Literature DB >> 32042667

A novel, adaptable, radiographically opaque, multi-plane continuous filament marker for optimizing tissue identification, radiation planning, and radiographic follow-up.

Sunny Mitchell1, Henry Lee2, Beth Baughman DuPree3, David C Beyer4, Michael Ulissey5, Stephen R Grobmyer6, Jennifer Gass7, Susan Boolbol8, Toni Storm-Dickerson9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer treatment, marking the tumor bed is an important aspect of the surgical component of therapy. Clear delineation of the tumor bed allows radiation oncologists a defined target for planning and delivering postoperative radiation therapy (XRT). Tumor bed marking also allows radiographic follow-up of the tumor bed on subsequent breast imaging. The aim of this assessment is to evaluate the ease and feasibility of utilizing a tumor bed filament marker (VeraFormÒ, Videra Surgical inc., USA) as a marker in post-operative benign surgical sites and malignant breast surgical tumor beds in breast cancer surgery.
METHODS: The filament marker is a novel radiopaque surgical filament that in lieu of clips and other markers is implanted in the surgical tumor bed during breast surgery. Following development of the filament marker, the researchers used breast phantoms and radiographic images to develop a series of geometric patterns of placement options that optimize comprehensive multi-plane radiographic interpretation of the exact tumor bed or surgical margin. Three breast surgeons at 3 separate institutions then used this filament as a continuous multi-plane marker in 20 patients during breast conservation surgery. In these patients, the filament marker was thus used to mark the tumor bed (breast cancer surgery) or surgical site (benign breast disease) instead of the more traditional devices such as clips or other metallic open framework devices. We then assessed 2 important factors related to this device; (I) the ease, feasibility, and accuracy of in vivo placement with oncoplastic and non-oncoplastic breast conservation surgery techniques; (II) the radiographic footprint this device left on standard imaging protocols of post-operative mammogram (MMG), computed tomography (CT) scan, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations, and ultrasounds (USs) for both routine follow-up imaging and for standard radiation planning.
RESULTS: There were no adverse events reported with the use of this device. The cases were then reviewed by a multidisciplinary team that included the original surgeon, a breast radiologist, and radiation oncologist. Their unanimous evaluation was that the filament marker clearly delineated all sides and planes of the tumor bed (cancer surgery) or surgical site (benign disease). Regardless of surgical technique utilized, this information provided precise 3D guidance for radiation planning and delivery as well as radiographic follow-up. The surgeons involved reported that delineating the bed with the filament marker was a quick and easy procedure and did not interfere with performing the planned surgical technique. Radiologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists found that the filament marker was not only radiographically opaque on CT and MMG, but also caused no significant artifact on CT, MRI, US, or MMG.
CONCLUSIONS: The continuous multi-plane filament marker is a new device that fulfills the heretofore unmet need for safe and improved tumor bed and tissue site marking. It is an easy to place, non-palpable continuous multi-plane radiographic opaque tissue marker that seems to better delineate the tumor bed, regardless of type of breast surgery performed, while providing a more accurate 3D image for radiation planning and radiographic follow-up on MMG MRI, CT and US. 2019 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; breast surgery; filament marker; oncoplastic; radiation planning; tumor bed marker

Year:  2019        PMID: 32042667      PMCID: PMC6989892          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2019.10.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  35 in total

1.  A study on the displacements of the clips in surgical cavity for external-beam partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery based on 4DCT.

Authors:  Suzhen Wang; Jianbin Li; Wei Wang; Yingjie Zhang; Fengxing Li; Tingyong Fan; Dongping Shang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 2.  Tumor bed delineation for external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Jonathan Yang; Randa Tao; Paula H M Elkhuizen; Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij; Guang Li; Simon N Powell
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Optimization of surgical clip placement for breast-conservation therapy.

Authors:  Aneesh Pirlamarla; Adam Ferro; Ning J Yue; Bruce G Haffty; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-09-02

4.  Practical use of the extended no action level (eNAL) correction protocol for breast cancer patients with implanted surgical clips.

Authors:  Joan Penninkhof; Sandra Quint; Margreet Baaijens; Ben Heijmen; Maarten Dirkx
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Single incision for quadrantectomy and laparoscopic axillary lymph node dissection in the treatment of early breast cancer: initial experience of 5 cases.

Authors:  Shuo-Dong Wu; Ying Fan; Jing Kong; Hong Yu
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.878

6.  Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery.

Authors:  Krishna B Clough; Gabriel J Kaufman; Claude Nos; Ines Buccimazza; Isabelle M Sarfati
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Improvement of consistency in delineating breast lumpectomy cavity using surgical clips.

Authors:  Siavash Atrchian; Pejman Sadeghi; Wladyslawa Cwajna; Lucy Helyer; Dorianne Rheaume; Maureen Nolan; Parisa Sadeghi; James Robar
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Tumour bed delineation for partial breast/breast boost radiotherapy: what is the optimal number of implanted markers?

Authors:  Anna Nm Kirby; Rajesh Jena; Emma J Harris; Phil M Evans; Clare Crowley; Deborah L Gregory; Charlotte E Coles
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Setup Error and Effectiveness of Weekly Image-Guided Radiation Therapy of TomoDirect for Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Mi Joo Chung; Guk Jin Lee; Young Jin Suh; Hyo Chun Lee; Sea-Won Lee; Songmi Jeong; Jeong Won Lee; Sung Hwan Kim; Dae Gyu Kang; Jong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Target position reproducibility in left-breast irradiation with deep inspiration breath-hold using multiple optical surface control points.

Authors:  Aurora Fassi; Giovanni B Ivaldi; Paola Tabarelli de Fatis; Marco Liotta; Ilaria Meaglia; Patrizia Porcu; Lea Regolo; Marco Riboldi; Guido Baroni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.