Literature DB >> 32043178

A Weak and Semi-supervised Segmentation Method for Prostate Cancer in TRUS Images.

Seokmin Han1, Sung Il Hwang2, Hak Jong Lee3,4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to exploit a weak and semi-supervised deep learning framework to segment prostate cancer in TRUS images, alleviating the time-consuming work of radiologists to draw the boundary of the lesions and training the neural network on the data that do not have complete annotations. A histologic-proven benchmarking dataset of 102 case images was built and 22 images were randomly selected for evaluation. Some portion of the training images were strong supervised, annotated pixel by pixel. Using the strong supervised images, a deep learning neural network was trained. The rest of the training images with only weak supervision, which is just the location of the lesion, were fed to the trained network to produce the intermediate pixelwise labels for the weak supervised images. Then, we retrained the neural network on the all training images with the original labels and the intermediate labels and fed the training images to the retrained network to produce the refined labels. Comparing the distance of the center of mass of the refined labels and the intermediate labels to the weak supervision location, the closer one replaced the previous label, which could be considered as the label updates. After the label updates, test set images were fed to the retrained network for evaluation. The proposed method shows better result with weak and semi-supervised data than the method using only small portion of strong supervised data, although the improvement may not be as much as when the fully strong supervised dataset is used. In terms of mean intersection over union (mIoU), the proposed method reached about 0.6 when the ratio of the strong supervised data was 40%, about 2% decreased performance compared to that of 100% strong supervised case. The proposed method seems to be able to help to alleviate the time-consuming work of radiologists to draw the boundary of the lesions, and to train the neural network on the data that do not have complete annotations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Prostate cancer; Segmentation; TRUS; Weak and semi-supervision

Year:  2020        PMID: 32043178      PMCID: PMC7522148          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00323-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  21 in total

Review 1.  Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Melissa M Center; Carol DeSantis; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  A deep learning approach for real time prostate segmentation in freehand ultrasound guided biopsy.

Authors:  Emran Mohammad Abu Anas; Parvin Mousavi; Purang Abolmaesumi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Joint Weakly and Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Localization and Classification of Masses in Breast Ultrasound Images.

Authors: 
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images.

Authors:  Seokmin Han; Ho-Kyung Kang; Ja-Yeon Jeong; Moon-Ho Park; Wonsik Kim; Won-Chul Bang; Yeong-Kyeong Seong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.

Authors:  G Aus; C C Abbou; M Bolla; A Heidenreich; H-P Schmid; H van Poppel; J Wolff; F Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Automated diagnosis of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI based on multimodal convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Minh Hung Le; Jingyu Chen; Liang Wang; Zhiwei Wang; Wenyu Liu; Kwang-Ting Tim Cheng; Xin Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Predictive value of PSA velocity over early clinical and pathological parameters in patients with localized prostate cancer who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Carlos A L Martinez; Marcos Dall'Oglio; Luciano Nesrallah; Kátia M Leite; Valdemar Ortiz; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Anton Stangelberger; Matthias Waldert; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 9.  Prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  James Eastham
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-06-20

10.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis with Deep Learning Architecture: Applications to Breast Lesions in US Images and Pulmonary Nodules in CT Scans.

Authors:  Jie-Zhi Cheng; Dong Ni; Yi-Hong Chou; Jing Qin; Chui-Mei Tiu; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Dinggang Shen; Chung-Ming Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Combining weakly and strongly supervised learning improves strong supervision in Gleason pattern classification.

Authors:  Sebastian Otálora; Niccolò Marini; Henning Müller; Manfredo Atzori
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 1.930

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.