| Literature DB >> 29434650 |
Getahun Tiruye1, Firehiwot Mesfin1, Biftu Geda1, Kasiye Shiferaw1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ineffective breastfeeding technique is one of the factors contributing to mothers practicing non-exclusive breastfeeding. Inappropriate breastfeeding technique is the leading cause of nipple pain in Ethiopia, as in other countries. However, no studies have examined breastfeeding technique and associated factors in eastern Ethiopia. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of assessing breastfeeding technique and associated factors among breastfeeding mothers.Entities:
Keywords: Attachment; Breastfeeding in Eastern Ethiopia; Breastfeeding technique; Positioning; Suckling
Year: 2018 PMID: 29434650 PMCID: PMC5791732 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-018-0147-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Breastfeed J ISSN: 1746-4358 Impact factor: 3.461
Grading system for infant’s body position, mouth attachment and effective suckling during breastfeeding for study conducted in HIs of Harar city, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017
| Correct baby position: | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Baby body should be straight and slightly extended. | ||
| • Baby body close to the mother’s body | ||
| • Whole body supported. | ||
| • Baby facing toward the mother’s breast. | ||
| Criteria for grading baby position in relation to mother: | Grade | Score |
| • None of or only one out of four criteria have been fulfilled. | 0–1 | Poor |
| • Any two of the four criteria have been fulfilled. | 2 | Average |
| • All the four/three criteria for infant positioning is fulfilled by mother. | 3–4 | Good |
| Correctness of attachment: | ||
| • More areola is visible above the baby’s top lip. | ||
| • The baby’s mouth is wide open. | ||
| • The baby’s lower lip is turned outwards. | ||
| • The baby’s chin is touching or almost touching the breast. | ||
| Criteria for grading of correct attachment: | Grade | Score |
| • None of or only one out of four criteria have been fulfilled. | 0–1 | Poor |
| • Any two of the four criteria have been fulfilled. | 2 | Average |
| • Any three or all the four criteria have been fulfilled. | 3–4 | Good |
| Correctness of effective suckling: | ||
| • Slow sucks | ||
| • Deep suckling | ||
| • Sometimes pausing | ||
| Criteria for grading of effective suckling: | Grade | Score |
| • None of or only one of the three criteria have been achieved. | 0–1 | Poor |
| • Any two or the three criteria have been achieved. | 2–3 | Good |
Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants for the study conducted in HIs of Harar City, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017 (n = 412)
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residence | Urban | 261 | 63.3% |
| Rural | 151 | 36.7% | |
| Age | < 20 | 49 | 11.9% |
| 20–25 | 181 | 43.9% | |
| 26–30 | 112 | 27.2% | |
| > 30 | 70 | 17% | |
| Religion | Muslim | 272 | 60.0% |
| Orthodox | 127 | 30.8% | |
| Protestant | 13 | 3.2% | |
| Ethnicity | Oromo | 275 | 66.7% |
| Amhara | 92 | 22.3% | |
| Harari | 16 | 3.9% | |
| Othera | 29 | 7% | |
| Marital status | Married | 395 | 95.9% |
| Single | 9 | 2.2% | |
| Otherb | 8 | 1.9% | |
| Respondents’ educational status | No formal education | 157 | 38.1% |
| Primary school | 124 | 30.1% | |
| Secondary school & above | 131 | 31.8% | |
| Occupation | House wife | 316 | 76.7% |
| Government employee | 44 | 10.7% | |
| Non-government | 9 | 2.2% | |
| Private employee | 15 | 3.6% | |
| Daily laborer | 11 | 2.7% | |
| Otherc | 17 | 4.1% | |
| Number of family members | < 5 | 338 | 82.0% |
| ≥ 5 | 74 | 18.0% | |
Other aGurage, Tigre, Somali and Wolaita. Other bwidowed, divorced, other cmerchant, student and farmer and HIs Health Institutions
