Adrian Diaz1,2, Kevin B Ricci1,2, Amy P Rushing1,2, Angela M Ingraham3, Vijaya T Daniel4, Anghela Z Paredes1,2, Holly E Baselice1,2, Wendelyn M Oslock2,5, Victor Heh1,2, Scott A Strassels1,2, Heena P Santry6,7. 1. Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. 2. Center for Surgical Health Assessment, Research and Policy (SHARP), Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. 5. Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Heena.Santry@osumc.edu. 7. Center for Surgical Health Assessment, Research and Policy (SHARP), Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Heena.Santry@osumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) no longer mandates urgent surgical evaluation raising the question of the role of operating room (OR) access on SBO outcomes. METHODS: Data from our 2015 survey on emergency general surgery (EGS) practices, including queries on OR availability and surgical staffing, were anonymously linked to adult SBO patient data from 17 Statewide Inpatient Databases (SIDs). Univariate and multivariable associations between OR access and timing of operation, complications, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality were measured. RESULTS: Of 32,422 SBO patients, 83% were treated non-operatively. Operative patients were older (median 66 vs 65 years), had more comorbidities (53% vs 46% with ≥ 3), and experienced more systemic complications (36% vs 23%), higher mortality (2.8% vs 1.4%), and longer LOS (median 10 vs 4 days). Patients had lower odds of operation if treated at hospitals lacking processes to tier urgent cases (aOR 0.90, 95% CI [0.83-0.99]) and defer elective cases (aOR 0.87 [0.80-0.94]). Patients had higher odds of operation if treated at hospitals with surgeons sometimes (aOR 1.14 [1.04-1.26]) or rarely/never (aOR 1.16 [1.06-1.26]) covering EGS at more than one location compared to always. Odds of systemic complication (OR 2.0 [1.6-2.4]), operative complication (OR 1.5 [1.2-1.8]), and mortality were increased for very late versus early operation (OR 2.6 [1.7-4.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Although few patients with SBO require emergency surgery, we identified EGS structures and processes that are important for providing timely and appropriate intervention for patients whose SBO remains unresolved and requires surgery.
BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) no longer mandates urgent surgical evaluation raising the question of the role of operating room (OR) access on SBO outcomes. METHODS: Data from our 2015 survey on emergency general surgery (EGS) practices, including queries on OR availability and surgical staffing, were anonymously linked to adult SBO patient data from 17 Statewide Inpatient Databases (SIDs). Univariate and multivariable associations between OR access and timing of operation, complications, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality were measured. RESULTS: Of 32,422 SBO patients, 83% were treated non-operatively. Operative patients were older (median 66 vs 65 years), had more comorbidities (53% vs 46% with ≥ 3), and experienced more systemic complications (36% vs 23%), higher mortality (2.8% vs 1.4%), and longer LOS (median 10 vs 4 days). Patients had lower odds of operation if treated at hospitals lacking processes to tier urgent cases (aOR 0.90, 95% CI [0.83-0.99]) and defer elective cases (aOR 0.87 [0.80-0.94]). Patients had higher odds of operation if treated at hospitals with surgeons sometimes (aOR 1.14 [1.04-1.26]) or rarely/never (aOR 1.16 [1.06-1.26]) covering EGS at more than one location compared to always. Odds of systemic complication (OR 2.0 [1.6-2.4]), operative complication (OR 1.5 [1.2-1.8]), and mortality were increased for very late versus early operation (OR 2.6 [1.7-4.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Although few patients with SBO require emergency surgery, we identified EGS structures and processes that are important for providing timely and appropriate intervention for patients whose SBO remains unresolved and requires surgery.
Entities:
Keywords:
Emergency general surgery; mortality; small bowel obstruction; survey; workforce
Authors: Vijaya T Daniel; Angela M Ingraham; Jasmine A Khubchandani; Didem Ayturk; Catarina I Kiefe; Heena P Santry Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2018-08-06
Authors: Martin D Zielinski; Nadeem N Haddad; Daniel C Cullinane; Kenji Inaba; Dante D Yeh; Salina Wydo; David Turay; Andrea Pakula; Therese M Duane; Jill Watras; Kenneth A Widom; John Cull; Carlos J Rodriguez; Eric A Toschlog; Valerie G Sams; Joshua P Hazelton; John Christopher Graybill; Ruby Skinner; Ji-Ming Yune Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Kevin B Ricci; Amy P Rushing; Angela M Ingraham; Vijaya T Daniel; Anghela Z Paredes; Adrian Diaz; Victor K Heh; Holly E Baselice; Wendelyn M Oslock; Scott A Strassels; Heena P Santry Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Heena P Santry; Scott A Strassels; Angela M Ingraham; Wendelyn M Oslock; Kevin B Ricci; Anghela Z Paredes; Victor K Heh; Holly E Baselice; Amy P Rushing; Adrian Diaz; Vijaya T Daniel; M Didem Ayturk; Catarina I Kiefe Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 4.615