| Literature DB >> 32048455 |
Embry Howell1, Timothy Waidmann1, Nancy Birdsall2, Nikhil Holla3, Kevin Jiang4.
Abstract
The new millennium brought renewed attention to improving the health of women and children. In this same period, direct deaths from conflicts have declined worldwide, but civilian deaths associated with conflicts have increased. Nigeria is among the most conflict-prone countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, especially recently with the Boko Haram insurgency in the north. This paper uses two data sources, the 2013 Demographic and Health Survey for Nigeria and the Social Conflict Analysis Database, linked by geocode, to study the effect of these conflicts on infant and young child acute malnutrition (or wasting). We show a strong association in 2013 between living close to a conflict zone and acute malnutrition in Nigerian children, with larger effects for rural children than urban children. This is related to the severity of the conflict, measured both in terms of the number of conflict deaths and the length of time the child was exposed to conflict. Undoubtedly, civil conflict is limiting the future prospects of Nigerian children and the country's economic growth. In Nigeria, conflicts in the north are expected to continue with sporadic attacks and continued damaged infrastructure. Thus, Nigerian children, innocent victims of the conflict, will continue to suffer the consequences documented in this study.Entities:
Keywords: Nigeria; child health; conflict; malnutrition; war; wasting
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32048455 PMCID: PMC7296780 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
Summary of findings from empirical studies of the effect of conflict on mothers and children
| Citation | Countries | Dates of study | Key findings | Study limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| African countries | ||||
| Akresh, Lucchetti, and Thirumurthy ( | Eritrea and Ethiopia | 2002 | War‐exposed children had 22% lower height‐for‐age scores than non‐war‐exposed children. | Conflict exposure measured by living in a conflict region. |
| Avogo and Agadjanian ( | Angola | 2004 | Child mortality was twice as high if the child experienced war‐related forced migration in the previous year. | Sample limited to two urban municipalities. |
| Coghlan et al. ( | DRC | 2003–2004 | The under 5 mortality rate was twice as high in health zones reporting violence as in health zones not reporting violence. | 5 million people could not be included in population sampled due to security issues. |
| Dabelen and Paul ( | Cote d'Ivoire | 2002–2008 | Households in departments with at least one conflict event were more food insecure. Outcomes were worse for households with women and children. | No measure of intensity of conflict exposure (e.g., duration or deaths). |
| Delbiso et al. ( | Ethiopia | 2000–2013 | Weight‐for‐height (wasting) was lowest in drought‐prone areas. Conflict events did not have a significant impact on wasting after controlling for drought. | Used aggregate data from a variety of surveys and populations; no measure of conflict intensity. |
| Guha‐Sapir, van Panhuis, Degomme and Teran ( | Angola, DRC, Ethiopia, Sudan | 2000–2004 | In all countries, the conflict zones experienced higher child mortality and acute malnutrition than nationally. | Used aggregate data from a variety of surveys and populations; not nationally representative. |
| Kinyoki et al. ( | Somalia | 2007–2010 | Children exposed to recent conflict had a higher risk of wasting (OR = 1.38). Risk of stunting was similar. Children exposed to longer conflicts had higher risk. | No adjustment for intensity of conflict (e.g., number of deaths). |
| Lindskog ( | DRC | 2007–2014 | Postneonatal mortality was highest where conflict events and deaths were extremely high. Neonatal mortality was not affected by conflict levels. | Conflict levels measured at the province level. |
| Minoiu and Shemyakin ( | Cote d'Ivoire | 2002–2008 | Children in conflict zones had significantly lower height‐for‐age scores. | Conflict exposure measured by living in a conflict region; no measure of conflict intensity. |
| Namasivayam, Arcos, Castro and Chi ( | Uganda | 1988–2011 | Women in the conflict zone had lower rates of contraception use and institutional delivery but higher rates of skilled delivery. | Conflict exposure measured by living in conflict zone; no measure of conflict intensity. |
| Verwimp ( | Burundi | 1998–2007 | Children exposed to civil war in their area of residence had a 10% increase in the probability of dying. | Small sample size ( |
| Wagner et al. ( | 35 African countries | 1995–2015 | The risk of infant death greatly increased when the family lived near an armed conflict. Infant deaths related to conflict were over three times the number of direct deaths from conflicts. | Lack of adjustment for migration. |
| Other countries | ||||
| Ascherio et al. ( | Iraq | 1991 | Age‐adjusted child mortality rates were three times as high after the Gulf War in 1991 than before the war. | No measure of intensity of conflict exposure. |
| Guerrero‐Serdan ( | Iraq | 2000–2006 | Children born in the highest intensity conflict provinces during the Iraq war of 2003 were .8 cm shorter than children born in low conflict provinces. | Conflict exposure measured by living in a conflict region or district. |
