Literature DB >> 32041711

Preclinical Antimalarial Combination Study of M5717, a Plasmodium falciparum Elongation Factor 2 Inhibitor, and Pyronaridine, a Hemozoin Formation Inhibitor.

Matthias Rottmann1,2, Brian Jonat3, Christin Gumpp1,2, Satish K Dhingra4, Marla J Giddins4, Xiaoyan Yin5, Lassina Badolo6, Beatrice Greco7, David A Fidock4,8, Claude Oeuvray7, Thomas Spangenberg9.   

Abstract

Antimalarial drug resistance in the Plasmodium falciparum parasite poses a constant challenge for drug development. To mitigate this risk, new antimalarial medicines should be developed as fixed-dose combinations. Assessing the pharmacodynamic interactions of potential antimalarial drug combination partners during early phases of development is essential in developing the targeted parasitological and clinical profile of the final drug product. Here, we have studied the combination of M5717, a P. falciparum translation elongation factor 2 inhibitor, and pyronaridine, an inhibitor of hemozoin formation. Our test cascade consisted of in vitro isobolograms as well as in vivo studies in the P. falciparum severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mouse model. We also analyzed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, including genomic sequencing of recrudescent parasites. We observed no pharmacokinetic interactions with the combination of M5717 and pyronaridine. M5717 did not negatively impact the rate of kill of the faster-acting pyronaridine, and the latter was able to suppress the selection of M5717-resistant mutants, as well as significantly delay the recrudescence of parasites both with suboptimal and optimal dosing regimens.
Copyright © 2020 Rottmann et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  M5717; Plasmodium falciparum; SCID mouse; drug combination; isobologram; malaria; pyronaridine; resistant mutant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32041711      PMCID: PMC7179297          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02181-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


INTRODUCTION

Antimalarial drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum has led to the demise of multiple first-line treatments, including chloroquine, proguanil, pyrimethamine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, mefloquine, and more recently the artemisinin-based combination therapy dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, which was recently reported to produce only a 50% adequate clinical and parasitological response in sites across the Greater Mekong subregion (1–3). To mitigate the risk of resistance, new antimalarial drugs should be developed as fixed-dose combinations. The rationale for combination therapy is that any parasite resistant to one component should be eliminated by the other, provided that both have distinct modes of action. This strategy is expected to significantly reduce the emergence of resistance (4). However, other factors that influence the emergence of drug resistance must be taken into account, including drug exposure, drug half-life, effects of the drug on other parasite life-cycle stages such as gametocytogenesis and gametocyte viability, clinical parasite reduction ratio, and drug dosage (5, 6). Recently, a quinoline-4-carboxamide antiplasmodial series was optimized to deliver lead molecules with low nanomolar in vitro potency and excellent oral efficacy in the Plasmodium berghei malaria mouse model with ED90 values below 1 mg/kg when dosed orally for 4 days (7, 8). The favorable efficacy, potency, selectivity, drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic (DMPK) properties, coupled with a novel mechanism of action, namely inhibition of P. falciparum translation elongation factor 2 (PfeEF2), led to the progression of M5717 (also known as DDD107498) from preclinical to clinical development (Fig. 1) (7, 8). The mean half-life (t1/2) ranged from 155 h to 193 h across doses in human volunteers. From a parasitological standpoint, M5717 is potent across the parasite life cycle. Due to its mode of action, the anti-parasitological activity is characterized by a rapid arrest of parasite growth with a delayed clearance of parasites from circulation, while also acting on liver stages and gametocytes. This multistage activity provides additional benefits for treatment, such as prophylaxis or transmission-blocking potential (9). Not surprisingly, at clinically relevant parasite inoculum levels, M5717-resistant parasites can be selected in vitro and lead to various degrees of susceptibility, highlighting the need for a well-selected partner drug during the combination phases (7).
FIG 1

Chemical structures of M5717 and pyronaridine.

Chemical structures of M5717 and pyronaridine. With this in mind, we selected pyronaridine (10–15), a benzonaphthyridine derivative discovered in China in the late 1970s, for partnering with M5717. Pyronaridine fulfilled three criteria that seemed to provide reasonable prerequisites for the combination strategy (Fig. 1): (i) matching half-lives to avoid periods where only one drug achieves therapeutic levels, where pyronaridine is a long-lasting drug with a t1/2 of 241 h at 400 mg in healthy volunteers (16); (ii) complementary modes of action in regard to the rate of killing, where pyronaridine is a fast-acting (chloroquine-like) drug that has the demonstrated ability to inhibit β-hematin formation in vitro (17, 18); and (iii) a lack of resistance reported to date in P. falciparum (19). Here, we describe the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the combination of M5717 and pyronaridine, both in vitro through asexual blood-stage P. falciparum parasites as well as in vivo by means of the well-established P. falciparum SCID mouse model (20). The objective of the studies was to evaluate and describe the parasitological behavior and pharmacokinetic parameters of the two compounds when used in combination.

