| Literature DB >> 32046058 |
Jin-Yuan Qian1,2, Cong-Wei Hou1, Xiao-Juan Li1, Zhi-Jiang Jin1.
Abstract
The microvalve is one of the most important components in microfluidics. With decades of development, the microvalve has been widely used in many industries such as life science, chemical engineering, chip, and so forth. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the progress made over the past years about microvalves based on different actuation mechanisms. According to driving sources, plenty of actuation mechanisms are developed and adopted in microvalves, including electricity, magnetism, gas, material and creature, surface acoustic wave, and so on. Although there are currently a variety of microvalves, problems such as leakage, low precision, poor reliability, high energy consumption, and high cost still exist. Problems deserving to be further addressed are suggested, aimed at materials, fabrication methods, controlling performances, flow characteristics, and applications.Entities:
Keywords: actuation mechanism; application; material; microvalves
Year: 2020 PMID: 32046058 PMCID: PMC7074679 DOI: 10.3390/mi11020172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Comparison of the valve operation between normally-closed microvalve (a) and normally-opend microvalves (b). (a) 1 Voltage off, valve fully open; 2 Voltage on, valve starting to close; 3 Voltage on, valve fully closed [30]; (b) Operation mode [32].
Figure 2Fabrication process flow of electrostatic actuated microvalve [32].
Figure 3Two types of schematic diagrams of electrochemical actuated microvalves. (a) A microvalve based on electrochemically actuated SU8 cantilever [37]; (b) A microfluidic valve based on electrochemical (ECM) actuated membrane [39].
Figure 4Typical structures of piezoelectric microvalves: (a) a normally-closed piezoelectric microvalve with flexible stopper [40]; (b) a high pressure piezoelectric actuated microvalve [41]; (c) A piezoelectric microvalve for cryogenic applications [42].
Figure 5SEM photographs of components in piezoelectric microvalve: (a) the microchannel [43]; (b) the silicon valve core and the sealing ring [44]; (c) the hole with serpentine groove patterns [42].
Piezoactuator specifications [41].
| Stroke | Stiffness | Dimensions | Material | Unloaded Resonant Frequency | Block Force Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 µm | 0.5 N·µm−1 | 8 × 10 × 17 mm3 | Stainless steel amplification frame | 1700 Hz | 40 N |
Figure 6Schematic structure of the microvalve [44]: (a) The structure of the microvalve; (b) The diagram of the 3D geometry model of the frame; (c) The cross-sectional view of the valve body.
Comparisons of three types of electrically actuated microvalves.
| Type | Component | Advantage | Disadvantage | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrostatic | Electrodes; | Low energy consumption; | High applied voltage | high pressure gas control; chip; |
| Electrochemical | ECM; valve diaphragm | Precise adjustment | Complex structure; slow operation speed | Lab-on-a-chip; microfluidic system |
| Piezoelectric | Crystal, membrane | Large driving force; rapid response; high tolerance; low cost | High applied voltage; | Drug delivery system; micro-satellites |
Figure 7Schematics of two magnetic microvalves: (a) an externally magnetic ON/OFF microvalve [57]; (b) a magnetic microvalve based on MR fluid [58].
Figure 8Parts of the magnetic-actuated microvalve and polycarbonate fluidic cell [57]: (a) Experimental set-up; (b) Schematics of the system.
Comparison of two types of magnetism driven microvalves.
| Type | Components | Advantages | Disadvantages | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic | Permanent magnet; elastic membrane with soft magnetic material | No energy consumption; simple structure; remote operation | Leakage | Microfluidic device; aeronautic flow control tests |
| Electromagnetic | Electromagnet | High precise control; rapid response | High energy consumption | Lab-on-a-chip |
Figure 9Structure and working principle of microvalve [68]: (a) Open state; (b) Close state.
Three design principles of pneumatic microvalves. The marking LC stands for liquid channel, P is for pressure, indicating the volume where the pressure for opening or closing is applied, cross-hatch is a PDMS layer, diagonal-hatch glass or thermoplastic layers [74].
| No | Design Principle | Reference | Structure | Pressure (kPa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | Close | ||||
| 1 |
| Perdigones, F. et al. [ |
| 1 | 0 |
| Goldowsky, J. et al. [ |
| 0 | 100 | ||
| 2 |
| Baek, J.Y. et al. [ |
| −2 | 40 |
| 3 |
| Samuel, R. et al. [ |
| 0 | 27.6 |
Figure 10Applications of multiple pneumatic microvalves: (a) Integrated microfluidic device containing 100 microvalves [73]; (b) Micro-droplet sorter with two pneumatic microvalves [80].
Figure 11Cross sections of microchannels in pneumatic pressure-driven microvalves [84]: (a) Rectangular cross section; (b) Semicircular cross section.
