| Literature DB >> 30713575 |
José L Ballesteros1,2, Massimo Tacchini1, Antonella Spagnoletti1, Alessandro Grandini1, Guglielmo Paganetto1, Luca Maria Neri3, Arianna Marengo4, Letizia Angiolella5, Alessandra Guerrini1, Gianni Sacchetti1.
Abstract
Piper carpunya Ruiz & Pav. (Piperaceae) is a perennial aromatic shrub of Amazonian area of Ecuador and Peru, belonging to the ethnomedicine of these countries. The traditional preparations of the crude drug (fresh leaves used topically as is, and dried leaves in infusions or decoctions) are known for anti-inflammatory, antiulcer, antidiarrheal, antiparasitic effects, and wound healing properties. In light of this traditional evidence, chemical composition (GC-MS) and biological activity, i.e., antioxidant, antifungal (yeast) capacities, and genotoxicity, of Amazonian P. carpunya leaf essential oil (EO) have been investigated in order to valorize some of the putative ethnomedical effects. The EO was obtained through steam distillation of fresh leaves (yield: 7.6 g/kg [0.76%]; refractive index at 20°C: 1.49; density: 0.928 g/mL). Chemical characterization performed through GC-MS evidenced the presence of 21 compounds (96.2% of the total). The most abundant constituents were piperitone (26.2%), limonene (9.5%), elemicin (7.2%), and β-phellandrene (5.6%). In vitro DPPH antioxidant assay showed a weak radical scavenging ability (IC50) if compared to positive control. Low bioactivity of the EO was also demonstrated against yeast, but it showed an interesting synergistic activity (FIC index of EO+fluconazole) against Candida sp. strains. Ames test evidenced the safety of the EO concerning genotoxicity.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30713575 PMCID: PMC6333012 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6194640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Chemical characterization of P. carpunya EO performed by GC-MS and GC-FID analyses.
|
|
|
|
|
| % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| RI, MS | 920 | 924 | 0.2 |
| 2 |
| Std | 927 | 932 | 3.4 |
| 3 | sabinene | Std | 965 | 969 | 1.4 |
| 4 |
| Std | 970 | 974 | 1.1 |
| 5 | myrcene | RI, MS | 985 | 988 | 1.4 |
| 6 |
| RI, MS | 995 | 1001 | 0.2 |
| 7 |
| RI, MS | 1003 | 1002 | 1.1 |
| 8 |
| RI, MS | 1004 | 1008 | 0.3 |
| 9 |
| RI, MS | 1012 | 1014 | 3.9 |
| 10 | p-cymene | RI, MS | 1019 | 1020 | 3.4 |
| 11 | limonene | Std | 1023 | 1024 | 9.5 |
| 12 |
| RI, MS | 1024 | 1025 | 5.6 |
| 13 | 1,8-cineole | Std | 1026 | 1026 | 4.0 |
| 14 |
| RI, MS | 1041 | 1044 | 0.2 |
| 15 |
| RI, MS | 1051 | 1054 | 3.0 |
| 16 |
| RI, MS | 1065 | 1060 | 0.2 |
| 17 | linalool | Std | 1099 | 1095 | 1.5 |
| 18 | 1,3,8-p-menthatriene | RI, MS | 1109 | 1110 | 0.3 |
| 19 | 3-thujen-2-ol | RI, MS | 1168 | 1167 | 2.4 |
| 20 | terpinen-4-ol | Std | 1174 | 1174 | 0.3 |
| 21 | neoisodihydrocarveol | RI, MS | 1233 | 1229 | 0.6 |
| 22 | cuminaldehyde | RI, MS | 1237 | 1238 | 0.3 |
| 23 | piperitone | Std | 1250 | 1249 | 26.2 |
| 24 |
| RI, MS | 1279 | 1283 | 1.3 |
| 25 | safrole | RI, MS | 1283 | 1285 | 2.2 |
| 26 | thymol | Std | 1293 | 1289 | 0.9 |
| 27 | carvacrol | RI, MS | 1300 | 1298 | 0.7 |
| 28 |
| RI, MS | 1354 | 1343 | 1.3 |
| 29 | eugenol | Std | 1361 | 1356 | 0.9 |
| 30 |
| RI, MS | 1374 | 1374 | 0.4 |
| 31 |
| RI, MS | 1387 | 1389 | 0.2 |
