Alicia Agnoli1,2, Guibo Xing2, Daniel J Tancredi2,3, Elizabeth Magnan1,2, Anthony Jerant1,2, Joshua J Fenton1,2,4. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 2. Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 4. OptumLabs Visiting Fellow, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
Abstract
Importance: Opioid-related mortality and national prescribing guidelines have led to tapering of doses among patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain. There is limited information about risks related to tapering, including overdose and mental health crisis. Objective: To assess whether there are associations between opioid dose tapering and rates of overdose and mental health crisis among patients prescribed stable, long-term, higher-dose opioids. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study using deidentified medical and pharmacy claims and enrollment data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse from 2008 to 2019. Adults in the US prescribed stable higher doses (mean ≥50 morphine milligram equivalents/d) of opioids for a 12-month baseline period with at least 2 months of follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Exposures: Opioid tapering, defined as at least 15% relative reduction in mean daily dose during any of 6 overlapping 60-day windows within a 7-month follow-up period. Maximum monthly dose reduction velocity was computed during the same period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Emergency or hospital encounters for (1) drug overdose or withdrawal and (2) mental health crisis (depression, anxiety, suicide attempt) during up to 12 months of follow-up. Discrete time negative binomial regression models estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) of outcomes as a function of tapering (vs no tapering) and dose reduction velocity. Results: The final cohort included 113 618 patients after 203 920 stable baseline periods. Among the patients who underwent dose tapering, 54.3% were women (vs 53.2% among those who did not undergo dose tapering), the mean age was 57.7 years (vs 58.3 years), and 38.8% were commercially insured (vs 41.9%). Posttapering patient periods were associated with an adjusted incidence rate of 9.3 overdose events per 100 person-years compared with 5.5 events per 100 person-years in nontapered periods (adjusted incidence rate difference, 3.8 per 100 person-years [95% CI, 3.0-4.6]; aIRR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.53-1.85]). Tapering was associated with an adjusted incidence rate of 7.6 mental health crisis events per 100 person-years compared with 3.3 events per 100 person-years among nontapered periods (adjusted incidence rate difference, 4.3 per 100 person-years [95% CI, 3.2-5.3]; aIRR, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.96-2.65]). Increasing maximum monthly dose reduction velocity by 10% was associated with an aIRR of 1.09 for overdose (95% CI, 1.07-1.11) and of 1.18 for mental health crisis (95% CI, 1.14-1.21). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients prescribed stable, long-term, higher-dose opioid therapy, tapering events were significantly associated with increased risk of overdose and mental health crisis. Although these findings raise questions about potential harms of tapering, interpretation is limited by the observational study design.
Importance: Opioid-related mortality and national prescribing guidelines have led to tapering of doses among patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain. There is limited information about risks related to tapering, including overdose and mental health crisis. Objective: To assess whether there are associations between opioid dose tapering and rates of overdose and mental health crisis among patients prescribed stable, long-term, higher-dose opioids. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study using deidentified medical and pharmacy claims and enrollment data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse from 2008 to 2019. Adults in the US prescribed stable higher doses (mean ≥50 morphine milligram equivalents/d) of opioids for a 12-month baseline period with at least 2 months of follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Exposures: Opioid tapering, defined as at least 15% relative reduction in mean daily dose during any of 6 overlapping 60-day windows within a 7-month follow-up period. Maximum monthly dose reduction velocity was computed during the same period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Emergency or hospital encounters for (1) drug overdose or withdrawal and (2) mental health crisis (depression, anxiety, suicide attempt) during up to 12 months of follow-up. Discrete time negative binomial regression models estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) of outcomes as a function of tapering (vs no tapering) and dose reduction velocity. Results: The final cohort included 113 618 patients after 203 920 stable baseline periods. Among the patients who underwent dose tapering, 54.3% were women (vs 53.2% among those who did not undergo dose tapering), the mean age was 57.7 years (vs 58.3 years), and 38.8% were commercially insured (vs 41.9%). Posttapering patient periods were associated with an adjusted incidence rate of 9.3 overdose events per 100 person-years compared with 5.5 events per 100 person-years in nontapered periods (adjusted incidence rate difference, 3.8 per 100 person-years [95% CI, 3.0-4.6]; aIRR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.53-1.85]). Tapering was associated with an adjusted incidence rate of 7.6 mental health crisis events per 100 person-years compared with 3.3 events per 100 person-years among nontapered periods (adjusted incidence rate difference, 4.3 per 100 person-years [95% CI, 3.2-5.3]; aIRR, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.96-2.65]). Increasing maximum monthly dose reduction velocity by 10% was associated with an aIRR of 1.09 for overdose (95% CI, 1.07-1.11) and of 1.18 for mental health crisis (95% CI, 1.14-1.21). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients prescribed stable, long-term, higher-dose opioid therapy, tapering events were significantly associated with increased risk of overdose and mental health crisis. Although these findings raise questions about potential harms of tapering, interpretation is limited by the observational study design.
Authors: Carla A Green; Nancy A Perrin; Shannon L Janoff; Cynthia I Campbell; Howard D Chilcoat; Paul M Coplan Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Michael I Demidenko; Steven K Dobscha; Benjamin J Morasco; Thomas H A Meath; Mark A Ilgen; Travis I Lovejoy Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Roger Chou; Judith A Turner; Emily B Devine; Ryan N Hansen; Sean D Sullivan; Ian Blazina; Tracy Dana; Christina Bougatsos; Richard A Deyo Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Joshua J Fenton; Elizabeth M Magnan; Alicia L Agnoli; Stephen G Henry; Guibo Xing; Daniel J Tancredi Journal: Pain Med Date: 2021-07-25 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Stephen G Henry; Debora A Paterniti; Bo Feng; Ana-Maria Iosif; Richard L Kravitz; Gary Weinberg; Penney Cowan; Susan Verba Journal: J Pain Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Molly Moore Jeffery; W Michael Hooten; Henry J Henk; M Fernanda Bellolio; Erik P Hess; Ellen Meara; Joseph S Ross; Nilay D Shah Journal: BMJ Date: 2018-08-01
Authors: Bradley D Stein; Flora Sheng; Erin A Taylor; Andrew W Dick; Mark Sorbero; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Tarlise N Townsend; Talya Salz; Rebecca L Haffajee; Megan E V Caram; Fumiko Chino; Amy S B Bohnert Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2021-10-15 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Ingrid A Binswanger; Susan M Shetterly; Stanley Xu; Komal J Narwaney; David L McClure; Deborah J Rinehart; Anh P Nguyen; Jason M Glanz Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-10-03
Authors: Stephen G Henry; Joshua J Fenton; Cynthia I Campbell; Mark Sullivan; Gary Weinberg; Hiba Naz; Wyatt M Graham; Michelle L Dossett; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 3.423
Authors: Chongliang Luo; Kun Chen; Riddhi Doshi; Nathaniel Rickles; Yong Chen; Harold Schwartz; Robert H Aseltine Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 3.752