| Literature DB >> 32045451 |
Gizachew Yilak1, Woiynshet Gebretsadik2, Hiwot Tadesse2, Megbaru Debalkie2, Agegnehu Bante2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Improper positioning, attachment, and suckling are constructs for ineffective breastfeeding technique (IBT). IBT results in inadequate intake of breast milk, which leads to poor weight gain, stunting, and declines immunity. Besides, IBT increases the risk of postpartum breast problems. Despite its impact on maternal and child health, breastfeeding technique is not well studied in Ethiopia. Hence, the purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of IBT and associated factors among lactating mothers attending public health facilities of South Ari district, Southern Ethiopia.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32045451 PMCID: PMC7012449 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228863
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Description of variables and measurements for the study in South Ari District, Southern Ethiopia, 2019.
| Variables | Descriptions | Measurement/Category |
|---|---|---|
| Ineffective breastfeeding (IBT) | IBT was a composite variable of the three constructs (positioning, attachment, and suckling) such that lactating women with at least one of the constructs categorized as “poor” were regarded as having IBT [ | Those mothers with IBT were categorized as ‘Yes’ and labeled as “1” and mothers with effective breastfeeding techniques were categorized as ‘No’ and labeled as “0”. |
| Positioning | The technique in which the infant is held in relation to the mother's body. Good positioning: when at least three out of four criteria for infant positioning was fulfilled; average positioning: when any two of the four criteria were correct and poor positioning when only one or none criterion has been fulfilled [ | In the beginning, it was categorized as good, average and poor positioning. Then, to create a dummy variable good and average positioning were merged as ‘good’ and labeled as “0” and ‘poor positioning” was coded as it is and labeled as “1”. |
| Attachment | It indicates whether the infant has enough areola and breast tissue in the mouth. Good attachment: when at least three out of four criterions have been fulfilled. Average attachment: when any two of the four criterions have been fulfilled. Poor attachment: when only one or none out of four criterions have been fulfilled [ | Like that of positioning, first, it was categorized as a good, average and poor attachment. Then, to create a dummy variable good and average attachment were merged as ‘good attachment’ and labeled as “0” and ‘poor attachment” was coded as it is and labeled as “1”. |
| Suckling | Drawing of milk into the mouth from the nipple. Effective suckling: at least two out of three criterions have been fulfilled. Ineffective suckling: only one or none from three criterions has been fulfilled [ | Suckling was coded as ‘effective suckling’, labeled as “0” and ‘ineffective suckling’, labeled as “1”. |
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants attending public health facilities of South Ari district, Southern Ethiopia, 2019 (n= 414).
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| < 20 | 72 | 17.4 |
| 20–25 | 124 | 30.0 |
| 26–30 | 132 | 31.9 |
| > 30 | 86 | 20.7 |
| Ari | 319 | 77.1 |
| Amhara | 52 | 12.6 |
| Wolayita | 31 | 7.5 |
| Other | 12 | 2.8 |
| Protestant | 277 | 66.9 |
| Orthodox | 96 | 23.2 |
| Muslim | 25 | 6.0 |
| Other | 16 | 3.9 |
| No formal education | 252 | 60.8 |
| Primary school | 100 | 24.2 |
| Secondary school and above | 62 | 15.0 |
| Housewife | 286 | 69.1 |
| Government employee | 38 | 9.2 |
| Self-employed | 42 | 10.1 |
| Daily laborer | 33 | 8.0 |
| Other | 15 | 3.6 |
| Married | 357 | 86.3 |
| Single | 20 | 4.8 |
| Divorced | 24 | 5.8 |
| Other | 13 | 3.1 |
| Rural | 304 | 73.4 |
| Urban | 110 | 26.6 |
| < 5 | 300 | 72.5 |
| ≥ 5 | 114 | 27.5 |
aOromo, konso and Gamo Gofa
bCatholic, yewuha miskir
cNGO, student, farmer
dWidowed, Separated
Obstetric characteristics of participants attending public health facilities of South Ari district, southern Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 414).