RESULTS

In vitro drug interactions.

We observed no interaction between M5717 and pyronaridine with our in vitro isobologram experiments with three different assay durations (Table 1; see Materials and Methods). Experimental half maximal effective concentration (EC50) values (M5717, 0.3 nM; pyronaridine, 3.5 nM; atovaquone, 0.4 nM; proguanil, 5.5 μM; [3H]hypoxanthine incorporation, 72 h, NF54 strain) of P. falciparum were in close agreement with the literature (21), and we observed the sum of the fractional 50% inhibitory concentration (ΣFIC50) values in the range of 1.3 to 1.7 from three independent experiments for this combination conducted for 48 and 72 h. These results suggested that the interactions between M5717 and pyronaridine were not detrimental, but rather were additive under these test conditions. Control experiments with the previously described synergistic drug combination of atovaquone + proguanil showed the expected level of synergy, with ΣFIC50 values in the range of 0.2 to 0.4 across 48 h and 72 h assays (Table 1) (22).
TABLE 1

In vitro drug combination assays for M5717+pyronaridine and atovaquone+proguanil in the NF54 strain,

Drug partnersΣFIC50 at 48 hΣFIC50 at 72 hInteraction at 72 hCombination ratioDrug partnersΣFIC50 at 48 hΣFIC50 at 72 hInteraction at 72 h
M5717 + PYRO1.7 ± 0.121.4 ± 0.12Nondetrimental interaction1 + 3ATO + PRO0.4 ± 0.040.3 ± 0.08Synergistic
M5717 + PYRO1.5 ± 0.381.4 ± 0.26Nondetrimental interaction1 + 1ATO + PRO0.3 ± 0.060.3 ± 0.05Synergistic
M5717 + PYRO1.3 ± 0.171.4 ± 017Nondetrimental interaction3 + 1ATO + PRO0.3 ± 0.030.2 ± 0.05Synergistic

ATO, atovaquone; PRO, proguanil; PYRO, pyronaridine.

ΣFIC50 (fractional inhibitory concentrations) indicate the following: synergism at ΣFIC50 ≤0.5; antagonism at ΣFIC50 >2.0; nondetrimental interactions when 0.5 < ƩFIC50 ≤2.0. The values show the mean of 3 independent assays for NF54.

In vitro drug combination assays for M5717+pyronaridine and atovaquone+proguanil in the NF54 strain, ATO, atovaquone; PRO, proguanil; PYRO, pyronaridine. ΣFIC50 (fractional inhibitory concentrations) indicate the following: synergism at ΣFIC50 ≤0.5; antagonism at ΣFIC50 >2.0; nondetrimental interactions when 0.5 < ƩFIC50 ≤2.0. The values show the mean of 3 independent assays for NF54.

In vivo combination.

We observed no detrimental pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between M5717 and pyronaridine with our in vivo combination experiments (Table 2; see Materials and Methods).
TABLE 2

Pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of M5717, pyronaridine, and M5717 + pyronaridine combination in vivo against P. falciparum Pf3D70087/N9 administered as a single oral dose

EntryM5717 exposure
Pyronaridine exposure
Parasitemiab
Dose (mg/kg)AUC0-infa (ng · h/ml)Dose (mg/kg)AUC0-infa (ng · h/ml)Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Mean DoRcn
A0Not measured0Not measured1.482.537.009.0034
B0Not measured0Not measured0.851.913.346.1634
131,570 ± 1390Not measured1.20.650.490.1962
263,390 ± 4790Not measured1.261.41.030.46172
3126,160 ± 4540Not measured0.810.580.530.11244
43016,900 ± 1990Not measured0.890.730.540.21242
50Not measured66,560 ± 3810.890.090.010.00d24 to 352
60Not measured1214,500 ± 1,0601.510.130.00d0.00d352
70Not measured3655,600 ± 2,0801.610.120.00d0.00d≥60e2
831,360 ± 9468,500 ± 6611.250.610.030.00d352
9126,400 ± 25768,490 ± 2,2600.830.340.030.04453
10126,650 ± 6451212,100 ± 1,8200.830.210.010.00d443
1162,980±1183658,200 ± 1931.290.240.030.00d≥60e2

The AUCs are mean values ± SD with n ≥ 2.