Summary of microvalves based on pneumatic actuation and thermopneumatic actuation. P: Pneumatic; TP: Thermopneumatic.
| Reference | Year | Type | Material | Medium | Fabrication | Application | Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shinichi et al. [ | 2015 | P | Air flow | Wearable Robotic Systems | Light | ||
| Perdigones et al. [ | 2011 | P | SU-8, gold | Gas | Post-exposure bake (PEB), BETTS process | Flow control, microfluidic circuits design | |
| Satoh et al. [ | 2008 | P | Pyrex glass; silicon | Liquefied gases | Sandblasting, anodic bonding, long EPW etching | Liquefied gas control | High pressure leak tolerance, low pressure loss |
| Jamshaid et al. [ | 2013 | P | PDMS, SU-8 | The continuous flow (oil) | Standard soft lithographic technique | Droplet merging system | No desynchronization problem |
| Chen et al. [ | 2016 | P | PDMS | Oil, water | Microfluidic droplets sorting | ||
| Cong et al. [ | 2016 | P | PDMS | hydrodynamic sample | Multilayer soft lithography | Microchip electrophoresis | Rapid analyte concentration, high sensitivity |
| Schneider et al. [ | 2015 | P | a Si-C (silicon carbide) bottom electrode, aluminum amorphous silicon | Gas | Reactive Ion Etching (RIE), Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE) | Reconfgurable tactile tablet for vision-impaired individuals | |
| Huang et al. [ | 2012 | P | PDMS, PMMA | Hot embossing, irreversible bonding | Droplet generation, micro flow injection analysis | Reversible sealing | |
| Kaminaga et al. [ | 2016 | P | PDMS, SU-8, Si | The flow of the HeLa cell | Inclined lithography method | Conveying large cells | |
| Park et al. [ | 2012 | P | PDMS, hardener, silicon wafers, gold microelectrode | Peel, punch, spincoat | Electrochemical microfluidic devices | ||
| Perdigones et al. [ | 2014 | TP | Flame Retardant 4, copper, gold wire, SU-8, PDMS | Fluid | Post exposure bake (PEB), the wet etching | Portable SU-8 Microfluidic Platforms | Independence of external pressure sources, high integrability, low consumption |
| Huesgen et al. [ | 2010 | TP | Silicon | Fluid flow | Silicon technology | Liquid flow control | Low leakage rate, low energy cost |
| Mongprane et al. [ | 2009 | TP | PDMS, microheater (NiCr), glass | Gas | PDMS spinning, oxygen plasma bonding, electroplated micromasking, thermal evaporation | Microfluidic Chip | Low cost fabrication |
| Aravind et al. [ | 2013 | TP | Phase change liquid, PDMS, glass, silicon | Methanol, Isopropanol | Soft lithography, polymer processing | µTAS or Lab-on-chip | Precise control and manipulate liquid |
| Potkay et al. [ | 2012 | TP | Glass, Si-glass, Au-Si | Fluid | Deep boron etch-stop, shallow isotropic etch, NaOH electrochemical etch, ethylene diamine pyrocatechol (EDP) etch | Electrostatic latching | Low energy consumption |
| Yang et al. [ | 2010 | TP | Polymer, adhesive strip, ring magnet (Nd-Fe-B), silicone | Gas flow | Sputtering, photolithography | No leakage, no extra energy supply |
Figure 12Cross-section view of thermopneumatic microvalve [91].
Microvalves based on material and biology properties. NC, normally closed microvalve; NO, normally open microvalve; B, bistable; SMA, shape memory arroy.
| Reference | Mode | Type | Reversible/Irreversible | Phase Change Material/Creature | Max Pressure (no Leakage) | Time | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al-Aribe et al. [ | NO | Light | Reversible | HEMA-AA hydrogel (pH sensitive) | |||
| Benito-Lopez et al. [ | NC | Light | Reversible | Ionic liquid polymer gels (ionogels) | Open: seconds; | Microfluidic manifolds | |
| Chen et al. [ | NC | Light | Reversible | PNIPAM gel | 1350 psi | Open: 4 s; | Manipulate flow path in micro-total analysis systems |
| Jadhav et al. [ | NC | Light (a near-infrared (NIR) laser) | Reversible | Microgel particles (PNIPAM) | Open: 1~2 s; | Liquid handling in microfluidic devices | |
| Kolari et al. [ | NC | Paraffin | Reversible | Paraffin wax mixed with a suitable concentration of optically absorbing nanographite particles | 2 bar | High pressure, low volume flow silicon-based nanofluidic systems | |
| Yang et al. [ | NO | Paraffin | Reversible | Paraffin wax of low melting point | 35 kPa | Open: 100 s; | Flow gating in portable lab-on-a-chip systems |
| Yoo et al. [ | NO | Paraffin | Reversible | Thermally triggered phase change of the paraffin | Transport of reagents and samples for a lab-on-a-chip | ||
| Feng et al. [ | NC | Paraffin | Reversible | Paraffin wax | 25 kPa (backpressure) | Open: 0.125 s | |
