| Literature DB >> 32042832 |
Mortaza Taheri-Anganeh1, Seyyed Hossein Khatami2, Zeinab Jamali3, Ahmad Movahedpour1,4, Younes Ghasemi5,6, Amir Savardashtaki1,6, Zohreh Mostafavi-Pour2,7.
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a challenging infectious agent worldwide. The ever growing antibiotic resistance has made the researchers to look for new anti-staphylococcal agents. Autolysins are staphylococcal enzymes that lyse bacterial cell wall for cell division. Autolysins can be used as novel enzybiotics (enzymes have antibiotic effects) for staphylococcal infections. LytU is a newly explored autolysin. SH3b is a potent cell wall binding domain that can be fused to lytic enzymes to increase their activity. The aim of this study was to design a novel and efficient fusion enzybiotic that could lyse staphylococcal cell wall peptidoglycan by disrupting the bacteria. LytU-SH3b fusion construct was synthesized and LytU was amplified through the construct, using overhang PCR. The fusion and native forms that had his-tag were synthesized by recombinant technology in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) strain and purified utilizing Ni-NTA agarose beads. LytU and LytU-SH3b activity and potency were assessed using plate lysis assay, turbidity reduction assay and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) tests. All these tests showed that LytU-SH3b has more activity and potency than LytU. LytU-SH3b has MIC 421 fold lesser than LytU. Finally, LytU-SH3b is a novel and efficient recombinant enzybiotic that can lyse MRSA as an alternative to chemical small molecule antibiotics.Entities:
Keywords: Autolysin; Enzybiotics; LytU; SH3b; Staphylococcus aureus
Year: 2019 PMID: 32042832 PMCID: PMC6995334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Res Commun ISSN: 2322-181X
Figure 1SDS-PAGE and Western blotting analysis of LytU and LytU-SH3b. A: line 1 protein size marker, Line 2 and 3, uninduced and induced expression by IPTG, line 4 prewash, line 5 and 6 consecutive washes, line 7 final elution of LytU (26 kDa). B: line 1 protein size marker, Line 2 and 3, uninduced and induced expression by IPTG, line 4 prewash, line 5 and 6 consecutive washes, line 7 final elution of LytU-SH3b (34kDa). C: line 1 LytU, line 2 LytU-SH3b.
Disc diffusion diameter for various concentrations of LytU and LytU-SH3b
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Disc diffusion diameter (mm) | LytU | 18.2±2 | 3.7±1 | 1.8±0.5 |
| LytU-SH3b | 25.2±3 | 7.8±1.5 | 4.0±0.3 | |
Figure 2Turbidity reduction assay
Comparison of LytU and LytU-SH3b MICs and some small molecule antibiotics
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| μg mL−1 | NM | ||
| LytU | 97±4 | 4040±166.67 | - |
| LytU-SH3b | 0.23±0.08 | 7.19±2.5 | - |
| Rifampin | 0.02 | 24 | [27] |
| Clindamycin | 0.1 | 240 | [28] |
| Vancomycin | 1.4 | 970 | [29] |
| Daptomycin | 25 | 15000 | [27] |