Literature DB >> 32047965

Assessment of micafungin loading dosage regimens against Candida spp. in ICU patients by Monte Carlo simulations.

Xiaoqing Lu1, Gaoqi Xu2,3,4, Lu Chen1, Jingjing Fan5, Mengxue Li1, Liqin Zhu6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of loading dose on micafungin by simulating different dosage regimens.
METHODS: A published study of micafungin in ICU patients was employed to simulate nine different dosage regimens which were sorted out three groups in terms of three maintenance doses. Using pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data, 5000-subject Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to simulate concentration-time profiles of micafungin, calculate probabilities of target attainment (PTAs), and cumulative fractions of response (CFRs) in terms of AUC/MIC targets. PTAs were calculated using AUC/MIC cut-offs: 285 (Candida parapsilosis), 3000 (all Candida spp.), and 5000 (non-parapsilosis Candida spp.). PTA or CFR > 90% was considered optimal for a dosage regimen.
RESULTS: The concentration-time profiles of micafungin-simulated dosage regimens were obtained. PTA values were over 90% while applying the loading dose in each group of regimens: for Candida albicans and Candida glabrata (AUC/MIC = 5000), all regimens with loading dose provided PTAs of ≥ 90% for MIC ≤ 0.008 mg/L. The PTAs (AUC/MIC = 3000) were over 90% for MIC ≤ 0.008 mg/L in any regimen. However, for MIC inferior to 0.016 mg/L, only loading dosage regimens provided PTAs exceeding 90%. For C. parapsilosis (AUC/MIC = 285), the maximum MIC of achieving a PTA ≥ 90% was 0.25 mg/L both in the regimens of B (150 mg maintenance dose) and C (200 mg maintenance dose) with loading dose. In addition, CFR of any regimen with loading dose was ≥ 90% against C. albicans and C. glabrata. None of the dosage regimens achieved an expected CFR against C. parapsilosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The dosage regimen of micafungin which had a loading dose of 1.5 times was more suitable for ICU patients infected by Candida spp.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida spp.; ICU patients; Loading dose; Micafungin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32047965     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02840-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  29 in total

1.  Standardization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) terminology for anti-infective drugs.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Michael N Dudley; Otto Cars; Hartmut Derendorf; George L Drusano
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  In vivo comparison of the pharmacodynamic targets for echinocandin drugs against Candida species.

Authors:  D Andes; D J Diekema; M A Pfaller; J Bohrmuller; K Marchillo; A Lepak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A study to determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose of micafungin (FK463) in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  B Sirohi; R L Powles; R Chopra; N Russell; J L Byrne; H G Prentice; M Potter; S Koblinger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  [Relationship between the effectiveness and dose of micafungin in the treatment of candidemia].

Authors:  Takafumi Sugawara; Noritaka Murakami; Nobue Uetake; Shunji Matsumoto; Shinichi Miyamori; Ryouichi Okamoto; Kouichi Hiraki
Journal:  Yakugaku Zasshi       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.302

5.  International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Jordi Rello; John Marshall; Eliezer Silva; Antonio Anzueto; Claude D Martin; Rui Moreno; Jeffrey Lipman; Charles Gomersall; Yasser Sakr; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Relationship between the initial dose of micafungin and its efficacy in patients with candidemia.

Authors:  Yasuo Ota; Keita Tatsuno; Shu Okugawa; Shintaro Yanagimoto; Takatoshi Kitazawa; Atsuhito Fukushima; Kunihisa Tsukada; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 2.211

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of sporotrichosis: 2007 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Carol A Kauffman; Beatriz Bustamante; Stanley W Chapman; Peter G Pappas
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Increasing incidence of Candida parapsilosis candidemia with caspofungin usage.

Authors:  Graeme N Forrest; Elizabeth Weekes; Jennifer K Johnson
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 6.072

9.  Moxifloxacin population pharmacokinetics and model-based comparison of efficacy between moxifloxacin and ofloxacin in African patients.

Authors:  Simbarashe P Zvada; Paolo Denti; Frederick A Sirgel; Emmanuel Chigutsa; Mark Hatherill; Salome Charalambous; Stanley Mungofa; Lubbe Wiesner; Ulrika S H Simonsson; Amina Jindani; Thomas Harrison; Helen M McIlleron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Micafungin.

Authors:  Roeland E Wasmann; Eline W Muilwijk; David M Burger; Paul E Verweij; Catherijne A Knibbe; Roger J Brüggemann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.