Mean % parasitemia as assessed by microscopy.

DoR, day of recrudescence, uncorrected (days postinfection; treatment was made on day 3).

Reached the lower limit of quantification (LLQ <0.01% parasitemia).

Experiment ended at day 60 with parasitemia <0.01%.

Pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of M5717, pyronaridine, and M5717 + pyronaridine combination in vivo against P. falciparum Pf3D70087/N9 administered as a single oral dose The AUCs are mean values ± SD with n ≥ 2. Mean % parasitemia as assessed by microscopy. DoR, day of recrudescence, uncorrected (days postinfection; treatment was made on day 3). Reached the lower limit of quantification (LLQ <0.01% parasitemia). Experiment ended at day 60 with parasitemia <0.01%. When administered alone, M5717 displayed a half-life (t1/2) of ∼37 h (Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). M5717 showed a dose proportionality in exposure (AUC0-inf) at 3, 6, 12, and 30 mg/kg, with a parasite clearance time in line with previously described experiments, i.e., we observed a biphasic clearance of parasitemia with a breakpoint at around 48 h between both phases. The first phase was characterized by a low parasite reduction ratio (PRR) and a long half-life of circulating parasites, while the second phase showed a rapid decline in parasitemia with higher PRR and a shorter half-life (entries 1 to 4) (7). Parasite recrudescence could be extended until day 24 with a plateau between 12 and 30 mg/kg. Sequencing of parasites recrudescing from the 30 mg/kg dose group indicated mutation of amino acids 182 and 138 in the eEF2 site (Table S4). Pyronaridine dosed at 6, 12, and 36 mg/kg showed a good dose linearity and led to a rapid decline in parasitemia in 2 days (entries 5 to 7). With a dose of 36 mg/kg, there was no parasite recrudescence as of day 60, when the experiment was concluded. The t1/2 of pyronaridine was estimated at 74 h (Fig. S1). In combination with pyronaridine, the pharmacokinetics of M5717 (Cmax, AUC0-inf, and t1/2) were unchanged compared to M5717 administered alone (entries 8 to 11). No change was observed in pyronaridine pharmacokinetics in the combination versus the single-agent treatments. Also, there was no relevant effect of M5717 on the rate of kill of pyronaridine at higher doses such as 12 and 36 mg/kg (entries 10 and 11). To further explore this combination and to bring more relevance, we decided to dose three groups of five mice. All groups were treated with the same suboptimal dose of M5717, i.e., 12 mg/kg single oral dose. We then added pyronaridine in two groups with 6 mg/kg and 12 mg/kg single oral doses, respectively. As previously described, a single oral dose of 12 mg/kg of M5717 displayed a delayed parasite clearance (Fig. 2A), where the lowest limit of quantification (LLQ) was reached after day 7 (i.e., day 8) postinfection (7). When combining M5717 with 6 mg/kg of pyronaridine, a similar parasite clearance time was observed, suggesting that the latter dose was suboptimal. However, on increasing the dose of pyronaridine to 12 mg/kg, the parasite clearance time was substantially increased and reached the LLQ at day 6 (Fig. 2A).
FIG 2

Pharmacodynamics upon single oral treatment of M5717 and pyronaridine (Pyro) as single agents or in combination against P. falciparum Pf3D70087/N9. (A) Parasite reduction rates from day 3 to day 7 compared to control (mean values, n = 5). (B) Five mice (M1 ■, M2 ▲, M3 ⧫, M4 •, M5 ×) were treated with a 12 mg/kg single oral dose of M5717 at day 3 postinfection (red arrow). (C) Five mice (M1’ ■, M2’ ▲, M3’ ⧫, M4’ •, M5’ ×) were treated with a single oral dose of 12 mg/kg M5717 and 6 mg/kg pyronaridine at day 3 postinfection (red arrow). (D) Five mice (M1” ■, M2” ▲, M3” ⧫, M4” •, M5” ×) were treated with a 12 mg/kg single oral dose of M5717 and pyronaridine at day 3 postinfection (red arrow). Parasitemia was measured by microscopy. Gray areas correspond to retreatments with the same initial dosing regimen at day 3 postinfection.

