| Literature DB >> 32047130 |
Erin Connelly1, Charo I Del Genio2, Freya Harrison3.
Abstract
The pharmacopeia used by physicians and laypeople in medieval Europe has largely been dismissed as placebo or superstition. While we now recognize that some of the materia medica used by medieval physicians could have had useful biological properties, research in this area is limited by the labor-intensive process of searching and interpreting historical medical texts. Here, we demonstrate the potential power of turning medieval medical texts into contextualized electronic databases amenable to exploration by the use of an algorithm. We used established methodologies from network science to reveal patterns in ingredient selection and usage in a key text, the 15th-century Lylye of Medicynes, focusing on remedies to treat symptoms of microbial infection. In providing a worked example of data-driven textual analysis, we demonstrate the potential of this approach to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration and to shine a new light on the ethnopharmacology of historical medical texts.IMPORTANCE We used established methodologies from network science to identify patterns in medicinal ingredient combinations in a key medieval text, the 15th-century Lylye of Medicynes, focusing on recipes for topical treatments for symptoms of microbial infection. We conducted experiments screening the antimicrobial activity of selected ingredients. These experiments revealed interesting examples of ingredients that potentiated or interfered with each other's activity and that would be useful bases for future, more detailed experiments. Our results highlight (i) the potential to use methodologies from network science to analyze medieval data sets and detect patterns of ingredient combination, (ii) the potential of interdisciplinary collaboration to reveal different aspects of the ethnopharmacology of historical medical texts, and (iii) the potential development of novel therapeutics inspired by premodern remedies in a time of increased need for new antibiotics.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance; antimicrobial agents; antimicrobial combinations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32047130 PMCID: PMC7018648 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.03136-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1Community co-occurrence of ingredients. Every pixel in the figure corresponds to a pair of ingredients. The saturation of the color is proportional to the number of times that the pair of ingredients is found in the same community, according to the scale on the right-hand border of the figure.
Effects of selected individual agents, two core combinations, and the reconstituted remedy for pascionibus oris from the Lylye of Medicynes on viability of four bacterial pathogens in planktonic culture
| Agent(s) | Dilution | Activity against | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honey | As prepared | − | ++ | − | − |
| 1/5 | − | ++ | − | − | |
| Acetic acid | As prepared | − | − | − | − |
| 1/5 | − | − | − | − | |
| Bile | As prepared | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| 1/5 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| As prepared | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| 1/5 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Breast milk | As prepared | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| 1/5 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Sumac | As prepared | − | ++ | ++ | − |
| 1/5 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| Frankincense | As prepared | − | − | − | − |
| 1/5 | − | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| As prepared | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | |
| Frankincense + sumac | As prepared | − | + | − | − |
| As prepared | − | − | − | − | |
++, no reduction in viable bacteria was observed in any of the three replica cultures; +, at least a 1-log reduction was observed in all three replica cultures; −, complete killing was observed in all three replica cultures.
Comparison of effects of individual agents versus effects of pairs of selected agents from the Lylye of Medicynes on viability of four bacterial pathogens in planktonic culture
| Species and | Activity of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honey | Acetic | Bile | Frankincense + | ||
| Honey | − | − | − | − | − |
| Acetic acid | − | − | − | − | |
| Bile | ++ | ++ | − | ||
| | ++ | ++ | |||
| Frankincense + sumac | − | ||||
| Honey | ++ | − | − | ++ | − |
| Acetic acid | − | − | − | − | |
| Bile | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
| | + | ++ | |||
| Frankincense + sumac | + | ||||
| Honey | − | − | − | ++ | − |
| Acetic acid | − | − | − | − | |
| Bile | ++ | ++ | NA | ||
| | ++ | ++ | |||
| Frankincense + sumac | − | ||||
| Honey | − | − | − | ++ | − |
| Acetic acid | − | − | − | − | |
| Bile | ++ | ++ | ++ | ||
| | ++ | ++ | |||
| Frankincense + sumac | − | ||||
++, no reduction in viable bacteria was observed in any of the three replica cultures; +, at least a 1-log reduction was observed in all three replica cultures; −, complete killing was observed in all three replica cultures; NA, variable results were observed in the three replicates.
The paired agents had potential interference.
The paired agents had potential synergistic activity.
FIG 2Example of an ingredient network. The nodes in yellow are ingredients of a recipe for the treatment of fistula in lacrimali; those in blue are ingredients of a recipe for the treatment of pascionibus oris. Ingredients found in both recipes are colored both yellow and blue. Thicker links join pairs of ingredients that appear in both recipes.
FIG 3Fictitious example of the process for identifying relevant combinations of ingredients via thresholding and community detection. (A) The starting network. (B, C) Apply the thresholding procedure and choose the partitioned network with maximal modularity (q{}, equation 2). (D) Draw a heat map to visualize the strengths of associations between ingredient pairs. Darker pixels indicate a stronger association. For example, in this example, network ingredients 1 and 3 are more strongly connected by their recipe co-occurrences than are ingredients 1 and 2 or ingredients 2 and 3. (E) Identify the most strongly associated group of ingredients and manually search the database for recipes including these combinations.