| 32 |
| RI, MS | 1397 | 1401 | 0.2 |
| 33 | methyleugenol | RI, MS | 1401 | 1403 | 4.5 |
| 34 |
| Std | 1408 | 1417 | 0.3 |
| 35 | p-cymen-7-ol acetate | RI, MS | 1422 | 1421 | 1.5 |
| 36 | germacrene D | RI, MS | 1474 | 1485 | 1.4 |
| 37 | bicyclogermacrene | RI, MS | 1488 | 1500 | 1.2 |
| 38 | elemicin | RI, MS | 1551 | 1555 | 7.2 |
| 39 |
| Std | 1561 | 1561 | 0.2 |
| 40 | spathulenol | RI, MS | 1574 | 1577 | 0.7 |
| 41 | globulol | RI, MS | 1583 | 1585 | 0.5 |
| 42 | viridiflorol | RI, MS | 1592 | 1592 | 0.1 |
|
| |||||
| Total | 96.2 | ||||
| Hydrocarbon monoterpenes | 35.0 | ||||
| Oxygenated monoterpenes | 41.2 | ||||
| Hydrocarbon sesquiterpenes | 3.7 | ||||
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 1.5 | ||||
| Phenylpropanoids | 14.8 | ||||
a Compounds are listed in order of elution from a Varian VF-5ms column.
b Identification method adopted for each compound.
c Retention indices calculated on a Varian VF-5ms column.
d Relative area percentage (peak area relative to total peak area %).
Figure 1Experimental mass-spectra of (a) limonene, (b) β-phellandrene, (c) 1,8-cineole, (d) piperitone, (e) methyeugenol and (f) elemicin.
Antioxidant properties of P. carpunya EO evaluated by DPPH assay. The values, expressed as IC50, were compared to thymol, piperitone, limonene, 1,8-cineole, methyleugenol and Trolox®.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| 159.80 ± 3.40 | 71.88 ± 1.53 |
| piperitone | 2278.00 ± 31.74 | 2.61 ± 0.32 |
| limonene | >1000 | <0.89 |
| 1,8-cineole | >1000 | <2.05 |
| methyleugenol | 602.00±5.59 | 17.87±0.56 |
| thymol | 70.80 ± 1.51 | 160.02 ± 3.45 |
| trolox | 3.97 ± 0.40 | -- |
1 IC50: concentration corresponding to the 50% of the bioactivity;
2 TEAC: Trolox equivalent (TE) antioxidant capacity.
Synergistic effect of P. carpunya EO employing fluconazole as synthetic active drug against Candida sp.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (EO+FLU) (EO+FLU) | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | ||
|
| 0.281 | 0.281 | 1562 | 1562 | 128 | 128 |
|
| 0.375 | 0.375 | 1562 | 1562 | 32 | 32 |
|
|
|
| 781 | 1562 | 32 | 32 |
FICindex: fractional inhibitory concentration index; FICindex≤ 0.5 means the presence of synergistic effect; 0.5≤FICindex ≤2 means additive or indifferent effect; FICindex> 2 means antagonistic effect[9, 10].
∗ Values displaying a synergistic effect.
∗∗ Concentration in μg/mL of EO and FLU, respectively, corresponding to FICindex.
MIC: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (μg/mL); MFC: Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (μg/mL).
EO: P. carpunya EO; FLU: fluconazole.
Figure 2Time-killing curves of MICs (Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations, μg/mL) of P. carpunya (EO), fluconazole (FLU) and their combination (FIC index) against C. albicans (AIDS6).
Ames test performed to check the genotoxic safety (no. of revertants induced) of P. carpunya EO. The results are expressed as average of number of colonies per plate, followed by the standard deviation (sd). t/c means the ratio between the number of colonies of Salmonella strains grown in presence of EO and those of the negative control (DMSO). If t/c ratio is ≥ 2, following a dose-response trend, the extract can be considered as potential mutagen [11].