Pharmacodynamics upon single oral treatment of M5717 and pyronaridine (Pyro) as single agents or in combination against P. falciparum Pf3D70087/N9. (A) Parasite reduction rates from day 3 to day 7 compared to control (mean values, n = 5). (B) Five mice (M1 ■, M2 ▲, M3 ⧫, M4 •, M5 ×) were treated with a 12 mg/kg single oral dose of M5717 at day 3 postinfection (red arrow). (C) Five mice (M1’ ■, M2’ ▲, M3’ ⧫, M4’ •, M5’ ×) were treated with a single oral dose of 12 mg/kg M5717 and 6 mg/kg pyronaridine at day 3 postinfection (red arrow). (D) Five mice (M1” ■, M2” ▲, M3” ⧫, M4” •, M5” ×) were treated with a 12 mg/kg single oral dose of M5717 and pyronaridine at day 3 postinfection (red arrow). Parasitemia was measured by microscopy. Gray areas correspond to retreatments with the same initial dosing regimen at day 3 postinfection. With a single 12 mg/kg oral dose of M5717, all mice displayed parasite recrudescence above the LLQ (≥0.01%) around the third week postinfection (Fig. 2B). Mice with early recrudescence (D17, D18, and D19) were not susceptible to retreatment with the same dosing regimen, as opposed to mice with later-recrudescing parasites (D23 and D24), which responded partially to retreatment. With the same dose of M5717 (12 mg/kg), in combination with a suboptimal dose of pyronaridine at 6 mg/kg, the recrudescence pattern was partially affected (Fig. 2C). Mice had parasites reemerging between days 21 and 33 with a full response (i.e., similar rate of kill as in the initial treatment), from which two recrudesced again 28 to 36 days after retreatment, suggesting that the overall dose was suboptimal. When the dose of pyronaridine was increased to a more optimal dose of 12 mg/kg, the recrudescence pattern was altered again, with three mice showing no recrudescence at all by day 80 (Fig. 2D). The two mice with late recrudescence at around 7 weeks postinfection responded fully to the same retreatment.

In vivo selection of mutants.

We observed that monotherapy with M5717 in the murine P. falciparum SCID model can lead to selection of mutant parasites, and the addition of a suboptimal dose of pyronaridine during a combination treatment can clear M5717-related resistance (Fig. 3; see Materials and Methods).
FIG 3

Time to recrudescence (≥0.01% parasitemia) and parasite mutation profiles as a function of single oral treatments with 12 mg/kg single oral doses of M5717 (•), 12 mg/kg M5717 and 6 mg/kg pyronaridine (▲), and 12 mg/kg single oral dose of M5717 and pyronaridine (■) at day 3 postinfection. Parasitemia was measured by microscopy. Red icons correspond to M5717-mutant parasites with a high grade of resistance. Orange icons correspond to M5717-mutant parasites with a medium grade of resistance. Green icons correspond to wild-type parasites. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; NS, not significant.

Time to recrudescence (≥0.01% parasitemia) and parasite mutation profiles as a function of single oral treatments with 12 mg/kg single oral doses of M5717 (•), 12 mg/kg M5717 and 6 mg/kg pyronaridine (▲), and 12 mg/kg single oral dose of M5717 and pyronaridine (■) at day 3 postinfection. Parasitemia was measured by microscopy. Red icons correspond to M5717-mutant parasites with a high grade of resistance. Orange icons correspond to M5717-mutant parasites with a medium grade of resistance. Green icons correspond to wild-type parasites. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; NS, not significant. In the 12 mg/kg M5717 treatment arm, parasites reemerged in all mice. The median time to recrudescence of parasites in mice (M1, M2, M3, n = 3) showing no response to retreatment was 18 days. Sequencing indicated the mutation Y186N (Table S3) in the P. falciparum eEF2 site that has conferred high-grade resistance (>3,000-fold shift of half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50]) in prior in vitro studies (7). Mice exhibiting later recrudescence (M4 and M5, n = 2) showed a median recrudescence at 23.5 days and partially responded to retreatment. Sequencing of these mice showed the mutation T753N in the P. falciparum eEF2 site. Nearby mutations P754A, P754S, and L755F had IC50 fold shifts of 135-, 200-, and 660-fold, respectively, in prior in vitro studies, with the position 754 mutations corresponding to medium-grade resistance (7). Although the difference between early and late recrudescence groups was not significant (P = 0.06), the comparison was based on very small sample sizes (n = 3 and n = 2), so the P value of borderline significance should not be interpreted as no difference in recrudescence time. Overall, resistance evolved in 5/5 mice in the 12 mg/kg M5717 arm, with a median time to recrudescence of 19 days (Table S5). When adding a suboptimal dose of pyronaridine of 6 mg/kg to the 12 mg/kg of M5717 (n = 5), the median time to recrudescence was significantly shifted to 26 days (P = 0.0127). All parasites were sequenced and were found to be wild type, confirming that (i) combination with pyronaridine effectively suppressed the emergence of M5717-resistant parasites and (ii) the combined doses were subtherapeutic. Finally, when increasing the dose of pyronaridine to 12 mg/kg with 12 mg/kg of M5717 (n = 5), 3 mice were deemed cured, i.e., no recrudescence at day 80, while 2 mice (M1” and M2”) showed a median recrudescence on day 50 with wild-type parasites, as determined by sequencing. This increase in dose of pyronaridine significantly shifted the outcome compared to a suboptimal dose of pyronaridine (P = 0.0018).

