| Literature DB >> 32045217 |
Stefano Fornasaro1, Fatima Alsamad2, Monica Baia3, Luís A E Batista de Carvalho4, Claudia Beleites5, Hugh J Byrne6, Alessandro Chiadò7, Mihaela Chis3, Malama Chisanga8, Amuthachelvi Daniel9, Jakub Dybas10, Gauthier Eppe11, Guillaume Falgayrac12, Karen Faulds13, Hrvoje Gebavi14, Fabrizio Giorgis7, Royston Goodacre15, Duncan Graham13, Pietro La Manna16, Stacey Laing13, Lucio Litti17, Fiona M Lyng9, Kamilla Malek10, Cedric Malherbe11, Maria P M Marques4,18, Moreno Meneghetti17, Elisa Mitri1, Vlasta Mohaček-Grošev14, Carlo Morasso19, Howbeer Muhamadali15, Pellegrino Musto16, Chiara Novara7, Marianna Pannico16, Guillaume Penel12, Olivier Piot2, Tomas Rindzevicius20, Elena A Rusu3, Michael S Schmidt21, Valter Sergo1,22, Ganesh D Sockalingum2, Valérie Untereiner2, Renzo Vanna19, Ewelina Wiercigroch10, Alois Bonifacio1.
Abstract
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is a powerful and sensitive technique for the detection of fingerprint signals of molecules and for the investigation of a series of surface chemical reactions. Many studies introduced quantitative applications of SERS in various fields, and several SERS methods have been implemented for each specific application, ranging in performance characteristics, analytes used, instruments, and analytical matrices. In general, very few methods have been validated according to international guidelines. As a consequence, the application of SERS in highly regulated environments is still considered risky, and the perception of a poorly reproducible and insufficiently robust analytical technique has persistently retarded its routine implementation. Collaborative trials are a type of interlaboratory study (ILS) frequently performed to ascertain the quality of a single analytical method. The idea of an ILS of quantification with SERS arose within the framework of Working Group 1 (WG1) of the EU COST Action BM1401 Raman4Clinics in an effort to overcome the problematic perception of quantitative SERS methods. Here, we report the first interlaboratory SERS study ever conducted, involving 15 laboratories and 44 researchers. In this study, we tried to define a methodology to assess the reproducibility and trueness of a quantitative SERS method and to compare different methods. In our opinion, this is a first important step toward a "standardization" process of SERS protocols, not proposed by a single laboratory but by a larger community.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32045217 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Chem ISSN: 0003-2700 Impact factor: 6.986