HYPOTHESIS: The overall supply of general surgeons per 100 000 population has declined in the past 2 decades, and small and isolated rural areas of the United States continue to have relatively fewer general surgeons per 100 000 population than urban areas. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal analysis. SETTING: Clinically active general surgeons in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: The American Medical Association's Physician Masterfiles from 1981, 1991, 2001, and 2005 were used to identify all clinically active general surgeons in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of general surgeons per 100 000 population and the age, sex, and locale of these surgeons. RESULTS: General surgeon to population ratios declined steadily across the study period, from 7.68 per 100 000 in 1981 to 5.69 per 100 000 in 2005. The overall urban ratio dropped from 8.04 to 5.85 (-27.24%) across the study period, and the overall rural ratio dropped from 6.36 to 5.02 (-21.07%). The average age of rural surgeons increased compared with their urban counterparts, and women were disproportionately concentrated in urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: The overall number of general surgeons per 100 000 population has declined by 25.91% during the past 25 years. The decline has been most marked in urban areas. However, more remote rural areas continue to have significantly fewer general surgeons per 100 000 population. These findings have implications for training, recruiting, and retaining general surgeons.
HYPOTHESIS: The overall supply of general surgeons per 100 000 population has declined in the past 2 decades, and small and isolated rural areas of the United States continue to have relatively fewer general surgeons per 100 000 population than urban areas. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal analysis. SETTING: Clinically active general surgeons in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: The American Medical Association's Physician Masterfiles from 1981, 1991, 2001, and 2005 were used to identify all clinically active general surgeons in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of general surgeons per 100 000 population and the age, sex, and locale of these surgeons. RESULTS: General surgeon to population ratios declined steadily across the study period, from 7.68 per 100 000 in 1981 to 5.69 per 100 000 in 2005. The overall urban ratio dropped from 8.04 to 5.85 (-27.24%) across the study period, and the overall rural ratio dropped from 6.36 to 5.02 (-21.07%). The average age of rural surgeons increased compared with their urban counterparts, and women were disproportionately concentrated in urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: The overall number of general surgeons per 100 000 population has declined by 25.91% during the past 25 years. The decline has been most marked in urban areas. However, more remote rural areas continue to have significantly fewer general surgeons per 100 000 population. These findings have implications for training, recruiting, and retaining general surgeons.
Authors: James C Rosser; Xinwei Liu; Charles Jacobs; Katherine Mia Choi; Maarten B Jalink; Henk O Ten Cate Hoedemaker Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: J-P Ritz; J Gröne; U Hopt; H D Saeger; J R Siewert; B Vollmar; J C Lauscher; K S Lehmann; H J Buhr Journal: Chirurg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Lars E Hagander; Christopher D Hughes; Katherine Nash; Karan Ganjawalla; Allison Linden; Yolanda Martins; Kathleen M Casey; John G Meara Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Richard Smith; Steven C Stain; David W McFadden; Samuel R G Finlayson; Daniel B Jones; K Marie Reid-Lombardo Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-04-19 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Marquita R Decker; Christopher M Dodgion; Alvin C Kwok; Yue-Yung Hu; Jeff A Havlena; Wei Jiang; Stuart R Lipsitz; K Craig Kent; Caprice C Greenberg Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 6.113