DISCUSSION

The pressing need for new antimalarial combinations is mandated by the current decline in efficacy in artemisinin-based combination therapies in Southeast Asia, which has historically served as the bellwether for resistance emerging or spreading globally. Here, we report PK/PD studies on combinations of two potent antimalarials, M5717 and pyronaridine. Our study employed in vitro cultures of asexual blood-stage P. falciparum parasites and in vivo trials using the P. falciparum SCID mouse model. Overall the parasitological behavior was additive, and no pharmacokinetic interactions were observed when the two substances were given in combination. We hypothesized that M5717, the slower-acting partner that inhibits the parasite eukaryotic elongation factor PfeEF2, and pyronaridine, the faster-acting partner that inhibits the formation of hemozoin, could be an interesting pairing of antimalarials given their potential matching pharmacokinetic profiles (e.g., similar t1/2) and complementary pharmacodynamic characteristics. Pyronaridine was recently approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) (Article 58) in combination with artesunate under the brand name Pyramax by Shin-Poong Pharmaceutical, and several reports have studied the in vitro combination of pyronaridine and artesunate (19, 23, 24). This prompted a first in vitro assessment entailing isobologram analyses after various durations of exposure. Results were consistent with a mostly additive effect (Table 1). Given their additive effect and long t1/2 profiles in mice, namely, 37 h for M5717 and 74 h for pyronaridine, we proceeded with single oral dosing in the P. falciparum SCID mice model. For both compounds we measured pharmacokinetic (AUC0-inf) and pharmacodynamic (% parasitemia, day of recrudescence, sequencing) parameters. No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed between the two substances in the peripheral blood (Table 2). Overall, the two compounds showed additive parasitological properties, i.e., the rate of kill of pyronaridine seemed unaffected at therapeutic doses, and a delay in recrudescence was observed in combined treatment compared to monotherapy. Alone, pyronaridine was able to linearly extend the recrudescence time with doses of 6, 12, or 36 mg/kg. Conversely, a plateau to recrudescence was reached from 12 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg with M5717. DNA sequencing showed that M5717-resistant parasites had been selected, i.e., mutation occurred in the eEF2 locus that conferred a high degree of resistance. As it has been shown for atovaquone in the P. berghei mouse model, in-host selection of mutant parasites is possible and can be dose dependent, i.e., high doses yield highly resistant mutant selection whereas low doses can show selection of low-grade resistance (25, 26). To further investigate the effects of the combination on parasite recrudescence and M5717-resistant mutant selection, we chose a suboptimal dose of M5717 fixed at 12 mg/kg in all of the three treatment arms (n = 5 for each) followed by an increasing dose of the partner agent, pyronaridine at 6 or 12 mg/kg (Fig. 2). Monotherapy with M5717 at 12 mg/kg led to median recrudescence at day 20 with two subpopulations of mutants. By sequencing the monotherapy arm parasites, we showed that mutation in the eEF2 locus could be translated into no or partial response to retreatment with M5717 (Fig. 2B). Next, by gradually increasing the dose of the partner drug pyronaridine to a therapeutically relevant level, the parasite recrudescence pattern was favorably altered. We found that the addition of a suboptimal dose of pyronaridine totally suppressed the emergence of mutant parasites and also postponed the time to recrudescence significantly compared to M5717 alone (P < 0.05). In addition, increasing the dose of pyronaridine to 12 mg/kg along with a 12 mg/kg dose of M5717 gave a cure rate of 60% at day 80 and significantly postponed the day of recrudescence for the other mice (P < 0.001). These findings indicate that M5717 should not be exposed to parasites as a monotherapy and provide evidence that the constant presence of a partner drug in a matching pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic fashion is recommended, assuming that the observations made in mice are translatable to humans. The results described are the first report suggesting that M5717, a Plasmodium eEF2 inhibitor, and pyronaridine, a hemozoin formation inhibitor, could be an effective, long-lasting antimalarial combination with complementary pharmacodynamic profiles. The combination maintains fast clearance of blood-stage parasites while adding exoerythrocytic activity, consequently providing additional benefits for treatment, such as prophylaxis or transmission-blocking potential. Our isobologram data, combined with drug combination experiments in the P. falciparum SCID mouse model coupled with pharmacokinetic sampling and parasite sequencing, highlights the promise of this potential new antimalarial combination. Overall, molecules with a high propensity for generating resistance should be combined with a partner drug having, at a minimum, a matching anti-parasitic exposure with no or low propensity to generating resistance at relevant parasite inocula. If, in addition, these molecules have activity on exoerythrocytic stages (liver and gametes), then targeting populations with low parasitemia for prevention and prophylaxis rather than cure could leverage their full potential in view of supporting the malaria-elimination agenda.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In vitro isobolograms.

