robinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.

Authors:  Yuri V Sebastião; Lindsay Womack; Cheryl A Vamos; Judette M Louis; Funmilayo Olaoye; Taylor Caragan; Omonigho M Bubu; Linda A Detman; John S Curran; William M Sappenfield
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  A multi-state analysis of postpartum readmissions in the United States.

Authors:  Mark A Clapp; Sarah E Little; Jie Zheng; Julian N Robinson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Special Report: Current approaches to measuring quality of care in obstetrics.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bailit; Kimberly D Gregory; Sindhu Srinivas; Thomas Westover; William A Grobman; George R Saade
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Evaluation of third-degree and fourth-degree laceration rates as quality indicators.

Authors:  Alexander M Friedman; Cande V Ananth; Eri Prendergast; Mary E D'Alton; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Evaluating risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rate as a measure of obstetric quality.

Authors:  Sindhu K Srinivas; Corinne Fager; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Michael R Law; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Yinglei Lai; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Hospital Geographic Location and Unexpected Complications in term Newborns in Florida.

Authors:  Hanadi Y Hamadi; Jing Xu; Aurora A Tafili; Farouk S Smith; Aaron C Spaulding
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-10-06

2.  A prediction nomogram for neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome in late-preterm infants and full-term infants: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Jing Li; Jingyu Guo; Yuan Shi; Li Wang
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-06-25

3.  Low birthweight in term singletons mediates the association between maternal smoking intensity exposure status and immediate neonatal intensive care unit admission: the E-value assessment.

Authors:  Anthony J Kondracki
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Improving birth certificate data accuracy in Alabama.

Authors:  Samuel J Gentle; Matthew Moore; Rosemary Blackmon; Brenda Brugh; Allison Todd; Martha Wingate; Sara Mazzoni
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26

5.  Measuring quality of care in moderate and late preterm infants.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Salazar; Sara C Handley; Lucy T Greenberg; Erika M Edwards; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.