Literature DB >> 26488522

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 647: Limitations of Perineal Lacerations as an Obstetric Quality Measure.

.   

Abstract

Perineal lacerations are a common occurrence with vaginal delivery. Although perineal lacerations are tracked easily from coding data, there are a variety of problems with using rates of such tears as a quality measure. The rate of severe perineal lacerations should not be used as a measure of obstetric quality for the following three reasons: 1) third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations may not be defined uniformly; 2) severe perineal lacerations are associated strongly with nonmodifiable risk factors; and 3) diminishing the use of operative vaginal delivery, in an effort to decrease severe perineal lacerations, likely would result in an increased rate of cesarean delivery. Measuring the rate of episiotomy with unassisted vaginal deliveries is an alternative candidate for quality measurement, but it requires validation before widespread implementation.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26488522     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  Quality of Care and Disparities in Obstetrics.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Delivery Complications and Postpartum Hospital Use in California.

Authors:  Chen Y Wang; Lynn M Yee; Joseph M Feinglass
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-09-25

3.  Patient and Hospital Factors Associated With Unexpected Newborn Complications Among Term Neonates in US Hospitals.

Authors:  Mark A Clapp; Kaitlyn E James; Sara V Bates; Anjali J Kaimal
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-02-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.