Literature DB >> 3203993

Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography.

L L Berland1, J Y Lee.   

Abstract

Contrast injection techniques now in use for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography (DICT) were designed for scanners using slower scan acquisition rates than the currently available 6 to 12 scans/minute. Of 53 patients examined, (1) 19 received a conventional 2-minute injection of 150 or 120 mL of 60% contrast material selected by patient weight; (2) 19 received the same doses within 1 minute; and (3) 15 received 20% lower doses within 1 minute. The faster injection groups 2 and 3 reached peak enhancement sooner (57 and 60 seconds vs. 97 seconds) with similar or higher peak hepatic enhancement (73 and 64 HU vs. 58 HU) and equivalent hepatic enhancement (52 and 48 HU vs. 54 HU) after 150 seconds. Because detecting neoplastic liver lesions often depends on enhancement, 1-minute injections of high doses of contrast material with rapid scan rates may be superior to 2-minute injections. When cost or dose-related toxicity are important, 1-minute injections of 20% lower contrast doses may be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3203993     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198812000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  8 in total

Review 1.  MDCT of benign liver tumors and metastases.

Authors:  Pierre-Jean Valette; Frank Pilleul; Arielle Crombé-Ternamian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Enhancement of the liver on dynamic MDCT: investigation among three groups consisting of noncirrhotic patients and cirrhotic patients with and without a large portosystemic shunt.

Authors:  Kouichirou Naruo; Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Yasushi Fukuda; Kunihiko Fukuda
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-04-27

3.  Contrast enhancement in multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) of the abdomen: intraindividual comparison of contrast media containing 300 mg versus 370 mg iodine per ml.

Authors:  F F Behrendt; A H Mahnken; S Keil; M Das; C Hohl; D Bauer; P Seidensticker; E Jost; J E Wildberger; R W Günther; G Mühlenbruch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Pediatric hepatic CT: an injection protocol.

Authors:  K J Roche; N B Genieser; M M Ambrosino
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996

5.  Effect of contrast injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight and fixed injection duration on aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector-row helical CT.

Authors:  Kazuo Awai; Shinichi Hori
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Body size indices to determine iodine mass with contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography of the upper abdomen: does body surface area outperform total body weight or lean body weight?

Authors:  Hiroshi Kondo; Masayuki Kanematsu; Satoshi Goshima; Haruo Watanabe; Hiroshi Kawada; Noriyuki Moriyama; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Liver metastases: imaging considerations for protocol development with multislice CT (MSCT).

Authors:  Paul M Silverman
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals.

Authors:  Masahiro Okada; Hiroshi Kondo; Hironobu Sou; Takamichi Murakami; Masayuki Kanematsu; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Shushi Yoshikawa; Kazuhito Shiosakai; Akiko Hayakawa; Kazuo Awai; Kengo Yoshimitsu; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-07-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.