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parity | Primipara | 137 | 33.1 |
| Multipara | 277 | 66.9 | |
| Ever had stillbirth | Yes | 97 | 23.4 |
| Ever had a neonatal death | Yes | 51 | 12.3 |
| Antenatal care | Yes | 396 | 95.6 |
| Pregnancy status | Planned | 323 | 78.0 |
| Unplanned | 91 | 22.0 | |
| Received counseling during pregnancy | Yes | 245 | 59.2 |
| Place of delivery | Hospital | 123 | 29.7 |
| Health center | 236 | 57.0 | |
| Home | 55 | 13.3 | |
| Mode of delivery | Normal delivery | 383 | 92.5 |
| Cesarean section | 31 | 7.5 | |
| Received postnatal counseling about BFT | Yes | 332 | 80.2 |
| Gestational age at delivery | Term | 359 | 86.7 |
| Preterm | 34 | 8.2 | |
| Post-term | 21 | 5.1 | |
| Birth weight | Low birth weight | 15 | 3.7 |
| Normal | 381 | 92.0 | |
| Macrosomia | 18 | 4.3 | |
| Age of the infant | < 42 days | 164 | 39.6 |
| ≥ 42 days | 250 | 60.4 | |
| Sex of the Infant | Male | 191 | 46.1 |
| Female | 223 | 53.9 | |
| Breast problem | Yes | 59 | 14.3 |
| Giving pre-lacteal feeding | Yes | 26 | 6.3 |
| Initiate complementary feeding | Yes | 137 | 33.1 |
*Breastfeeding techniques
Factors associated with ineffective breastfeeding technique in public health facilities of South Ari district, Southern Ethiopia, 2019 (n = 414).
| Variables | P-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (N, %) | No (N, %) | |||||
| <20 | 53 (73.6) | 19 (26.4) | 1.6 (0.8, 3.1) | 0.195 | 1.1 (0.4, 2.7) | |
| 20-25 | 77 (62.0) | 47 (38) | 0.9 (0.5, 1.6) | 0.784 | 0.9 (0.4, 1.8) | |
| 26 -30 | 78 (59) | 54 (41) | 0.8 (0.5, 1.4) | 0.472 | 0.8 (0.4, 1.6) | |
| >30 years | 55 (64) | 31 (36) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| No formal education | 178 (70.6) | 74 (29.4) | 4.7 (2.6, 8.4) | 0.0001 | 5.0 (2.3, 10.5) | |
| Primary school | 64 (64) | 36 (36) | 3.4 (1.8, 6.7) | 0.0001 | 3.3 (1.4, 7.6) | |
| Secondary & above | 21 (33.8) | 41 (66.2) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Primipara | 96 (70.1) | 41 (29) | 1.5 (0.99, 2.4) | 0.052 | 1.8 (1.0, 3.2) | |
| Multipara | 167 (60.3) | 110 (39.7) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 248 (62.6) | 148 (37.4) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| No | 15 (83.3) | 3 (16.7) | 2.9 (0.85, 10.4) | 2.3 (0.5, 10.6) | ||
| Yes | 134 (54.7) | 111 (45.3) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| No | 129 (76.3) | 40 (23.7) | 2.7(1.7, 4.1) | 2.3 (1.4, 3.9) | ||
| Hospital | 66 (53.6) | 57 (46.4) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Health center | 147 (62.3) | 89 (37.7) | 1.76 (1.14, 2.7) | 0.115 | 1.01 (0.6, 1.7) | |
| Home | 50 (90.9) | 5 (9.1) | 12.4 (2.8, 54.6) | 0.0001 | 4.5 (1.6, 13.1) | |
| Yes | 195 (58.7) | 137 (41.3) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| No | 68 (82.9) | 14 (17.1) | 3.4 (1.8, 6.3) | 0.0001 | 2.5 (1.3, 5.1) | |
| No | 213 (60) | 142 (40) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Yes | 50 (84.7) | 9 (15.3) | 3.7(1.8, 7.8) | 0.001 | 2.5 (1.1, 5.7) | |
| Rural | 203 (66.8) | 101 (33.2) | 1.7 (1.1, 2.6) | 0.023 | 1.7 (0.9, 2.9) | |
| Urban | 60 (54.5) | 50 (45.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| House wife | 194 (67.8) | 92 (32.2) | 1.8 (1.2, 2.8) | 0.007 | 1.3 (0.7, 2.3) | |
| Other | 69 (54) | 59 (46) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Low birth weight | 11 (73.3) | 4 (26.7) | 5.5 (1.2, 24.8) | 0.027 | 2.5 (0.5, 13.2) | |
| Normal | 246 (64.6) | 135 (35.4) | 3.6 (1.3, 9.9) | 0.11 | 2.5 (0.9, 7.3) | |
| Macrosomia | 6 (33.3) | 12(66.7) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Normal | 247 (64.5) | 136 (45.5) | 1.7(0.8, 3.6) | 0.156 | 1.3 (0.5, 3.0) | |
| Cesarean delivery | 16 (51.6) | 15 (48.4) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
* Significant at p < 0.05
aIneffective breastfeeding
bcrude odds ratio
cadjusted odds ratio
dgovernment employee, daily laborer, NGO worker, self-employee