| Literature DB >> 32041311 |
Paco Noriega1, José Ballesteros2, Alejandra De la Cruz1, Tatiana Veloz1.
Abstract
This study evaluates the antimicrobial and antifungal potential of the essential oil extracted from a species located in the Andes of Ecuador, Piper barbatum Kunth, known as "cordoncillo" or "allupa", used by the Quichua people as an antibacterial plant for washing female genitalia in cases of infection. The most abundant molecules in the essential oil were: α- phellandrene (43.16%), limonene (7.04%); some oxygenated sesquiterpenes such as: trans-sesquisabinene hydrate (8.23%), elemol (7.21%) and others. The evaluation of antimicrobial activity showed activity in all the strains analyzed; however, those in which MIC values are considered to be very strong (less than 500 µg/mL) are: Staphylococcus aureus 264 µg/mL, Streptococcus mutans 132 µg/mL, Candida albicans 132 µg/mL and Candida tropicalis 264 µg/mL. Antimicrobial bioautography defines which molecules are responsible for the activity; thus, it was possible to establish the chromatographic regions of = 0.02 and Rf = 0.04, as those with active molecules. It was established that 4 hydroxylated sesquiterpene molecules are involved: elemol (7.21%), trans-sesquisabinene hydrate (8.23%), β-eudesmol (3.49%) and 10-epi-γ-eudesmol (1.07%); the last two being the most active. The aim of this manuscript is to analyze both the ancestral knowledge of the Quichua people of Ecuador, and the chemical-biodiversity of the Andean forest ecosystem, in order to provide new raw materials of pharmaceutical interest.Entities:
Keywords: 10-epi-γ-eudesmol; Piper barbatum Kunth; antimicrobial compounds; essential oil; β–eudesmol
Year: 2020 PMID: 32041311 PMCID: PMC7076699 DOI: 10.3390/plants9020211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Chemical composition of the essential oil of Piper barbatum.
| Compound | Relative área (%) | RI lit a | RI exp b |
|---|---|---|---|
| α- thujene | 0.65 ± 0.00 | 924 | 926 |
| α- pinene | 5.63 ± 0.05 | 932 | 931 |
| camphene | 0.33 ± 0.00 | 946 | 947 |
| sabinene | 2.49 ± 0.23 | 969 | 969 |
| β – pinene | 0.18 ± 0.00 | 974 | 976 |
| myrcene | 1.09 ± 0.00 | 988 | 991 |
| α- phellandrene | 43.16 ± 0.29 | 1002 | 1007 |
| delta-3-carene | 4.60 ± 0.04 | 1008 | 1012 |
| limonene | 7.04 ± 0.06 | 1024 | 1027 |
| β-phellandrene | 3.82 ± 0.17 | 1025 | 1029 |
| p-mentha-2,4-diene | 1.29 ± 0.04 | 1085 | 1087 |
| bicyclogermacrene | 0.73 ± 0.00 | 1500 | 1492 |
| epi-cis-4-dihydrogafuran | 0.64 ± 0.00 | 1499 | 1497 |
| β –dihydro agarofuran | 2.74 ± 0.00 | 1503 | 1508 |
| β –curcumene | 0.69 ± 0.00 | 1514 | 1513 |
| cubebol | 0.15 ± 0.00 | 1514 | 1515 |
| p-sesquisabinene hydrate | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 1542 | 1445 |
| β –elemol | 7.21 ± 0.21 | 1548 | 1550 |
| trans-sesquisabinene hydrate | 8.23 ± 0.21 | 1542 | 1550 |
| (E)-nerolidol | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 1561 | 1565 |
| germacrene D-4- ol | 0.16 ± 0.00 | 1574 | 1578 |
| no identificado | 1.04 ± 0.00 | - | - |
| 10-epi-γ-eudesmol | 1.07 ± 0.03 | 1622 | 1627 |
| epi-1-cubenol | 0.20 ± 0.00 | 1627 | 1630 |
| eremoligenol | 0.21 ± 0.00 | 1629 | 1632 |
| β -eudesmol | 3.49 ± 0.11 | 1649 | 1654 |
| β-epi-bisabolol | 0.26 ± 0.00 | 1670 | 1677 |
| α-(-) bisabolol | 1.73 ± 0.02 | 1685 | 1688 |
Note: a Literature retention index by Adams [17], b Experimental retention index comparing a series of C8-C30 alkanes. The percentages of each area had a standard derivation < 5.0 %.
Values of the minimum inhibitory concentration of P. barbatum essential oil in the different microorganisms.
| Microorganism | Citral MIC Values in | Positive Controla | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 528 | 245 | 464 | 50 |
|
| 528 | 122 | 464 | 50 |
|
| 2110 | 122 | 464 | 25 |
|
| 2110 | 245 | 9283 | 25 |
|
| ||||
|
| 264 | 245 | 232 | 25 |
|
| 528 | 122 | 464 | 50 |
|
| 2110 | 122 | 464 | 50 |
|
| 528 | 500 | 232 | 25 |
|
| 528 | 245 | 464 | 50 |
|
| 132 | 61 | 232 | 25 |
|
| ||||
|
| 132 | 61 | 116 | 40 |
|
| 264 | 122 | 116 | 40 |
Note: a erythromycin for Gram-positive bacteria; gentamicin for Gram-negative bacteria and clotrimazole for yeasts.
Figure 1Antimicrobial bioautography against Staphylococcus aureus, Gram-positive bacteria.
Figure 2Antimicrobial bioautography against Escherichia coli, Gram-negative bacteria.