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| 10 | 149.0 ± 7.6 | 1.15 | 24 ± 4.2 | 0.79 | 89 ± 9.9 | 0.81 | 4.0 ± 2.8 | 0.57 |
| 50 | 110.5 ± 10.1 | 0.85 | 20 ± 5.7 | 0.66 | 87 ± 1.4 | 0.79 | 10.5 ± 0.7 | 1.50 |
| 100 | 149.5 ± 8.5 | 1.15 | 25 ± 8.4 | 0.82 | 77 ± 12.7 | 0.70 | 3.0 ± 1.4 | 0.43 |
| 500 | 65.0 ± 9.7 | 0.50 | 29.5 ± 2.1 | 0.97 | 46.0 ± 2.8 | 0.42 | 36 ± 3.2 | 5.14 |
| 1000 | 546.0 ± 31.1 | 4.20 | 26.0 ± 2.8 | 0.85 | 8.5 ± 3.5 | 0.08 | 8.0 ± 11.3 | 1.14 |
| 5000 | 12.5 ± 0.7 | 0.10 | 25.5 ± 19.1 | 0.84 | 19 ± 24.0 | 0.17 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.00 |
| 10000 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.00 | 10.5 ± 6.4 | 0.34 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.00 |
| DMSO (100 | 130.0 ± 14.2 | 1.00 | 30.5 ± 0.7 | 1.00 | 110 ± 7.1 | 1.00 | 7.0 ± 2.8 | 1.00 |
| 2-Nitrofluorene (2 | 1554 ± 113.3 | 12.00 | 716 ± 75.0 | 23.48 | -- | -- | 47 ± 1.8 | 6.71 |
| Sodium azide (1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 688 ± 72.0 | 6.25 | -- | -- |
|
| ||||||||
| 10 | 67.5 ± 8.4 | 0.39 | 44 ± 2.8 | 1..06 | 106 ± 14.1 | 1.15 | 9.5 ± 0.7 | 1.00 |
| 50 | 112.5 ± 9.7 | 0.66 | 34 ± 4.2 | 0.82 | 84 ± 5.7 | 0.91 | 12 ± 1.4 | 1.26 |
| 100 | 112.5 ± 8.1 | 0.66 | 43 ± 14.1 | 1.04 | 87 ± 26.9 | 0.95 | 11 ± 4.2 | 1.16 |
| 500 | 157.5 ± 12.1 | 0.92 | 35 ± 0.0 | 0.84 | 76.5 ± 9.2 | 0.83 | 38.5 ± 6.8 | 4.05 |
| 1000 | 175.5 ± 10.2 | 1.03 | 37.5 ± 6.4 | 0.90 | 64.5 ± 9.2 | 0.70 | 23.5 ± 33.2 | 2.47 |
| 5000 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.00 | 25 ± 7.1 | 0.60 | 22.5 ± 12.0 | 0.24 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.00 |
| 10000 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.00 | 14 ± 4.2 | 0.34 | 6 ± 5.7 | 0.07 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.00 |
| DMSO, 100 | 171.0 ± 6.8 | 1.00 | 41.5 ± 2.1 | 1.00 | 92 ± 2.8 | 1.00 | 9.5 ± 0.7 | 1.00 |
| 2-Aminoanthracene (2 | 896 ± 10.4 | 5.24 | 932 ± 98.0 | 22.46 | 912 ± 95.0 | 9.91 | 168 ± 18.0 | 17.68 |
+S9: experiments performed with metabolic activation (S9 mix).
-S9: experiments performed without metabolic activation (S9 mix).
DMSO: dimethylsulfoxide, negative control; 2-aminoanthracene: positive control for experiments with S9; 2-nitrofluorene: positive control for TA97a and TA98 strains for experiments without S9; Sodium azide: positive control for TA100 and TA1535 strains for experiments without S9.
∗Values corresponding to mutagen activity.