IC50 and drug interaction studies were performed as previously described (27, 28). Drug solutions were diluted with hypoxanthine-free culture medium to initial concentrations of 10 times the predetermined IC50 (named S10× IC50). The S10× IC50 solutions for each compound were combined in ratios of 1 + 3, 1 + 1, or 3 + 1, and each drug was also tested alone (Table 1). Aliquots of 100 μl of single and combination drug solutions were then introduced into 96-well plates to give duplicate rows and drugs were diluted 2-fold across a range of 10 concentrations. Equal volumes of parasite culture with a parasitemia of 0.3% in a 2.5% erythrocyte suspension were added and the test plates were incubated for 24 h, 48 h, or 72 h. Parasite growth was measured by the incorporation of radiolabeled [3H]hypoxanthine (0.25 μCi in a volume of 50 μl hypoxanthine-free culture medium) added 8 h (for 24 h assay duration) or 24 h (48 h and 72 h assay duration) prior to the termination of the test. Cultures were harvested onto glass fiber filters, washed, and the radioactivity was counted using a MicroBetaplate liquid scintillation counter and recorded as counts per minute (cpm) per well. Results are expressed as a percentage of the untreated controls (see the supplemental material for more details). Isobolograms were constructed by plotting the fractional inhibitory concentrations producing half-maximal growth (FIC50s) of drug A against the FIC50s of drug B for each of the three drug ratios. A concave curve indicated synergy, a straight line indicated additivity, and a convex curve indicated antagonism (see supplemental material). To obtain numeric values for the interaction, results were expressed as the sum of the FIC50A and FIC50B. Sum FIC50 values characterize the interactions as follows: synergism when the ΣFIC50 is ≤0.5; antagonism when the ΣFIC50 is >2.0; no interaction when 0.5 < ƩFIC50 ≤2.0 (29).

In vivo SCID mouse model.

Compound efficacy was assessed in the murine P. falciparum SCID model essentially as described by Jimenez-Díaz et al. (20). Briefly, alone or in combination, M5717 (succinate salt by Merck KGaA [MSC2576186-B4]) and pyronaridine (tetraphosphate salt, Sigma-Aldrich [P0049]) were formulated in 7% Tween80, 3% ethanol and administered to a cohort of age-matched female immunodeficient NOD-scid IL-2Rγ mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). These mice had been previously engrafted with human erythrocytes (generously provided by the blood bank in Zürich, Switzerland). Prior to compound treatment, mice were intravenously infected with 2 × 107 P. falciparum Pf3D70087/N9 -infected erythrocytes (day 0) (30). On day 3 after infection, mice, in groups of 2 to 5, were randomly allocated to treatments that were administered with a single oral gavage at 10 ml/kg (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Parasitemia was measured by microscopy. Chimerism was monitored by flow cytometry using an anti-murine erythrocyte TER119 monoclonal antibody (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) and SYTO-16 and then analyzed by flow cytometry in serial blood samples (2 μl) collected every 2 to 3 days until the completion of the experiment (Table 2, day 60 and Fig. 2, day 80). Parasite recrudescence was detected by microscopy. Once parasitemia exceeded 0.5%, then 100 to 500 μl of blood was collected and stored at –80°C for subsequent sequence analysis. Animals received a second treatment with the same dose and if applicable the same combination of compounds as previously administered in that dose group (Fig. 2). Efficacy was again monitored by microscopy. If recrudescence occurred again then new blood samples were stored at –80°C. In vivo studies conducted at the Swiss TPH, Basel, were approved by the veterinary authorities of the Canton Basel-Stadt (permit no. 2303) based on Swiss cantonal (Verordnung Veterinäramt Basel-Stadt) and national regulations (the Swiss animal protection law, Tierschutzgesetz).