Obstetric and infant characteristics of participants for the study conducted in HIs of Harar City, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017 (n = 412)
| Variables | Frequency | Percentages | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parity | Primipara | 158 | 38.3 |
| Multipara | 254 | 61.7 | |
| Antenatal care | Yes | 349 | 84.7 |
| No | 63 | 15.3 | |
| Antenatal Counseling about BFT | Yes | 149 | 42.7 |
| No | 200 | 57.3 | |
| Place of delivery | Hospital | 360 | 87.4 |
| Health center | 43 | 10.4 | |
| Home | 9 | 2.2 | |
| Mode of delivery | Normal delivery | 341 | 82.8 |
| C/S | 71 | 17.2 | |
| Immediate BFT counseling after delivery | Yes | 144 | 35 |
| No | 268 | 65 | |
| Postnatal care | Yes | 405 | 98.3 |
| No | 7 | 1.7 | |
| Frequency of postnatal care visit | 1 | 373 | 92.1 |
| ≥ 2 | 32 | 7.9 | |
| GA of the infant | Preterm | 46 | 11.2 |
| Term | 352 | 85.4 | |
| Post term | 14 | 3.4 | |
| Birth weight | LBW | 37 | 9.0 |
| NBW | 335 | 81.3 | |
| Macrosomia | 31 | 7.7 | |
| Age of the infant | < 42 days | 218 | 52.9 |
| ≥42 days | 181 | 43.9 | |
| Infant’s sex | Male | 202 | 49 |
| Female | 210 | 51 | |
GA Gestational Age, BFT Breastfeeding Technique, LBW Low Birth Weight, NBW Normal Birth Weight and HIs Health Institutions
Fig. 1Proportion of positioning, attachment and suckling of infants during feeding in Harar City, Ethiopia, 2017
Fig. 2Effective breastfeeding technique based on sociodemographic, maternal and obstetric factors in Harar City, Ethiopia, 2017. BFE*: Breastfeeding experience, MD**: Mode of delivery, SF***: Supplementary feeding, C/S: Cesarean Section, BFT: Breastfeeding technique and HIs: Health Institutions
Bivariate and multivariable analysis of factors associated with effective BFT among breastfeeding mothers in HIs of Harar City, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017 (n = 412)
| Variables | Practice | Crude odd ratio (95%CI) | Adjusted odd ratio (95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effective Breastfeeding Technique (%) | Ineffective Breastfeeding Technique (%) | ||||
| Age of mother | < 19 | 28.6 | 71.4 | 1 | 1 |
| 20–25 | 36.5 | 63.5 | 1.4 (.72, 2.8) | 0.7 (0.3, 1.6) | |
| 26–30 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 3.3 (1.6, 6.9) | 1.3 (0.5, 3) | |
| > 30 | 50 | 50 | 2.5 (1.2, 5.4) | 0.9 (0.4, 2.7) | |
| Educational status | No formal education | 36.3 | 63.7 | 1 | 1 |
| Primary | 38.7 | 61.3 | 1.1 (0.7, 1.8) | 1.3 (0.8, 2.2) | |
| 2ndary & above | 56.5 | 43.5 | 2.3 (1.4, 3.7) * | 2.3 (1.1, 3.9) * | |
| Occupation | HWa | 40.2 | 59.8 | 1 | 1 |
| Working | 54.2 | 44.8 | 1.7 (1.1, 2.8) | 0.8 (0.5, 1.5) | |
| Previous information about BFT | Yes | 55.5 | 44.5 | 2.9 (1.9, 4.3) * | 1.9 (1.1, 3) * |
| No | 29.9 | 70.1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Breastfeeding experience | Yes | 50.6 | 49.4 | 2.1 (1.4, 3.2) * | 3.3 (1.1, 10.7) * |
| No | 32.7 | 67.3 | 1 | 1 | |
| Breast problem | Yes | 14.3 | 85.7 | 1 | 1 |
| No | 46.2 | 53.8 | 5.1 (1.9, 13.5) ** | 4.0 (1.4, 10.9) ** | |
| Parity | Primipara | 32.9 | 67.1 | 1 | 1 |
| Multi para | 50 | 50 | 2 (1.3, 3) | 0.6 (0.2, 1.9) | |
| Antenatal care follow up | yes | 45 | 55 | 1.5 (0.8, 2.6) | 1.3 (0.6, 2.4) |
| No | 34.9 | 65.1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Immediate counseling about BFT | Yes | 59 | 41 | 2.6 (1.8, 4)* | 1.7 (1.1, 2.8)* |
| No | 35.1 | 64.9 | 1 | 1 | |
| Frequency of postnatal care visit | 1 | 41 | 59 | 1 | 1 |
| ≥ 2 | 81.3 | 18.7 | 6.2 (2.5, 15.5)*** | 5.9 (2.1, 15.9)*** | |
*, ** and ***: P value; ≤ 0.05, ≤ 0.01 and ≤0.001 both in the Crude and adjusted odds ratio respectively
HW Housewife, BFT Breastfeeding Technique and HIs Health Institutions