| Baek et al. [ | NC | Paraffin | Reversible | Paraffin wax | 107 kPa | Open: 1~5 s (short intervals); 15-23 s (long intervals) | Wireless sequentially actuated microvalve system |
| Debray et al. [ | NC | Low melting point alloy | Irreversible | Alloy (Bi 44.7%, Pb 22.6%, In 19.1%, Sn 8.3%, Cd 5.3%) with a melting temperature of 47 °C | 200 kPa | Open: 33 s | One-shot micro-valve |
| Shaikh et al. [ | NO | Low melting point alloy | Reversible | A fusible metal alloy (Galinstan: 68.5% Ga, 21.5% In, 10% Sn) that is liquid at room temperature | 138 kPa | Open: 100 ms up to 1 s | Portable lab-on-a-chip devices |
| Barth and Megnin et al. [ | B | SMA | Reversible | SMA (A cold-rolled Ti-49 at.%Ni foil) | Gas (N2): 200 kPa | 200 ms | |
| Gradin et al. [ | NC | SMA | Reversible | NiTi SMA wires | 200 kPa | 50 ms | High gas flow control |
| Zhang et al. [ | NO | SMA | Reversible | SMA wire | 35 kPa | 46 s (switch) | Piezoelectric microfluidic devices for biochemical analysis |
| Nath et al. [ | NC | SMA | Reversible | NiTi SMA | 5 kPa | Micro-valve array | |
| Nagai et al. [ | NO | Creature | Reversible | V. carteri (light-controlled Volvox) | 50 mmH2O | 30 s | Multilayer microfluidic device |
| NC | Creature | Reversible | Cells of Vorticella convallaria | Contraction: 10.5 ± 3.57 s | Compact and multifunctional microsystems | ||
| Liu et al. [ | NC | pH | Reversible | pH-responsive microspheres | 50 kPa | Open: 60 s | Drug discovery, high-throughput screening |
| Dzulkefli et al. [ | NC | Glucose | Reversible | Glucose hydrogel | Drug delivery system (DDS) | ||
| Demir et al. [ | NC | Light (darkness and ultraviolet (UV)) | Reversible | TiO2 layers (wettability conversion) | 980 Pa | ||
| Guo et al. [ | NC | Light (darkness and ultraviolet (UV)) | Reversible | A trimethyl chlorosilane (CTMS) modified TiO2/SiO2 | Minutes | Microscale flow control |
Figure 13Schematic and SEM of photoresponsive hydrogel microvalve [97].
Figure 14Schematic of UV/dark actuated wettability conversion in the surface of the microvalve [119]: (a) Off status and hydrophobic composite structure before UV irradiation; (b) On status and hydrophilic composite structure after UV irradiation.
Figure 15SEM of pH-sensitive microvalve [94].
Figure 16Working principle of the paraffin microvalve [102].
Figure 17Scheme of the cross-section of the one shot microvalve based on low melting point alloy [105]: (a) In the closed position; (b) In the open position.
Figure 18Schematic cross-section of the three-way bistable SMA microvalve [108]: (a) State I; (b) Switching state; (c) State II. (b) Switching from state I to state II is performed by directly heating microbridge m1 with an electrical current.
Comparison of typical high flow microvalves.
| Reference | Type | Medium | Leakage (Relative or Absolute) | Power Consumption | Voltage | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bae et al. [ | ES | Gas | 0 | 140 V | 50 μs | |
| Dankovic et al. [ | ES | Gas | 7.14% (max) | 350 V | ||
| Fazal et al. [ | PE | Gas | 0 | low | 2.5 V | |
| Park et al. [ | PE | Gas | 0 | 0.16 µW | 60 V | 0.7 ms |
| Wiederkehr et al. [ | PE | Gas | 300 V~−200 V | |||
| Huesgen et al. [ | TP | Liquid | 1 μL/min | 1 J (close); | Close: 80 ms to 160 ms; | |
| Jadhav et al. [ | Light | Liquid | 0 | 2.5 W | Open: 1–2 s; | |
| Guo et al. [ | Light | Liquid | 0 | Minutes | ||
| Megnin et al. [ | SMA | Gas/Liquid | <10 μL/min | 60 mW | 20 ms | |
| Gradin et al. [ | SMA | Gas | 50%–70% (<10% possible) | 90 mW | 0.6 V | 50 ms |
ES, electrostatic; PE, piezoelectric; TP, thermopneumatic; SMA, shape memory alloy.
Comparison of different metal materials applied to microvalves.
| Type | Materials | Characteristics | Typical Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low melting point alloy | In-Bi; | T > 62 °C: liquidation | One-shot microvalve (single use); |
| SMA | Ni-Ti | Low temperature: deformation; | Clinical medical field; |
Figure 19Schematic of two microvalves based on microorganism [113,114]: (a) V. carteri [113]; (b) Vorticella [114].
Comparison of different microvalves based on properties of material and creature.
| Type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Light | Long distance control | Long response time |
| pH | No energy consumption | Long response time |
| Glucose | High biocompatibility | Difficult to produce |
| Paraffin | Low cost | High energy consumption |
| Low melting point alloy | Reusable, easy to manufacture | High energy consumption |
| SMA | Shape memory effect | High energy consumption |
| Biology | No pollution | Long response time |
Figure 20A SAW Microvalve in (a) the OFF/normally closed state; (b) the ON/open state [122].