Pharmacokinetic analysis.

The test compounds’ concentrations in blood were assessed in order to determine pharmacokinetic parameters in mice from the efficacy study. Peripheral blood samples (20 μl) were sampled at different time points (1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168, and 216 h post treatment), mixed with 20 μl of H2O Milli Q and immediately frozen on dry ice. Samples were stored at –80°C until analysis. Blood from control mice was used for bioanalysis calibration and QC purposes. For liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis, the frozen samples were thawed and treated with two volumes equivalent of acetonitrile containing the internal standard. After centrifugation, one volume equivalent of supernatant was diluted with one volume equivalent of water containing heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA). The extracts were analyzed by LC-MS/MS (quantification by HESI ionization in positive ion mode) performed at Swiss BioQuant AG (Switzerland). A noncompartmental analysis was performed to determine pharmacokinetic parameters using the Phoenix WinNonlin program (version 6.3).

Sequencing P. falciparum blood samples for eEF2 mutations.

Blood samples collected from mice with recrudescent infections were lysed in 0.1% saponin and washed twice with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), with repeat rounds as necessary. DNA was then extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen). The 2.7 kb PfeEF2 gene was PCR-amplified using flanking primers (Table S2). The PCR conditions for the initial amplification were: 95°C for 3 min, 45 rounds of 98°C for 20 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 2.5 min, with a final extension of 3 min at 68°C. Agarose gel (1%) electrophoresis was used to confirm the PCR product size. Sanger sequencing was carried out by Genewiz Inc. In addition to the amplification primers, nine additional sequencing primers were used to fully sequence the PfeEF2 gene (Table S2). All the sequences were aligned to the wild-type eEF2 3D7 sequence and analyzed on DNASTAR SeqMan Pro 15 software. Electropherograms were visually inspected to identify mixed sequences indicating multiple subpopulations.

Statistical analysis.

Time-to-recrudescence data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was performed for two-group comparisons. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test P values, as well as median estimates for time to recrudescence, are presented (SAS, Version 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2014).
  28 in total

1.  Modified fixed-ratio isobologram method for studying in vitro interactions between atovaquone and proguanil or dihydroartemisinin against drug-resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Quinton L Fivelman; Ipemida S Adagu; David C Warhurst
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  [Pharmacokinetics of pyronaridine in malaria patients].

Authors:  Z Feng; Z F Wu; C Y Wang; N X Jiang
Journal:  Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao       Date:  1987-11

3.  [Synthesis of 7351, a new antimalarial drug (author's transl)].

Authors:  X Y Zheng; Y Xia; F H Gao; C Chen
Journal:  Yao Xue Xue Bao       Date:  1979-12

4.  Interactions of atovaquone with other antimalarial drugs against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro.

Authors:  C J Canfield; M Pudney; W E Gutteridge
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.011

5.  In vitro activities of pyronaridine, alone and in combination with other antimalarial drugs, against Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  P Ringwald; E C Eboumbou; J Bickii; L K Basco
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Anti-malarial efficacy of pyronaridine and artesunate in combination in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Livia Vivas; Lauren Rattray; Lindsay Stewart; Emily Bongard; Brian L Robinson; Wallace Peters; Simon L Croft
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 3.112

7.  Review of pyronaridine anti-malarial properties and product characteristics.

Authors:  Simon L Croft; Stephan Duparc; Sarah J Arbe-Barnes; J Carl Craft; Chang-Sik Shin; Lawrence Fleckenstein; Isabelle Borghini-Fuhrer; Han-Jong Rim
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  P. falciparum in vitro killing rates allow to discriminate between different antimalarial mode-of-action.

