Svetla Slavova1,2, Dana Quesinberry1,3, Julia F Costich1,3, Emilia Pasalic4, Pedro Martinez4, Julia Martin5, Sarah Eustice1, Peter Akpunonu5, Terry L Bunn1,6. 1. Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 3. Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 4. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 6. Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Valid opioid poisoning morbidity definitions are essential to the accuracy of national surveillance. The goal of our study was to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of case definitions identifying emergency department (ED) visits for heroin or other opioid poisonings, using billing records with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. METHODS: We examined billing records for ED visits from 4 health care networks (12 EDs) from October 2015 through December 2016. We conducted medical record reviews of representative samples to estimate the PPVs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of (1) first-listed heroin poisoning diagnoses (n = 398), (2) secondary heroin poisoning diagnoses (n = 102), (3) first-listed other opioid poisoning diagnoses (n = 452), and (4) secondary other opioid poisoning diagnoses (n = 103). RESULTS: First-listed heroin poisoning diagnoses had an estimated PPV of 93.2% (95% CI, 90.0%-96.3%), higher than secondary heroin poisoning diagnoses (76.5%; 95% CI, 68.1%-84.8%). Among other opioid poisoning diagnoses, the estimated PPV was 79.4% (95% CI, 75.7%-83.1%) for first-listed diagnoses and 67.0% (95% CI, 57.8%-76.2%) for secondary diagnoses. Naloxone was administered in 867 of 1055 (82.2%) cases; 254 patients received multiple doses. One-third of all patients had a previous drug poisoning. Drug testing was ordered in only 354 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that heroin or other opioid poisoning surveillance definitions that include multiple diagnoses (first-listed and secondary) would identify a high percentage of true-positive cases.
OBJECTIVES: Valid opioid poisoning morbidity definitions are essential to the accuracy of national surveillance. The goal of our study was to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of case definitions identifying emergency department (ED) visits for heroin or other opioid poisonings, using billing records with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. METHODS: We examined billing records for ED visits from 4 health care networks (12 EDs) from October 2015 through December 2016. We conducted medical record reviews of representative samples to estimate the PPVs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of (1) first-listed heroin poisoning diagnoses (n = 398), (2) secondary heroin poisoning diagnoses (n = 102), (3) first-listed other opioid poisoning diagnoses (n = 452), and (4) secondary other opioid poisoning diagnoses (n = 103). RESULTS: First-listed heroin poisoning diagnoses had an estimated PPV of 93.2% (95% CI, 90.0%-96.3%), higher than secondary heroin poisoning diagnoses (76.5%; 95% CI, 68.1%-84.8%). Among other opioid poisoning diagnoses, the estimated PPV was 79.4% (95% CI, 75.7%-83.1%) for first-listed diagnoses and 67.0% (95% CI, 57.8%-76.2%) for secondary diagnoses. Naloxone was administered in 867 of 1055 (82.2%) cases; 254 patients received multiple doses. One-third of all patients had a previous drug poisoning. Drug testing was ordered in only 354 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that heroin or other opioid poisoning surveillance definitions that include multiple diagnoses (first-listed and secondary) would identify a high percentage of true-positive cases.
Entities:
Keywords:
case definition; heroin poisoning; opioid poisoning; positive predictive value
Authors: Andrew Worster; R Daniel Bledsoe; Paul Cleve; Christopher M Fernandes; Suneel Upadhye; Kevin Eva Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Cecilia P Chung; S Todd Callahan; William O Cooper; Katherine T Murray; Kathi Hall; Judith A Dudley; C Michael Stein; Wayne A Ray Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2015-07-04
Authors: Stephen Crystal; Molly Nowels; Hillary Samples; Mark Olfson; Arthur Robin Williams; Peter Treitler Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Joshua J Fenton; Elizabeth Magnan; Irakis Erik Tseregounis; Guibo Xing; Alicia L Agnoli; Daniel J Tancredi Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Danielle M Brathwaite; Catherine S Wolff; Amy I Ising; Scott K Proescholdbell; Anna E Waller Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2021 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.792