| Mashal et al. ( | Afghanistan | 2006 | Internal displacement was associated with low weight‐for‐age in children. | Sample restricted to two urban districts; no direct measure of conflict exposure. |
| Savitz et al. ( | Vietnam | 1960–1988 | Postneonatal mortality increased significantly during the war. Neonatal mortality and childhood mortality did not change significantly during the war. There was no increase in infant or child mortality after the war. | No measure of intensity of conflict exposure. |
| Skokic, Muratovic and Radoja ( | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1988–2003 | Perinatal and maternal mortality were higher during the war, mainly due to limited access to health services. | Sample restricted to mothers delivering in one canton. No adjustment for maternal or household characteristics. |
Figure 1Conceptual framework for impact of conflict on child acute malnutrition [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Characteristics of mothers and children in study group: Nigeria, 2013
| Urban | Rural | |
|---|---|---|
| Child characteristics | ||
| Birth order (continuous) | 3.6 | 4.1 |
| Gender (male) | 49.5% | 49.5% |
| Preceding birth interval (months) | 37.9 | 36.4 |
| Mother characteristics | ||
| Age at child's birth (years) | 28.4 | 27.2 |
| Education | ||
| No education | 21.1% | 61.7% |
| Primary school | 21.6% | 18.6% |
| Secondary school | 44.4% | 17.4% |
| Higher than secondary school | 12.9% | 2.2% |
| Not married | 4.3% | 3.4% |
| Household characteristics | ||
| Household size | 6.6 | 7.4 |
| Wealth | ||
| Poorest | 3.0% | 33.5% |
| Poorer | 6.6% | 30.9% |
| Middle | 16.0% | 21.0% |
| Richer | 32.3% | 10.9% |
| Richest | 42.1% | 3.7% |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Hausa/Fulani | 26.9% | 50.2% |
| Igbo/Ig | 23.3% | 4.8% |
| Yoruba | 25.4% | 4.5% |
| Other | 24.3% | 40.5% |
| Region | ||
| North Central | 8.9% | 18.0% |
| North East | 11.5% | 20.2% |
| North West | 23.4% | 41.3% |
| South East | 17.5% | 4.2% |
| South South | 8.9% | 9.5% |
| South West | 29.8% | 6.8% |
|
| 8,507 | 15,961 |
Source: Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey, 2013.
Average annual exposure to conflicts: Children ages 0–4, Nigeria, 2013
| Average annual exposure to conflicts by type (unweighted) | Urban | Rural |
|---|---|---|
| Demonstration | 0.62 | 0.08 |
| Violent riot | 0.13 | 0.04 |
| Internal governmental violence | 1.82 | 0.46 |
| External governmental violence | 1.75 | 0.45 |
| Average annual total conflicts during exposure period (unweighted) | 4.32 | 1.04 |
| Average annual conflict deaths (unweighted) | 8.94 | 2.43 |
| Average annual length of conflict (days, unweighted) | 11.85 | 3.08 |
| Average annual conflict deaths (weighted) | 1.83 | 0.14 |
| Average annual length of conflict (days, weighted) | 2.78 | 0.16 |
Demonstration—Peaceful action directed toward members of another group or government authorities.
Strike—Engaging in abandonment of workplaces and public facilities.
Violent Riot—violent action directed towards members of another group or government authorities.
Internal governmental violence—violence waged against government authorities, by government authorities, or within the government itself.
External governmental violence—violence waged by nonstate groups without government actors or targets.
Logistic regression predicting risk of child wasting: Ages 0–4, Nigeria, 2013
| Control variables | Conflicts exposure: Weighted deaths | Conflict exposure: Weighted days | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban | Rural | Urban | Rural | |
| Conflict deaths weighted by distance (continuous) | 1.05 | 1.17 | — | — |
| Conflict days weighted by distance (continuous) | — | — | 1.04 | 1.13 |
| Preceding birth interval (continuous months) | 0.999 | 1.001 | 1.000 | 1.001 |
| Birth order (continuous) | 1.02 | 0.97 | 1.02 | 0.97 |
| Child gender (male) | 1.29 | 1.07 | 1.28 | 1.07 |
| Mother's age at child's birth (continuous years) | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 1.01 |
| Mother's highest education level | ||||
| No education (reference) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Any primary school | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.81 |
| Any secondary school | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.84 | 0.70 |
| Higher than secondary school | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.58 |
| Mother not married | 0.98 | 0.72 | 0.98 | 0.72 |
| Number of household members (continuous) | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.996 | 1.00 |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Hausa/Fulani (reference) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Igbo/Ig | 1.39 | 0.61 | 1.61 | 0.61 |
| Yoruba | 1.36 | 0.51 | 1.57 | 0.51 |
| Other | 1.57 | 0.84 | 1.75 | 0.85 |
| Region | ||||
| North West (reference) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| North Central | 0.23 | 0.65 | 0.23 | 0.68 |
| North East | 0.30 | 0.97 | 0.40 | 0.99 |
| South East | 0.24 | 1.02 | 0.23 | 1.04 |
| South South | 0.19 | 0.67 | 0.19 | 0.66 |
| South West | 0.23 | 0.54 | 0.21 | 0.54 |
|
| 8,507 | 15,961 | 8,507 | 15,961 |
Note. Year of child's birth is also included in the regression.
p < .01.;
p < .05.;
p < .10 (borderline significance).