Authors:  Laura M Sanz; Benigno Crespo; Cristina De-Cózar; Xavier C Ding; Jose L Llergo; Jeremy N Burrows; Jose F García-Bustos; Francisco-Javier Gamo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The genomic architecture of antimalarial drug resistance.

Authors:  Annie N Cowell; Elizabeth A Winzeler
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  A novel multiple-stage antimalarial agent that inhibits protein synthesis.

Authors:  Beatriz Baragaña; Irene Hallyburton; Marcus C S Lee; Neil R Norcross; Raffaella Grimaldi; Thomas D Otto; William R Proto; Andrew M Blagborough; Stephan Meister; Grennady Wirjanata; Andrea Ruecker; Leanna M Upton; Tara S Abraham; Mariana J Almeida; Anupam Pradhan; Achim Porzelle; María Santos Martínez; Torsten Luksch; Judith M Bolscher; Andrew Woodland; Suzanne Norval; Fabio Zuccotto; John Thomas; Frederick Simeons; Laste Stojanovski; Maria Osuna-Cabello; Paddy M Brock; Tom S Churcher; Katarzyna A Sala; Sara E Zakutansky; María Belén Jiménez-Díaz; Laura Maria Sanz; Jennifer Riley; Rajshekhar Basak; Michael Campbell; Vicky M Avery; Robert W Sauerwein; Koen J Dechering; Rintis Noviyanti; Brice Campo; Julie A Frearson; Iñigo Angulo-Barturen; Santiago Ferrer-Bazaga; Francisco Javier Gamo; Paul G Wyatt; Didier Leroy; Peter Siegl; Michael J Delves; Dennis E Kyle; Sergio Wittlin; Jutta Marfurt; Ric N Price; Robert E Sinden; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Susan A Charman; Lidiya Bebrevska; David W Gray; Simon Campbell; Alan H Fairlamb; Paul A Willis; Julian C Rayner; David A Fidock; Kevin D Read; Ian H Gilbert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Environmentally Responsible and Cost-Effective Synthesis of the Antimalarial Drug Pyronaridine.

Authors:  Joseph R A Kincaid; Rahul D Kavthe; Juan C Caravez; Balaram S Takale; Ruchita R Thakore; Bruce H Lipshutz
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 2.  Recent Progress in the Development of New Antimalarial Drugs with Novel Targets.

Authors:  Tafere Mulaw Belete
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.162

3.  Parasite-Host Dynamics throughout Antimalarial Drug Development Stages Complicate the Translation of Parasite Clearance.

Authors:  Lydia Burgert; Sophie Zaloumis; Saber Dini; Louise Marquart; Pengxing Cao; Mohammed Cherkaoui; Nathalie Gobeau; James McCarthy; Julie A Simpson; Jörg J Möhrle; Melissa A Penny
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antimalarial activity of the novel plasmodium eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 inhibitor M5717: a first-in-human, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single ascending dose study and volunteer infection study.

Authors:  James S McCarthy; Özkan Yalkinoglu; Anand Odedra; Rebecca Webster; Claude Oeuvray; Aliona Tappert; Deon Bezuidenhout; Marla J Giddins; Satish K Dhingra; David A Fidock; Louise Marquart; Lachlan Webb; Xiaoyan Yin; Akash Khandelwal; Wilhelmina M Bagchus
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Pre-erythrocytic Activity of M5717 in Monotherapy and Combination in Preclinical Plasmodium Infection Models.

Authors:  Diana Fontinha; Francisca Arez; Isabella Ramella Gal; Gonçalo Nogueira; Diana Moita; Tobias Hyun Ho Baeurle; Catarina Brito; Thomas Spangenberg; Paula M Alves; Miguel Prudêncio
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.084

6.  Molecular docking, simulation and binding free energy analysis of small molecules as PfHT1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Afolabi J Owoloye; Funmilayo C Ligali; Ojochenemi A Enejoh; Adesola Z Musa; Oluwagbemiga Aina; Emmanuel T Idowu; Kolapo M Oyebola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 7.  Review of the Current Landscape of the Potential of Nanotechnology for Future Malaria Diagnosis, Treatment, and Vaccination Strategies.

Authors:  Arnau Guasch-Girbau; Xavier Fernàndez-Busquets
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 8.  Malaria PK/PD and the Role Pharmacometrics Can Play in the Global Health Arena: Malaria Treatment Regimens for Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  Emma Hughes; Erika Wallender; Ali Mohamed Ali; Prasanna Jagannathan; Radojka M Savic
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 6.875

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.